Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday October 16 2018, @11:54AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-two-dimensional dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

The vast majority of computing devices today are made from silicon, the second most abundant element on Earth, after oxygen. Silicon can be found in various forms in rocks, clay, sand, and soil. And while it is not the best semiconducting material that exists on the planet, it is by far the most readily available. As such, silicon is the dominant material used in most electronic devices, including sensors, solar cells, and the integrated circuits within our computers and smartphones.

Now MIT engineers have developed a technique to fabricate ultrathin semiconducting films made from a host of exotic materials other than silicon. To demonstrate their technique, the researchers fabricated flexible films made from gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, and lithium fluoride—materials that exhibit better performance than silicon but until now have been prohibitively expensive to produce in functional devices.

The new technique, researchers say, provides a cost-effective method to fabricate flexible electronics made from any combination of semiconducting elements, that could perform better than current silicon-based devices.

"We've opened up a way to make flexible electronics with so many different material systems, other than silicon," says Jeehwan Kim, the Class of 1947 Career Development Associate Professor in the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering. Kim envisions the technique can be used to manufacture low-cost, high-performance devices such as flexible solar cells, and wearable computers and sensors.

and see https://phys.org/news/2018-10-cost-effective-method-semiconducting-materials-outperform.html#nRlv for a more readable summary

Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0176-4


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday October 16 2018, @12:04PM

    by VLM (445) on Tuesday October 16 2018, @12:04PM (#749484)

    There are other inherent problems. Off the top of my head for GaAs... Can't do CMOS designs because they can't make P-type transistors or maybe it was N-type something to do with ridiculous ratio of electron/hole mobility. Can't make an oxide layer (for MOS transistors) by spraying oxygen and letting natural oxide layer form (gotta CVD something else).

    GaAs makes really cool ultra high speed bipolar transistors but you can't just copy the masks from a current CPU to a GaAs process and expect them to work; they won't. Back to bipolar ECL or TTL complete redesign maybe. Of course a ECL design modern CPU would take something like a nuclear reactor to power it (and cool it)

    Gallium is rarer but cheaper than gold, so there's that issue. That "cheaper than gold" thing will turn around if you make solar cells out of it.

    GaAs makes nice microwave ICs; but there are non-economic reasons we won't see CPUs soon.

  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Tuesday October 16 2018, @12:35PM (1 child)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Tuesday October 16 2018, @12:35PM (#749494) Homepage Journal

    I'm working my way through Wikipedia's list of gubernatorial races. When I get those done I'll take a break by visiting some of Rupert Murdoch's properties, also a few Websites Of Ill Repute:

    # Google Analytics

    127.0.0.1 ssl.google-analytics.com
    127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com

    # Double Click

    127.0.0.1 bid.g.doubleclick.net
    127.0.0.1 stats.g.doubleclick.net

    127.0.0.1 googleads.g.doubleclick.net

    # Wix

    127.0.0.1 frog.wix.com

    # WordPress

    127.0.0.1 pixel.wp.com

    # NetSolAds - Network Solutions?

    127.0.0.1 stats.netsolads.com

    # TypeKit

    127.0.0.1 p.typekit.net

    # Twitter

    127.0.0.1 analytics.twitter.com

    # Simpli Fi?

    127.0.0.1 i.simpli.fi

    # New Relic - I think this may not be for tracking, rather performance monitoring

    127.0.0.1 bam.nr-data.net

    # Adobe Analytics

    127.0.0.1 pinpointdigital.demdex.net

    # AddRoll
    # https://www.adroll.com/ [adroll.com]

    127.0.0.1 d.adroll.com

    # Quantcast
    # https://www.quantcast.com/ [quantcast.com]

    127.0.0.1 pixel.quantserve.com

    # Amobee
    # https://www.amobee.com/ [amobee.com]

    127.0.0.1 r.turn.com

    # MailChimp

    127.0.0.1 chimpstatic.com

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:55PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:55PM (#749952)

      new to this dns-lookup-intercept technique and have been using some list by "some one who cares" for a while now.
      the "127.0.0.1" or "0.0.0.0" doesn't sound "right" for me: why would i direct all those bad domains to myself?
      my solution was to pick one "real" IP (in my case the toss of a coin decided it would be 8.8.4.4) and then blackholed it at the default-gateway-router.
      also, it seems that "drop"-ing packets sometimes gives cramps to certain web-programs ("why won't you answer me?WAAAHHH! let's try again!" and again and again) so "reject"-ing them gives better performance.
      -
      as for the topic: the "peel" is a mirror image ... "police" or "ambulance" is hard to read if you're not looking out the rear-mirror sometimes.
      not sure, but if you get two (2) "expensive" originals but mirror copies of each other, then make cheap film copies(R-L) and layer them "correctly" the "logic" might be build vertical instead of horizontally? if square, you could also turn them 90, 180, 270 deg during layering? R-0 / L-90 / L-270 / R-180 / etc ...?

(1)