Move over, Hubble: Discovery of expanding cosmos assigned to little-known Belgian astronomer-priest
Hubble's Law, a cornerstone of cosmology that describes the expanding universe, should now be called the Hubble-Lemaître Law, following a vote by the members of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the same organization that revoked Pluto's status as a planet. The change is designed to redress the historical neglect of Georges Lemaître, a Belgian astronomer and priest who in 1927 discovered the expanding universe—which also suggests a big bang. Lemaître published his ideas 2 years before U.S. astronomer Edwin Hubble described his observations that galaxies farther from the Milky Way recede faster.
The final tally of the 4060 cast votes, announced today by IAU, was 78% in favor of the name change, 20% against, and 2% abstaining. But the vote was not without controversy, both in its execution and the historical facts it was based on. Helge Kragh, a historian of science at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, calls the background notes presented to IAU members "bad history." Others argue it is not IAU's job to rename physical laws. "It's bad practice to retroactively change history," says Matthias Steinmetz of the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics in Potsdam, Germany. "It never works."
[...] In 1927 Lemaître calculated a solution to Albert Einstein's general relativity equations that indicated the universe could not be static but was instead expanding. He backed up that claim with a limited set of previously published measurements of the distances of galaxies and their velocities, calculated from their Doppler shifts. However, he published his results in French, in an obscure Belgian journal, and so they went largely unnoticed.
In 1929, Hubble published his own observations showing a linear relationship between velocity and distance for receding galaxies. It became known as Hubble's Law. "Hubble was clearly involved, but was not the first," says astronomer Michael Merrifield of the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. "He was good at selling his story."
[...] A final concern is whether IAU is within its rights to weigh in on historical affairs. "There is no mandate to name physical laws," Steinmetz says. IAU has acknowledged this and is only recommending the use of the term Hubble-Lemaître Law. Will it catch on? "No, I don't think so," Kragh says. "Hubble Law is ingrained in the literature for most of a century."
In any event, says Merrifield, "It doesn't matter all that much, really."
Related: UCF Researcher Argues That Pluto is a Planet, 2006 IAU Definition is Invalid
Related Stories
Pluto a Planet? New Research from UCF Suggests Yes
The reason Pluto lost its planet status is not valid, according to new research from the University of Central Florida in Orlando. In 2006, the International Astronomical Union, a global group of astronomy experts, established a definition of a planet that required it to "clear" its orbit, or in other words, be the largest gravitational force in its orbit. [...] [Philip] Metzger, who is lead author on the study, reviewed scientific literature from the past 200 years and found only one publication -- from 1802 -- that used the clearing-orbit requirement to classify planets, and it was based on since-disproven reasoning.
[...] The planetary scientist said that the literature review showed that the real division between planets and other celestial bodies, such as asteroids, occurred in the early 1950s when Gerard Kuiper published a paper that made the distinction based on how they were formed. However, even this reason is no longer considered a factor that determines if a celestial body is a planet, Metzger said.
[...] Instead, Metzger recommends classifying a planet based on if it is large enough that its gravity allows it to become spherical in shape. "And that's not just an arbitrary definition, Metzger said. "It turns out this is an important milestone in the evolution of a planetary body, because apparently when it happens, it initiates active geology in the body." Pluto, for instance, has an underground ocean, a multilayer atmosphere, organic compounds, evidence of ancient lakes and multiple moons, he said. "It's more dynamic and alive than Mars," Metzger said. "The only planet that has more complex geology is the Earth."
Planet Ceres, please.
The Reclassification of Asteroids from Planets to Non-Planets (DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.026) (DX)
Related: Pluto May Regain Status as Planet
Earth is a "Dwarf Planet" Because it has not Cleared its Orbit
(Score: 4, Funny) by Hartree on Thursday November 01 2018, @02:55AM (2 children)
I've heard that Richard Stallman says this law should be called the Gnu-Hubble-Lemaitre law.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @03:44AM
But does it run Linux? And can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of those?!
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @04:09AM
But then again, calling it GNU/Linux actually makes plenty of sense, especially today. GNU/Linux means something rather specific, the Linux kernel with the GNU userland, because there are other uses of the Linux kernel these days that don't use the GNU userland at all, such as Android/Linux.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @03:48AM (7 children)
Ah, that's what happened. He should have published in the lingua franca of science!
(Score: 2) by jelizondo on Thursday November 01 2018, @04:49AM (4 children)
Except that back then the lingua franca was German
Read some history boy/girl, learn that English became the lingua franca of science after WWII and not before.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @05:56AM
Das ist only becaust you could maken zee uberlongenizedconjugatensciencyesoundedwordens. Ja.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday November 01 2018, @02:49PM (1 child)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by jelizondo on Thursday November 01 2018, @03:50PM
Certainly, there was science published in French and English, and no, German was not as popular (dominant?) as English is today. However, as you point out, Germany was a powerhouse and if you wanted to be in the cutting edge of Physics or Mathematics, German was the language.
After WWII with a lot of scientists moving [i.e Einstein] (or being taken [i.e. Von Braun]) to the US, English became dominant to the point that publishing in a language other than English is futile.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @07:26PM
Maybe you should learn how to read boy/girl.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @07:49AM
This is an important failure. Who cares how some law is called. The important piece is major scientific work was apparently overlooked stunting the progress of knowledge.
How many articles are currently overlooked because they publish say in Chinese? More specifically I think this is a failure of how scientific results are currently distributed, i.e. the journals.
We must fix science. I hereby propose a system to translate papers. Of course this will be impossible because of copyright. Copyright held not by the authors but by the predatory journals.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @10:02PM
He probably couldn't afford the astronomical fees demanded by better known publishers
(Score: 4, Interesting) by stormwyrm on Thursday November 01 2018, @04:00AM
From what I know Georges Lemaître is today not that obscure, as he is honoured for the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric which is the key solution to the field equations of General Relativity that forms the basis for today's standard model of cosmology.
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
(Score: 2) by suburbanitemediocrity on Thursday November 01 2018, @06:50AM (1 child)
I think everyone for whom this matters already knows. Reminds me of the people at code reviews who have nothing to contribute, so they'll spend all their time on variable names.
(Score: 2) by Bobs on Thursday November 01 2018, @01:21PM
Good point.
But damn, it is a lot easier to maintain someone else's code when they use good, standardized variable naming conventions.
(Score: 2) by KritonK on Thursday November 01 2018, @07:58AM (1 child)
... shouldn't it be called Lemaître's or the Lemaître-Hubble Law?
This reminds me of the law [wikipedia.org] describing the relationship between the pressure and volume of a perfect gas, which I learned as the Boyle-Mariotte law, but I gather that is called Boyle's law in Anglo-Saxon countries.
(Score: 2) by Unixnut on Thursday November 01 2018, @10:47AM
Yep, as a resident of an "Anglo-saxon country", I have only ever heard of it as Boyle's law. This is the first time I hear "Boyle-Mariotte".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 02 2018, @03:47PM
Vatican Observatory Hosts Conference on Astronomy [soylentnews.org]