Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday November 11 2018, @04:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the energy-for-free dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Batteryless smart devices closer to reality

Researchers at the University of Waterloo have taken a huge step towards making smart devices that do not use batteries or require charging.

These battery-free objects, which feature an IP address for internet connectivity, are known as Internet of Things (IoT) devices. If an IoT device can operate without a battery it lowers maintenance costs and allows the device to be placed in areas that are off the grid.

Many of these IoT devices have sensors in them to detect their environment, from a room's ambient temperature and light levels to sound and motion, but one of the biggest challenges is making these devices sustainable and battery-free.

Professor Omid Abari, Postdoctoral Fellow Ju Wang and Professor Srinivasan Keshav from Waterloo's Cheriton School of Computer Science have found a way to hack radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, the ubiquitous squiggly ribbons of metal with a tiny chip found in various objects, and give the devices the ability to sense the environment.

"It's really easy to do," said Wang. "First, you remove the plastic cover from the RFID tag, then cut out a small section of the tag's antenna with scissors, then attach a sensor across the cut bits of the antenna to complete the circuit."

In their stock form, RFID tags provide only identification and location. It's the hack the research team has done -- cutting the tag's antenna and placing a sensing device across it -- that gives the tag the ability to sense its environment.

[...] The research paper by Wang, Abari and Keshav titled, Challenge: RFID Hacking for Fun and Profit-ACM MobiCom, appeared in the Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, October 29-November 2, 2018, New Delhi, India, 461- 70.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Sunday November 11 2018, @05:37AM (5 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Sunday November 11 2018, @05:37AM (#760579) Homepage Journal

    ... than to have my Things be on the Internet.

    Did you know that IPv6 enables us all to have The Mark Of The Beast?

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by mhajicek on Sunday November 11 2018, @06:01AM (1 child)

      by mhajicek (51) on Sunday November 11 2018, @06:01AM (#760586)

      And now it's impossible to turn the thing off.

      --
      The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
      • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Sunday November 11 2018, @07:38AM

        by acid andy (1683) on Sunday November 11 2018, @07:38AM (#760603) Homepage Journal

        May I suggest a large sledgehammer?

        --
        If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
    • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @09:35AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @09:35AM (#760610)

      How about intranet of things? If you want to use these devices for your house, do not allow them to connect to the internet. Just use them in an intranet. Obviusly do not buy IOT devices, which require services from manufacturers in that case. You can then make a combined set of information you want to see/control outside of the house in your own terms.

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @11:56AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @11:56AM (#760624)

        That would require actual smart devices, as opposed to the current wave of pretend-smart devices that are actually stupid slaves to some Centrally Intelligent Agent somewhere else.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 14 2018, @08:10PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 14 2018, @08:10PM (#761876)

          Exactly

  • (Score: 2) by bradley13 on Sunday November 11 2018, @02:19PM (3 children)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Sunday November 11 2018, @02:19PM (#760639) Homepage Journal

    All they did is put a switch between the RFID tag and its antenna. Whoopi.

    Not seeing where an IP address comes from. Also, RFID, which means that these chips are only powered if a reader is pointed at them - nothing new there either.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by RandomFactor on Sunday November 11 2018, @04:39PM

      by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Sunday November 11 2018, @04:39PM (#760657) Journal

      Yes, sounds like a way to grab a teensy bit of current from a handscanner's signal, which RFID tags already do by design, and then instead of using it to power the RFID tag use it to run
       
      If you really want off the grid, might I recommend...mushrooms?
       
      https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/11/10/1633249 [soylentnews.org]
       
      Although I guess we would have to rename IoT to Internet of Toadstools

      --
      В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
    • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Sunday November 11 2018, @06:59PM (1 child)

      by jmorris (4844) on Sunday November 11 2018, @06:59PM (#760683)

      More important, they are idiots who don't know how to google. You can buy RFID tags with built in sensors. The manual for the FEIG RFID scanners I use documents some of them.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @10:48PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 11 2018, @10:48PM (#760728)

        Give them a break, they're foreigners who had to study in Canada because the USA has more effective screening systems.

(1)