Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday January 15 2019, @12:59AM   Printer-friendly
from the more-and-faster-and-cheaper...how'd-they-do-that? dept.

At AMD's CES 2019 keynote, CEO Lisa Su revealed the Radeon VII, a $700 GPU built on TSMC's "7nm" process. The GPU should have around the same performance and price as Nvidia's already-released RTX 2080. While it does not have any dedicated ray-tracing capabilities, it includes 16 GB of High Bandwidth Memory.

Nvidia's CEO has trashed his competitor's new GPU, calling it "underwhelming" and "lousy". Meanwhile, Nvidia has announced that it will support Adaptive Sync, the standardized version of AMD's FreeSync dynamic refresh rate and anti-screen tearing technology. Lisa Su also says that AMD is working on supporting ray tracing in future GPUs, but that the ecosystem is not ready yet.

Su also showed off a third-generation Ryzen CPU at the CES keynote, but did not announce a release date or lineup details. Like the second generation of Epyc server CPUs, the new Ryzen CPUs will be primarily built on TSMC's "7nm" process, but will include a "14nm" GlobalFoundries I/O part that includes the memory controllers and PCIe lanes. The CPUs will support PCIe 4.0.

The Ryzen 3000-series ("Matisse") should provide a roughly 15% single-threaded performance increase while significantly lowering power consumption. However, it has been speculated that the chips could include up to 16 cores or 8 cores with a separate graphics chiplet. AMD has denied that there will be a variant with integrated graphics, but Lisa Su has left the door open for 12- or 16-core versions of Ryzen, saying that "There is some extra room on that package, and I think you might expect we'll have more than eight cores". Here's "that package".

Also at The Verge.

Previously: Watch AMD's CES 2019 Keynote Live: 9am PT/12pm ET/5pm UK


Original Submission

Related Stories

Nvidia Announces RTX 2080 Ti, 2080, and 2070 GPUs, Claims 25x Increase in Ray-Tracing Performance 23 comments

NVIDIA Announces the GeForce RTX 20 Series: RTX 2080 Ti & 2080 on Sept. 20th, RTX 2070 in October

NVIDIA's Gamescom 2018 keynote just wrapped up, and as many have been expecting since it was announced last month, NVIDIA is getting ready to launch their next generation of GeForce hardware. Announced at the event and going on sale starting September 20th is NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 20 series, which is succeeding the current Pascal-powered GeForce GTX 10 series. Based on NVIDIA's new Turing GPU architecture and built on TSMC's 12nm "FFN" process, NVIDIA has lofty goals, looking to drive an entire paradigm shift in how games are rendered and how PC video cards are evaluated. CEO Jensen Huang has called Turing NVIDIA's most important GPU architecture since 2006's Tesla GPU architecture (G80 GPU), and from a features standpoint it's clear that he's not overstating matters.

[...] So what does Turing bring to the table? The marquee feature across the board is hybrid rendering, which combines ray tracing with traditional rasterization to exploit the strengths of both technologies. This announcement is essentially a continuation of NVIDIA's RTX announcement from earlier this year, so if you thought that announcement was a little sparse, well then here is the rest of the story.

The big change here is that NVIDIA is going to be including even more ray tracing hardware with Turing in order to offer faster and more efficient hardware ray tracing acceleration. New to the Turing architecture is what NVIDIA is calling an RT core, the underpinnings of which we aren't fully informed on at this time, but serve as dedicated ray tracing processors. These processor blocks accelerate both ray-triangle intersection checks and bounding volume hierarchy (BVH) manipulation, the latter being a very popular data structure for storing objects for ray tracing.

NVIDIA is stating that the fastest GeForce RTX part can cast 10 Billion (Giga) rays per second, which compared to the unaccelerated Pascal is a 25x improvement in ray tracing performance.

Nvidia has confirmed that the machine learning capabilities (tensor cores) of the GPU will used to smooth out problems with ray-tracing. Real-time AI denoising (4m17s) will be used to reduce the amount of samples per pixel needed to achieve photorealism.

Previously: Microsoft Announces Directx 12 Raytracing API
Nvidia Announces Turing Architecture With Focus on Ray-Tracing and Lower-Precision Operations

Related: Real-time Ray-tracing at GDC 2014


Original Submission

AMD Previews Zen 2 Epyc CPUs with up to 64 Cores, New "Chiplet" Design 9 comments

AMD has announced the next generation of its Epyc server processors, with up to 64 cores (128 threads) each. Instead of an 8-core "core complex" (CCX), AMD's 64-core chips will feature 8 "chiplets" with 8 cores each:

AMD on Tuesday formally announced its next-generation EPYC processor code-named Rome. The new server CPU will feature up to 64 cores featuring the Zen 2 microarchitecture, thus providing at least two times higher performance per socket than existing EPYC chips.

As discussed in a separate story covering AMD's new 'chiplet' design approach, AMD EPYC 'Rome' processor will carry multiple CPU chiplets manufactured using TSMC's 7 nm fabrication process as well as an I/O die produced at a 14 nm node. As it appears, high-performance 'Rome' processors will use eight CPU chiplets offering 64 x86 cores in total.

Why chiplets?

Separating CPU chiplets from the I/O die has its advantages because it enables AMD to make the CPU chiplets smaller as physical interfaces (such as DRAM and Infinity Fabric) do not scale that well with shrinks of process technology. Therefore, instead of making CPU chiplets bigger and more expensive to manufacture, AMD decided to incorporate DRAM and some other I/O into a separate chip. Besides lower costs, the added benefit that AMD is going to enjoy with its 7 nm chiplets is ability to easier[sic] bin new chips for needed clocks and power, which is something that is hard to estimate in case of servers.

AMD also announced that Zen 4 is under development. It could be made on a "5nm" node, although that is speculation. The Zen 3 microarchitecture will be made on TSMC's N7+ process ("7nm" with more extensive use of extreme ultraviolet lithography).

AMD's Epyc CPUs will now be offered on Amazon Web Services.

AnandTech live blog of New Horizon event.

Previously: AMD Epyc 7000-Series Launched With Up to 32 Cores
TSMC Will Make AMD's "7nm" Epyc Server CPUs
Intel Announces 48-core Xeons Using Multiple Dies, Ahead of AMD Announcement

Related: Cray CS500 Supercomputers to Include AMD's Epyc as a Processor Option
Oracle Offers Servers with AMD's Epyc to its Cloud Customers


Original Submission

Watch AMD's CES 2019 Keynote Live: 9am PT/12pm ET/5pm UK 16 comments

https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/01/08/watch-amds-keynote-live-schedule-and-livestream-times-a-ces-2019

Dr. Lisa Su, the president and CEO of AMD, will be joined by various guests to discuss new computing tech and its applications—from solving world issues to shaping the future of video games, virtual reality, and more. Read on for a rundown of when and where to watch the keynote live.

AMD will hold its CES 2019 keynote on Wednesday, January 9 at 9am PT/12pm ET/5pm UK (Thursday, January 10 at 4am AET). The event will be streamed live from the Venetian in Las Vegas, and viewable here on IGN.

AMD YouTube stream. Also at AnandTech, Tom's Hardware, and Wccftech.


Original Submission

Intel Core i9-9990XE: Up to 5.0 GHz, Auction Only; AMD Radeon VII: Less Than 5,000 Available 18 comments

Intel Core i9-9990XE : Up to 5.0 GHz, Auction Only

AnandTech has seen documents and supporting information from multiple sources that show that Intel is planning to release a new high-end desktop processor, the Core i9-9990XE. These documents show that the processors will not be sold at retail; rather they will only be sold to system integrators, and then only through a closed online auction.

This new processor will be the highest numbered processor in Intel's high-end desktop line. The current top processor is the i9-9980XE, an 18 core part with a base frequency of 3.5 GHz and a turbo frequency of 4.0 GHz. The i9-9990XE, on the other hand, is not simply the 9980XE with an increase in frequency.

The Core i9-9990XE will be a 14 core processor, but with a base frequency of 4.0 GHz and a turbo frequency of 5.0 GHz. This makes it a super-binned 9940X.

AMD Radeon VII: less than 5000 available, no custom cards

The new Radeon VII otherwise known as Radeon 7 is a revamped Vega graphics card, where at the end of the day it's just a Radeon Instinct MI50 accelerator that was released in November last year. We have the same Vega 20 GPU on the fresh new 7nm node, the same 16GB of HBM2 memory, and similar GPU clocks to the new Radeon VII graphics card.

Since the announcement I reached out to some industry contacts who said there will be "less than 5000" made. The same source said AMD is losing money on each card sold as they are, as I said before, just Radeon Instinct MI50 cards that are being re-purposed into 'new' Radeon VII cards.

The improved cooler will keep it cooler than the Radeon Instinct MI50, while the same 300W TDP applies. Even the Radeon Instinct MI50 performance falls between the GeForce RTX 2070 and RTX 2080, while the new Radeon VII has performance that equals and will sometimes (higher resolutions like 4K and beyond) beat the RTX 2080.

Previously: AMD Announces Radeon VII GPU, Teases Third-Generation Ryzen CPU


Original Submission #1   Original Submission #2

AMD Responds to Radeon VII Short Supply Rumors 4 comments

AMD Responds to Radeon VII Short Supply Rumours

A few days ago we reported on rumours which alleged that AMD's Radeon VII graphics card would be in short supply, with a report claiming that AMD had "less than 5,000", units to sell.

The report also stated that AMD would also lose money on every graphics card sold, likely due to the device's workstation/datacenter origins and its use of 16GB of costly HBM2 memory.

This morning AMD has released an official response to these rumours, claiming that the company expects to meet demand from gamers, declining to release detailed production numbers. On top of that, AMD also confirmed that the company's AIB partners would be selling Radeon VII graphics cards, alongside their retail presence on AMD.com, which means that AMD has produced their new graphics card in large enough quantities for AIBs to receive a sizable stock allocation.

Will AMD's Lisa Su Step Up as Intel's Next CEO?

Intel's next CEO is a hot topic in the tech sector. Rumors suggest that the company plans to announce its new CEO before its fourth quarter of 2018 earnings release on January 24. Intel's only rival in the PC and server CPU market is Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). Speculation of an Intel–AMD merger keeps popping up, but it's unwarranted. The merger can never be a reality, as it would remove competition from the CPU market.

At CES 2019 (the Consumer Electronics Show), AMD overshadowed Intel with its 7nm (nanometer) product announcements. AMD's presentation once again sparked speculation of an Intel–AMD merger. An article in EE Times cited Jon Peddie Research vice president Kathleen Maher's views on this speculation.

She dismissed the speculation that Intel might acquire AMD, stating that AMD has nothing Intel wants except a CEO. Her comments were reiterated by Tirias Research principal analyst Kevin Krewell, who told EE Times that Intel "could try to hire Lisa Su, but that would be hard as well."

Previously: AMD Announces Radeon VII GPU, Teases Third-Generation Ryzen CPU
Intel Core i9-9990XE: Up to 5.0 GHz, Auction Only; AMD Radeon VII: Less Than 5,000 Available


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

AMD and Nvidia's Latest GPUs Are Expensive and Unappealing 25 comments

AMD, Nvidia Have Launched the Least-Appealing GPU Upgrades in History

Yesterday, AMD launched the Radeon VII, the first 7nm GPU. The card is intended to compete with Nvidia's RTX family of Turing-class GPUs, and it does, broadly matching the RTX 2080. It also matches the RTX 2080 on price, at $700. Because this card began life as a professional GPU intended for scientific computing and AI/ML workloads, it's unlikely that we'll see lower-end variants. That section of AMD's product stack will be filled by 7nm Navi, which arrives later this year.

Navi will be AMD's first new 7nm GPU architecture and will offer a chance to hit 'reset' on what has been, to date, the least compelling suite of GPU launches AMD and Nvidia have ever collectively kicked out the door. Nvidia has relentlessly moved its stack pricing higher while holding performance per dollar mostly constant. With the RTX 2060 and GTX 1070 Ti fairly evenly matched across a wide suite of games, the question of whether the RTX 2060 is better priced largely hinges on whether you stick to formal launch pricing for both cards or check historical data for actual price shifts.

Such comparisons are increasingly incidental, given that Pascal GPU prices are rising and cards are getting harder to find, but they aren't meaningless for people who either bought a Pascal GPU already or are willing to consider a used card. If you're an Nvidia fan already sitting on top of a high-end Pascal card, Turing doesn't offer you a great deal of performance improvement.

AMD has not covered itself in glory, either. The Radeon VII is, at least, unreservedly faster than the Vega 64. There's no equivalent last-generation GPU in AMD's stack to match it. But it also duplicates the Vega 64's overall power and noise profile, limiting the overall appeal, and it matches the RTX 2080's bad price. A 1.75x increase in price for a 1.32x increase in 4K performance isn't a great ratio even by the standards of ultra-high-end GPUs, where performance typically comes with a price penalty.

Rumors and leaks have suggested that Nvidia will release a Turing-based GPU called the GTX 1660 Ti (which has also been referred to as "1160"), with a lower price but missing the dedicated ray-tracing cores of the RTX 2000-series. AMD is expected to release "7nm" Navi GPUs sometime during 2019.

Radeon VII launch coverage also at AnandTech, Tom's Hardware.

Related: AMD Returns to the Datacenter, Set to Launch "7nm" Radeon Instinct GPUs for Machine Learning in 2018
Nvidia Announces RTX 2080 Ti, 2080, and 2070 GPUs, Claims 25x Increase in Ray-Tracing Performance
AMD Announces "7nm" Vega GPUs for the Enterprise Market
Nvidia Announces RTX 2060 GPU
AMD Announces Radeon VII GPU, Teases Third-Generation Ryzen CPU
AMD Responds to Radeon VII Short Supply Rumors


Original Submission

Remove Denuvo DRM, Gain Up to 20 FPS in Devil May Cry 5 16 comments

Denuvo-Free Devil May Cry 5 Reportedly Improves the Game's Performance by Up to 20FPS

It appears that Denuvo's anti-tamper tech has significant impact on Devil May Cry 5's performance, and a Denuvo-free .exe game file has now surfaced online.

The Devil May Cry 5 .exe file was actually released by Capcom following the game's release earlier today, but has now been pulled. However, the file can still be downloaded through the Steam console. Several users are reporting FPS improvements by up to 20FPS while using the Denuvo-free exe file.

Sound familiar? Devil May Cry 5 is the game AMD demoed running on a Radeon VII GPU at its CES 2019 keynote. I wonder if they were running it with DRM.

Average frame rates are only part of the story when it comes to a game's performance. Minimum frame rates, percentiles, etc. can measure frame stuttering. A significant boost in a game's performance can also increase minimum frame rates.

Related:


Original Submission

Intel's Comet Lake Could Boost Mainstream Core Count to 10 to Compete with AMD's Ryzen 3000-Series 15 comments

Refresh Done Right? Intel Comet Lake Packs Up to 10 Cores

[coreboot], an open source project to replace the BIOS and UEFI, has some vital information on Comet Lakes. According to the Github page, Comet Lake-U (CML-U) processors, which are primarily aimed at laptops, carry up to six cores, while the Comet Lake-H (CFL-H) and Comet Lake-S (CMT-S) chips feature up to 10 cores.

Rumors on the street are that AMD's forthcoming Ryzen 3000-series desktop processors could purportedly pack a whopping 16 cores on a single chip. During AMD's presentation at the CES 2019 tech show in January, an eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 3000-series chip was trading blows with Intel's Core i9-9900K, which could have pressured the Santa Clara chipmaker to cranking Comet Lake's core count to 10 cores for safe measure.

Intel is expected to launch its Comet Lake processors around the middle of the year. It's possible Intel could announce the chips at Computex 2019, which starts May 28.

Also at PCGamesN.

Related: AMD Announces Radeon VII GPU, Teases Third-Generation Ryzen CPU


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @01:07AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @01:07AM (#786731)

    This is not a gaming card, it is a compute card for (high-end) gaming prices. A major bottleneck of computing on GPU is moving data from system memory to GPU memory, the number of cores and clock speed really isn't a big deal in comparison. Is there a comparable card with 16GB of GPU memory?

    On amazon [amazon.com] the only comparable cards I see are in the thousands of dollars range.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @03:20AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @03:20AM (#786771)

      I already looked. The RTX2060 is the closest 'cheap' card that Nvidia has, at 350 for 6GIG ram and competitive performance to the Vega 56 (it is comparable to RX570/580 on Single precision, but close to Vega 56 on FP16/FP64).

      As far as GPU memory goes, AMD is hands up the winner compared to NVidia, with both HBM and larger capacities than Nvidia's GDDR6 devices. However between its lack of Cuda or even just hands off Cuda to OpenCL translation, it loses for a lot of applications, as well as where drive polish matters (their drives are STILL not coming out reliable a year later, just like when they started during GCN 1.0. Combined with their DRMed video bios and further locking down and reduced documentation, AMD is only compelling on cost and for a subset of workloads you can get away with them on. I don't imagine Intel is going to fare well against either of them when they finally release in a few years, but there is an opening in the market if Qualcomm or Broadcom chose to produce a discrete version of their own video hardware, both of which already have open source drivers and at least partial open source firmware thanks to reverse engineering. Since neither appears to required signed firmware blobs, both would provide a more libre alternative for open source systems, and once the money was there should have no trouble funding development for HBM based higher performance models. In the meantime, models with higher clocks and dedicated memory/bus access should be competitive with low end GPU hardware that has stagnated for at least the past 5 years, leaving openings until the other market members drop their cards down to reasonable price points once more.

  • (Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Tuesday January 15 2019, @04:04AM (1 child)

    by linkdude64 (5482) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 15 2019, @04:04AM (#786784)

    Then Ryzen CPUs, which typically become system bottlenecks at 1080p and below due to single threaded performance, will pair beautifully with cards like the VII, where all of that memory is available for larger textures. Red Team will be the Intel/Nvidia slayers for 4k gaming for at least the next year or two.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @05:35AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 15 2019, @05:35AM (#786796)

      AMD needs to release new thread repairs like once a year. Their cpus are so buggy that all the fanbois get excited for each new repair.

  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday January 15 2019, @05:53AM (9 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @05:53AM (#786807) Journal

    Maybe if I have enough money (aaaahahaha) by the time Ryzen 3xxx is out I'll get back into Gentoo/Funtoo with it. Whichever of the chips can reasonably fit into the Fractal Design Node 202 case with a Noctua L9H-AM4 cooler, a tiny Optane SSD, and as much RAM as possible, is my target. Imagine something that looks like an XBox's scary kid sister with the brains of a small data center from 5 years ago basically. It's wonderful to see AMD succeeding like this, in spite of all the dirty underhanded tricks Intel's played on it.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday January 15 2019, @08:44AM (1 child)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday January 15 2019, @08:44AM (#786838) Journal

      Are you moving from Ryzen 1700/1800 to 12-16 cores? I could imagine that setup lasting a long time. In fact, it could last until "the end".

      Ryzen will have at least one "7nm+" refresh and make it onto the "5nm" node. From there we start looking into the distance... either a Moore's law abyss of "1-3nm" [semiengineering.com] or a singularity of 3D ICs [darpa.mil] and stackable transistors [soylentnews.org].

      It should become clear where computing is heading by around 2025. If we get the magical developments I linked, we could see classical computing eventually get a thousand or a million times faster, making existing systems look like trash and enabling bizarre new software use cases for home users. If not, I doubt most people will need more than the 16-core Ryzen.

      FYI: Any of the Zen 2 chips should fit into existing sockets. Even a 16-core Ryzen. But certain features might require a new motherboard. Or not, if you're lucky. [tomshardware.com]

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:55PM

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:55PM (#786998) Journal

        I have a Thinkpad T440s, with a Core i5-4200U in it. This is just fantasy; I'll be lucky to just be able to afford utilities and rent in the future, even WITH a full-time pharmacy tech job, unless I can pick up extra shifts since it's only 0.7 FTE officially. And I'm trying to help a very sick, very poor friend, which is where any extra goes.

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2) by bobthecimmerian on Tuesday January 15 2019, @12:28PM (2 children)

      by bobthecimmerian (6834) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @12:28PM (#786870)

      My current Linux gaming rig - ha, ha, ha - has an AMD FX-8320. I've thought about getting a Ryzen 7 2700X, but I think I'll hold out for these chips in the summer. I wouldn't be surprised if the 15% boost in single-threaded performance is an exaggeration or only applies on a few key benchmarks. But at this point waiting has become its own kind of game for me. The longer I wait, the bigger jump I get. Maybe if Zen 2 underwhelms, I'll wait for Zen 3. :D

      Gentoo/Funtoo, eh? I stick with Ubuntu/Xubuntu/Ubuntu MATE so when a friend asks for a Linux recommendation or needs help, I have up to date information and can walk through the steps they need on my own machine.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday January 15 2019, @12:46PM (1 child)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday January 15 2019, @12:46PM (#786874) Journal

        15% might be underselling it. I've also heard that we can expect a roughly 13% IPC increase (compared to Zen+) combined with clock speed increases. Even going up from 3.5 GHz to 3.6 GHz (~1.029) multiplied by 1.13 surpasses 1.15.

        Combine that with well-binned 16-core parts, and maybe you could see 2.5x the total performance in some cases (compared to 8-core).

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by bobthecimmerian on Tuesday January 15 2019, @02:07PM

          by bobthecimmerian (6834) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @02:07PM (#786887)

          Yeah, it could be awesome. One thing I am tempted to do is pick a motherboard that should be Zen 2 compatible and just buy something like a Ryzen 3 or maybe lower end Ryzen 5 for now, and then see if I can upgrade in the fall after the initial price spike on the Zen 2 parts ends. Though if they're good enough, the prices may stay high into 2020 - that would be great for AMD, not so great for my budget.

    • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:09PM (3 children)

      by Freeman (732) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:09PM (#786982) Journal

      Assuming, I had the funds to do so, this is the kind of build I would go for:

      Case: Antec Nine Hundred - $101.40 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129021 [newegg.com]
      Blu-Ray Drive: LG Electronics 14x Blu-ray burner OEM - $59.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16827136250 [newegg.com]
      Motherboard: ASRock AB350 Pro4 AM4 - $82.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157761 [newegg.com]
      RAM: G.SKILL Flare X (for AMD) 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 - $174.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820232520 [newegg.com]
      GPU: SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB 2048-Bit HBM2 - $399.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202326 [newegg.com]
      CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1700 8-Core 3.0 GHz (3.7 GHz Turbo) Socket AM4 65W - $169.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113428 [newegg.com]
      PSU: SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold (SS-650KM Active PFC F3) 650W - $90.75 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151088 [newegg.com]
      SSD: Mushkin Enhanced Pilot M.2 2280 1TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe - $194.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226886 [newegg.com]
      OS: Windows 10 64-bit Pro OEM - $139.99 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?reviews=all&Item=N82E16832588491 [newegg.com]
      Total Cost: $1,415.08 + Shipping + Tax

      Total cost could be reduced some by going with a normal size 2.5" SSD that has 1/2 to 1/4 the speed (That one I chose has 2,710 MBps Read / 1,775 MBps Write) -$90 or so, the obvious use of linux instead of windows -$139.99, 16GB instead of 32GB of RAM about -$80, a cheaper case about -$50.

      Slightly cheaper options total: $1,195.08 + Shipping + Tax
      Slightly cheaper options total on Linux: $1,055.09 + Shipping + Tax

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:16PM

        by Freeman (732) on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:16PM (#786985) Journal

        As it is, I would only need the Vega 64 and the SSD to upgrade my current machine. That would still cost me $594.98 + Shipping + Tax. Considering, I'm doing just fine with my current VR setup, I'm going to be saving up my pennies for a year or two and hopefully be able to afford a new machine at that time.

        Current VR setup is similar to that build, but I have a "standard ssd" at about 500MBps read/write, and an RX480 GPU. The only VR game I've had to really tone down the graphics for was a random tomb demo. I.E. A tourist like view of I think the tomb of Nefertari.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:30PM

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday January 15 2019, @06:30PM (#786989) Journal

        Check out https://pcpartpicker.com/ [pcpartpicker.com]

        I would say spring for the cheaper SSD ($100 / 1 TB). Sure, you get less sustained read/write, but that should almost never be an issue since a 1 Gbps internet connection would be the bottleneck or you would not be copying large amounts of data onto the drive often (secondary storage is the place for that).

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 16 2019, @12:44AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 16 2019, @12:44AM (#787140)

        32 Gb of ram and 8c/16t cpu is only 2 gb of ram per thread... you probably want at least 4 gb/thread.

(1)