Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 21 2019, @07:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the Not-kidding dept.

Chinese authorities say world's first gene-edited babies were illegal

Authorities in China say experiments which led to the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies broke the country's laws, state-run Xinhua news reported Monday. In November, Chinese scientist He Jiankui sparked international outrage when he announced that twin girls -- Lulu and Nana -- had been born with modified DNA to make them resistant to HIV. He later revealed a second woman was pregnant as a result of the research.

[...] On Monday, investigators from Guangdong Province Health Commission said that "the case has been initially identified as an explicitly state-banned human embryo-editing activity for reproductive purposes conducted by He Jiankui," Xinhua reported. The commission added that the scientist has conducted the work "In pursuit of personal fame and fortune, with self-raised funds and deliberate evasion of supervision and private recruitment of related personnel." The authorities also believe He forged both ethical review documents and blood tests to circumvent a ban on assisted reproduction for HIV-positive patients, state media reported.

[...] Authorities in China said He and any other people or institutions involved will be "dealt with seriously according to the law, and if suspected of crimes, they will be handed over to the public security bureau," according to Xinhua. "For the born babies and pregnant volunteers, Guangdong Province will work with relevant parties to perform medical observation and follow-up visits under the guidance of relevant state departments," Xinhua said, adding that born babies and pregnant volunteers will be monitored and followed-up with under the guidance of relevant state departments.

Where's the paper?

Also at TechCrunch and Newsweek.

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)
Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing)
Chinese Scientist Who Allegedly Created the First Genome-Edited Babies is Reportedly Being Detained


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

Related Stories

Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins) 50 comments

Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry

A Chinese scientist claims that he has helped make the world's first genome-edited babies — twin girls who were born this month. The announcement has provoked shock, and some outrage, among scientists around the world.

He Jiankui, a genome-editing researcher from the Southern University of Science and Technology of China in Shenzhen, says that he implanted into a woman an embryo that had been edited to disable the genetic pathway that allows a cell to be infected with HIV.

In a video posted to YouTube, He says the girls are healthy and now at home with their parents. Genome sequencing of their DNA has shown that the editing worked, and only altered the gene they targeted, he says.

The scientist's claims have not been verified through independent genome testing or published in a peer-reviewed journal. But, if true, the birth would represent a significant — and controversial — leap in the use of genome-editing. So far these tools have only be used in embryos for research, often to investigate the benefit of using them to eliminate disease-causing mutations from the human germline. But reports of off-target effects in some studies have raised significant safety concerns.

Documents posted on China's clinical trial registry show that He used the ubiquitous CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing tool to disable a gene called CCR5, which forms a protein that allows HIV to enter a cell. Genome-editing scientist Fyodor Urnov was asked to review documents that described DNA sequence analysis of human embryos and fetuses gene-edited at the CCR5 locus for an article in MIT Technology Review. "The data I reviewed are consistent with the fact that the editing has, in fact, taken place," says Urnov, from the Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences in Seattle. But he says the only way to tell if the children's genomes have been edited is to independently test their DNA.

Also at STAT News:

The Chinese university where He is an associate professor issued a statement saying that it had been unaware of his research project and that He had been on leave without pay since February, Reuters reported. The work is a "serious violation of academic ethics and standards," Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen said in the statement. The university said it would immediately launch an investigation.

See also: As a genome editing summit opens in Hong Kong, questions abound over China, and why it quietly bowed out


Original Submission

Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated) 37 comments

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)

Update: Professor He Jiankui has defended his human genome editing project at the Human Genome Editing Summit at the University of Hong Kong. Although the project has been halted, Jiankui claimed that there was potentially a second pregnancy (and a third genome-edited baby) on the way. Jiankui also said that results have been submitted for peer review, although he did not name a journal. Eight couples consisting of an HIV-positive father and HIV-negative mother participated in the study, and all medical treatment was funded by He Jiankui. The parent company of the Shenzhen hospital where the experiment was carried out said that signatures on an application to the hospital's medical ethics committee had been forged. Chinese Deputy Minister of Science and Technology Xu Nanping called the experiment unlawful. Jiankui indicated that he had consulted with ethics experts in recent years:

William Hurlbut, a senior researcher in neurobiology at the Stanford Medical School, said that he was one of the ethicists that He consulted with over the past two years. Hurlbut, who served on the U.S. president's council on bioethics, said that while he knew that He was "heading in this direction," he didn't know the full-scale of the project or that it involved implanted embryos. "I challenged him at every level, and I don't approve of what he did," said Hurlbut.

American scientist under investigation over ties to alleged genetic editing

Rice University has launched an investigation into one of its professors after reports surfaced that he is connected to alleged genetic editing in China that resulted in the birth of two babies with altered DNA. They announced the investigation Monday in the wake of reports that Dr. Michael Deem, a professor of biochemical and genetic engineering, was involved in a case in which genetic editing was performed on human embryos to alter a gene in a way to make them resistant to HIV. The university said that it had "no knowledge of this work" and that to its knowledge, the work was not performed in the U.S., where genetic editing of human embryos is illegal.

[...] Deem said he was in China when the participants agreed to genetic editing, and said they understood the risks, according to the Associated Press. Deem added that comparing the gene editing to a vaccine "might be a layman's way of describing it," according to the AP.

China orders probe into first 'gene-edited babies'

The National Health Commission said on Monday it was "highly concerned" and had ordered provincial health officials "to immediately investigate and clarify the matter". The government's medical ethics committee in Shenzhen said it was investigating the case, as was the Guangdong provincial health commission, according to Southern Metropolis Daily, a state media outlet.

Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing) 55 comments

China gene-editing scientist's project rejected for WHO database (original)

A Chinese branch of the World Health Organization has withdrawn an application to register He Jiankui's project in its clinical database. The move comes after China's government halted He's work, saying it would take a "zero tolerance attitude in dealing with dishonorable behavior" in research.

He has faced a global backlash after claiming to have produced the world's first gene-edited babies in a bid to make them HIV-resistant. The project drew international criticism for its lack of transparency, with health officials and other scientists concerned that it raises ethical questions that will taint other work in the field.

The application to enter the database of the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry was rejected because "the original applicants cannot provide the individual participants' data for reviewing," according to the registry's website.

[...] He's whereabouts are still unknown. Hong Kong newspaper Apple Daily cited unnamed sources earlier this month that the researcher was put on house arrest by his university, Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, but representatives of the university and He's lab both declined to comment.

takyon: Several news organizations reported on Dec. 3 that He Jiankui was missing.

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)


Original Submission

Chinese Scientist Who Allegedly Created the First Genome-Edited Babies is Reportedly Being Detained 17 comments

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

Chinese scientist who allegedly created the first genetically engineered babies is being detained

The Chinese scientist who shocked the world with claims of creating the first genetically engineered babies is being detained in the Chinese city of Shenzhen, according to a report in The New York Times.

[...] The Southern University of Science and Technology, based in Shenzhen, has denied the reporting around Dr. He's whereabouts and fate, telling the Times, "Right now nobody's information is accurate, only the official channels are." Meanwhile, the official channels are staying silent.

Reporters found security personnel blocking access to the residence where Dr. He is reportedly staying and others denying access to the former offices Dr. He used to conduct his research. The scientist's name and biography remains on a board listing staff in the university’s biology department.

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)
Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing)


Original Submission

Russian Biologist Plans to Pursue CRISPR-Edited Babies Targeting Same Gene (CCR5) as He Jiankui Did 30 comments

Russian biologist plans more CRISPR-edited babies

A Russian scientist says he is planning to produce gene-edited babies, an act that would make him only the second person known to have done this. It would also fly in the face of the scientific consensus that such experiments should be banned until an international ethical framework has agreed on the circumstances and safety measures that would justify them.

Molecular biologist Denis Rebrikov has told Nature he is considering implanting gene-edited embryos into women, possibly before the end of the year if he can get approval by then. Chinese scientist He Jiankui prompted an international outcry when he announced last November that he had made the world's first gene-edited babies — twin girls.

The experiment will target the same gene, called CCR5, that He did, but Rebrikov claims his technique will offer greater benefits, pose fewer risks and be more ethically justifiable and acceptable to the public. Rebrikov plans to disable the gene, which encodes a protein that allows HIV to enter cells, in embryos that will be implanted into HIV-positive mothers, reducing the risk of them passing on the virus to the baby in utero. By contrast, He modified the gene in embryos created from fathers with HIV, which many geneticists said provided little clinical benefit because the risk of a father passing on HIV to his children is minimal.

[...] "The technology is not ready," says Jennifer Doudna, a University of California Berkeley molecular biologist who pioneered the CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing system that Rebrikov plans to use. "It is not surprising, but it is very disappointing and unsettling."

Alta Charo, a researcher in bioethics and law at the University of Wisconsin-Madison says Rebrikov's plans are not an ethical use of the technology. "It is irresponsible to proceed with this protocol at this time," adds Charo, who sits on a World Health Organization committee that is formulating ethical governance policies for human genome editing.

Third time's the charm? I guess they won't pick a genetic disease to target instead since preimplantation genetic diagnosis can already handle that. Others will have to resort to gene therapy after the child is born.

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)
Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing)
Chinese Scientist Who Allegedly Created the First Genome-Edited Babies is Reportedly Being Detained
China Confirms That He Jiankui Illegally Edited Human Embryo Genomes
China's CRISPR Babies Could Face Earlier Death

Related: HIV Reportedly Cured In A Second Patient


Original Submission

CRISPR Scientist Who Made Gene-Edited Babies Sentenced to 3 Years in Prison 4 comments

CRISPR scientist who made gene-edited babies sentenced to 3 years in prison:

The scientist who claimed to have created the first gene-edited human babies was fined around $430,000 and sentenced to three years in prison by a Chinese court on Monday, according to Chinese state media. He Jiankui was reportedly convicted of conducting an "illegal medical practice."

A court in Shenzhen reportedly found He, along with two colleagues, violated Chinese regulations and ethics by editing twin embryos' DNA. Authorities also found his team fabricated regulatory paperwork, according to state news agency Xinhua. He and his colleagues reportedly pleaded guilty to the charges.

He was condemned by the scientific community for using the gene-editing technology CRISPR to alter the gene CCR5, which HIV utilizes when infecting humans.

Previously:
One of CRISPR's Inventors Calls for Controls on Gene-Editing Technology
Russian Biologist Plans to Pursue CRISPR-Edited Babies Targeting Same Gene (CCR5) as He Jiankui Did
China's CRISPR Babies Could Face Earlier Death
China Confirms That He Jiankui Illegally Edited Human Embryo Genomes
Chinese Scientist Who Allegedly Created the First Genome-Edited Babies is Reportedly Being Detained
Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)
Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Monday January 21 2019, @07:59PM (7 children)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 21 2019, @07:59PM (#789739) Journal

    I made the assertion that it was good because the application was for legitimate medical reasons that posed life-threatening risks to patients, and all FUD about the "risks" of genome editing were stupid and facile in the face of actual application.

    I would like to revise my position on the grounds that what I said was dumb, and any experimental medical treatment that forges ethics reviews is not an experimental treatment at all, and just insane human experimentation well outside the bounds of best practices.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:30PM (#789750)

      any experimental medical treatment that forges ethics reviews is not an experimental treatment at all

      Your blind trust in the review board is quite misguitded. The Chinese "ban on assisted reproduction for HIV-positive patients" is how the Chinese government is doing away with its poor, excess males, non-Han and homosexuals: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31541-0/fulltext [thelancet.com]

      There's a separate article about sex-ed and how the curriculum is broken down per province that similarly shows the poor are encouraged to practice unsafe sex with pills while the Han urbanites are told to use condoms.

      It's such old news it got into the Warhammer 40k fluff in the Tau backstory a decade ago... And the evidence proving they're doing it keep piling up every population survey.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:54PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:54PM (#789763)

      How do we know he didn't forge the results? Until someone can follow his instructions and replicate this then who cares? Plus his results looked too good to be true since the "genetically modified" embryos actually survived better than normal ones. Since when does chopping up their dna lead to increased survival of embryos?

      • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Monday January 21 2019, @09:06PM

        by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 21 2019, @09:06PM (#789776) Journal

        Yeah, that's exactly why routine trivial violations of medical research process guidelines are enough to completely reverse my perception of the whole thing. Science, as a process, is more vulnerable to fraud and lax procedure than we usually give it credit for.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @11:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @11:27PM (#789846)

      Thanks for revising your position. It is sad how rare that seems to be these days.

      HIV was not a legitimate medical risk to the babies as the mother was HIV negative and, even if she were HIV positive, there are treatment protocols that substantially reduce vertical transmission. Furthermore, there was no need to edit the germline since the same method (mutating CCR5) can be and has been safely done in adult bone marrow.

      If the disease were something untreatable and/or transmission could not be avoided (e.g. Huntington's disease or ALS), then there would at least be a risk/benefit point to be made for the babies but He Jiankui seems to have had other priorities than their well being.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15166829 [nih.gov]

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:05AM (2 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:05AM (#789894) Journal

      He Jiankui didn't perform a particularly valuable experiment. But the future is clear. It includes parents, or even lone individuals, designing the genomes of their customized children. And it won't be stopped.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:19AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:19AM (#789900)

        It should be self limiting as the children will either not have the desired qualities or will also have strange rare diseases.

        • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:52AM

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:52AM (#789915) Journal

          CRISPR hasn't even been around (read: known to humans) for 20 years. Other techniques [fool.com] could replace it. He Jiankui wasn't even using the most state-of-the-art CRISPR techniques. Problems with accuracy and off-target mutations will eventually be a thing of the past. But even if they weren't, you could just edit many embryos until you get it right. Or you could create synthetic embryos with synthesized DNA, i.e. going from digital genetic code to a complete embryo that could be raised in an artificial womb. Desired qualities will become easier to manage as we learn more about the genome and start throwing machine learning and more advanced computers at the problem. We should reach a point where you input genetic code, and a computer shows you what the result would look like.

          Check back in 10 years and see what the field looks like. And while it will be used by the rich first, I expect it will fall in cost until you could do it for a few thousand bucks (less if you already have the right equipment).

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @08:04PM (#789740)

    http://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/69460068 [4channel.org]

    (Also a picture of lain, who is a good girl)

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @12:40AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @12:40AM (#789875)

    Will born babies and pregnant volunteers be monitored and followed up with under the guidance of relevant state departments?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @12:45AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @12:45AM (#789879)

    I was kinda hoping China would be the birthplace of Khan, but now it is obvious, He Jiankui must travel to Mongolia to continue his work, all makes sense now.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Bot on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:33AM (2 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:33AM (#789903) Journal

    You don't give a loaded gun to a toddler and expect him not to fire it eventually.
    Probably secret research has already produced human GMO. The stakes for military purposes are too high. BTW meddling with animal GMO for military purposes is not off the table either.
    They even possibly poisoned the well with a myriad of youtube video showing fake modified humans, so that if some actual footage should surface, it would get lost in the noise. I posit this, as I posit that many older free energy videos were meant to be poisoning the well too, because people going to some length to prank people would eventually come out to grab the credits and have more fun, and that happens too rarely.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 2) by arslan on Tuesday January 22 2019, @02:18AM

      by arslan (3462) on Tuesday January 22 2019, @02:18AM (#789927)

      Of course, nothing else would explain the Kardashians or Kanye, but I digress, the bots are evolving, us meatbags have to as well.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @09:37AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @09:37AM (#790004)

      If you think the current GMO technology is of any use to the military you're giving it way too much credit. The current tools are frankly crude and the knowledge of cell operation very insufficient. The day will certainly come but it will take a century.

(1)