Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday May 16 2019, @06:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-over-MY-head dept.

Reuters:

The "great majority" of solar cells being produced at Tesla's factory in upstate New York are being sold overseas instead of being used in the company's trademark "Solar Roof" as originally intended, according to documents reviewed by Reuters.

The exporting underscores the depth of Tesla's troubles in the U.S. solar business, which the electric car maker entered in 2016 with its controversial $2.6 billion purchase of SolarCity.

Tesla has only sporadically purchased solar cells produced by its partner in the factory, Panasonic Corp, according to a Buffalo solar factory employee speaking on condition of anonymity. The rest are going largely to foreign buyers, according to a Panasonic letter to U.S. Customs officials reviewed by Reuters.

Tesla's solar cells are being bought, but not by Americans.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by zeptic on Thursday May 16 2019, @07:47AM (13 children)

    by zeptic (1172) on Thursday May 16 2019, @07:47AM (#844175)

    What's the problem? I don't get it.

    • (Score: 2) by bradley13 on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:37AM (12 children)

      by bradley13 (3053) on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:37AM (#844207) Homepage Journal

      It's just an indication: SolarCity was doomed, Tesla bought them to bail them out. Which was just dumb: one broke business buying another. The suspicion is that Musk was actually bailing out friends and relatives whom he had encouraged to invest in SolarCity.

      AFAIK, SolarCity just isn't very competitive. They made good money for a while from government subsidies, but never really from selling their products on the open market.

      --
      Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by deimtee on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:51AM (11 children)

        by deimtee (3272) on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:51AM (#844212) Journal

        Foreign buyers aren't buying them to help out Musk. Electrical power is more expensive in a lot of the rest of the world than in USA. E.g. average in AU is about US$0.20 per kw/h. When prices get that high, solar cells and an inverter make economic sense at a higher cost than they would in the USA. If Musk just sells them to the highest bidder they are all going overseas.
        In the meantime, finished goods exports help the US economy, so, agreeing with the GP post, 'what's the problem'?

        --
        If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
        • (Score: 2) by Username on Thursday May 16 2019, @12:30PM (8 children)

          by Username (4557) on Thursday May 16 2019, @12:30PM (#844242)

          Why on earth would anyone import american solar panels? That's the problem I see. All the parts come from china, so it's not a quality difference. Since the parts have to be imported from china, assembled by americans, exported to desired country, there is a x2 additional cost on transportation and tariffs plus american wages. So I doubt it is cheaper. Just the brand name? Can anyone tell the difference between Tesla panels and nobrand panels? Like a big logo on the roof.

          • (Score: 1, Informative) by c0lo on Thursday May 16 2019, @12:49PM (2 children)

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 16 2019, @12:49PM (#844247) Journal

            Why on earth would anyone import american solar panels?

            If I'm not mistaken, TFA is about batteries not PV panels.
            And, for the moment, the Chinese are busy consuming theirs on public buses and electric cars for their own market.

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
            • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday May 16 2019, @01:34PM (1 child)

              by Immerman (3985) on Thursday May 16 2019, @01:34PM (#844267)

              First line of the summary:
              >The "great majority" of solar cells being produced at Tesla's factory in upstate New York are being sold overseas

              Not batteries or even "solar system components", solar cells specifically.

              • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday May 16 2019, @03:21PM

                by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 16 2019, @03:21PM (#844304) Journal

                My bad. Overworked.

                --
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
          • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Immerman on Thursday May 16 2019, @02:03PM (1 child)

            by Immerman (3985) on Thursday May 16 2019, @02:03PM (#844273)

            They specifically say the *cells* are being made here, so exactly what parts are you talking about coming from China? Raw silicon? Foil backing? Wiring? The protective case of the panel?

            Cells are the functional component, and so the place where quality control matters the most. It also sounds like the Tesla factory is actually using a still-uncommon manufacturing process which presumably has at least slightly different strengths and weaknesses than other techniques, and there may be some purchasers who are specifically looking to promote further development and maturation of the process. They're also manufactured under the U.S.'s much more restrictive pollution and labor laws, which will matter to some customers.

            • (Score: 2) by Username on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:41PM

              by Username (4557) on Thursday May 16 2019, @10:41PM (#844494)

              Well, the story also says tesla buys cells from panasonic. Seems odd a company would make cells then buy them. I just assumed the first part was a typo and they meant the final panel.

          • (Score: 2) by Spamalope on Thursday May 16 2019, @02:32PM

            by Spamalope (5233) on Thursday May 16 2019, @02:32PM (#844281) Homepage

            Why? Tax dodge?
            Most of the cost is in assembly.
            Export US made cells; Create panels in China; Import 'US' panels with no tariff!

          • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday May 16 2019, @06:13PM

            by bob_super (1357) on Thursday May 16 2019, @06:13PM (#844385)

            > Why on earth would anyone import american solar panels?

            The point is they do.
            American manufacturing making export goods. It's a very good thing.
            It also shows that Tesla's solar branch isn't using its capacity, which is bad for Tesla, but given that installations are still climbing, it also means that the competitors are doing well, which is also good.

            If installations were going down, or if Tesla/Panasonic didn't find buyers for its cells, that would be bad.

            The negative angle is just because of the Tesla magnifying lens. But overall, it's not a bad situation.

          • (Score: 2) by exaeta on Thursday May 16 2019, @08:16PM

            by exaeta (6957) on Thursday May 16 2019, @08:16PM (#844446) Homepage Journal
            I have experience with solar cells. They are much cheaper to transport than solar panels. By a facor of around 3 to 5. E.g. the cost of importing 100 solar cells is around the same as a 24-cell panel. The cells stack and can be transported easily, the panels are much less dense and heavier. If you have the ability to assemble panels yourself, it makes sense to do so as the full panel takes up a lot more volume. Buying cells makes more sense to assemble them locally and reduce transport cost to the end customer.
            --
            The Government is a Bird
        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday May 16 2019, @03:55PM (1 child)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 16 2019, @03:55PM (#844314) Journal

          That ^

          For as long as the US has produced solar panels, most of our solar panels have been exported. I've read that bit of trivia several times, in the past three decades. Here, in the US, electricity is cheap enough that even our poor people can waste electricity. Few really care about solar, here in the states. And, that's just the way the producers want it. Shipping their product overseas, where it is valuable, means that the relatively few panels they sell here command top dollar.

          Sure, an American can go off grid, with a few solar panels, and a wind turbine. But, he's going to pay big money, or he'll do without.

          • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Friday May 17 2019, @07:45AM

            by deimtee (3272) on Friday May 17 2019, @07:45AM (#844636) Journal

            In the rest of the world there is still a perceived (and probably actual) difference in quality between something that has a sticker that says "Made in China" vs one that says "Made in America". Given exchange rates and transport costs, something that is worth exporting from the USA is probably high quality. If you were just going for the cheapest stuff you would end up with "Made in China".

            --
            If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 16 2019, @01:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 16 2019, @01:22PM (#844261)

    From the local Buffalo News,
    https://buffalonews.com/2019/05/15/tesla-is-adding-new-products-in-buffalo-as-its-solar-business-slumps/ [buffalonews.com]

    This is about the solar cell plant (not a battery plant). The facility was built by NY State and is used by both Tesla and Panasonic.

    ? There may be some confusion because the Buffalo "Riverbend" plant has also been called a "gigafactory", same name attached to the Nevada battery factory, but based on 1000 MW of yearly cell production capacity.

    "In addition to scaling production of Solar Roof, Tesla is also diversifying its presence in Buffalo by manufacturing and assembling Supercharger and energy storage components at Gigafactory 2," a Tesla spokeswoman said in a statement. "We’re committed to investing in Buffalo and the state, and the new power electronic lines will deliver more high tech jobs while supporting Tesla’s energy storage products and global Supercharging infrastructure."

    Tesla's employment in Buffalo easily topped its target of bringing 500 jobs here by the end of April. But Tesla will have a much harder task meeting its next employment goal, which will require it to roughly double its employment to 1,460 people between itself and Panasonic by the end of April 2020.

    "We are pleased that Tesla is reporting that it has exceeded its job and investment commitments, invested $381 million over the course of the project, and become host to nearly 800 full-time employees working at the manufacturing facility," said Pamm Lent, an Empire Development Corp. spokeswoman. "In the coming weeks, ESD will perform the necessary due diligence to verify the data provided by Tesla.”

    Doubling the Riverbend factory's employment will be a big challenge at a time when Tesla's solar energy business is shrinking – not growing – and the solar roof product that the company expects to account for much of Tesla's production in Buffalo is still being developed and tested.

    Tesla's first-quarter solar installations plunged by 38 percent from a year ago and are at their lowest level in more than five years. Not once since the fall of 2013 had Tesla – or SolarCity before it – installed less than 73 megawatts of solar generating capacity during a single quarter. In the first quarter of this year, it installed just 47 megawatts – less than a third of what it did during the same period just two years ago.

    That puts Tesla on pace for less than 200 megawatts of solar installations this year – just a fraction of the 1,000-megawatt production capacity of the Buffalo factory. In response, Tesla late last month said it was slashing the price of its residential rooftop solar systems in a bid to increase sales, while also limiting the sizes of its solar arrays to standardized increments and pushing customers to order online as a way of reducing costs.

(1)