Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 24 2019, @05:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the wash-your-troubles-down-the-drain dept.

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

Washington State University researchers have developed an environmentally-friendly, plant-based material that for the first time works better than Styrofoam for insulation.

The foam is mostly made from nanocrystals of cellulose, the most abundant plant material on earth. The researchers also developed an environmentally friendly and simple manufacturing process to make the foam, using water as a solvent instead of other harmful solvents.

The work, led by Amir Ameli, assistant professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, and Xiao Zhang, associate professor in the Gene and Linda School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, is published in the journal Carbohydrate Polymers.

[...]The material that they created contains a uniform cellular structure that means it is a good insulator. For the first time, the researchers report, the plant-based material surpassed the insulation capabilities of Styrofoam. It is also very lightweight and can support up to 200 times its weight without changing shape. It degrades well, and burning it doesn’t produce polluting ash.

Source: https://news.wsu.edu/2019/05/09/researchers-develop-viable-environmentally-friendly-alternative-styrofoam/


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @06:19AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @06:19AM (#846964)

    Give me the plant or fungi version any day.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @07:08AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @07:08AM (#846968)

    How well? I do not want to replace the insulation in the wall every year. I also don't want mice eating it all up. Being a plant based carbohydrate, I bet it would be fairly tasty to rodents.

    • (Score: 2) by KritonK on Friday May 24 2019, @07:26AM (2 children)

      by KritonK (465) on Friday May 24 2019, @07:26AM (#846971)

      Given that this is a form of cellulose, another form of which is wood, I would think that it degrades the same as wood, which, properly maintained, may last for centuries, but is vulnerable to rot, mold, and termites.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bradley13 on Friday May 24 2019, @09:05AM (1 child)

        by bradley13 (3053) on Friday May 24 2019, @09:05AM (#846984) Homepage Journal

        Inside a house, it is normally too dry for insects and fungus to be a problem. However, insulation will be subject to damp. Dunno if bugs like to eat cellulose, but fungus certainly will.

        There are various forms of cellulose insulation [greenbuildingadvisor.com] on the market, so this isn't an unknown problem. Other forms of cellulose insulation are treated with borates [orst.edu] to fend off fungus and insects. Presumably this styrofoam replacement would be as well. Borates are apparently considered to be quite safe for humans.

        --
        Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
        • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Friday May 24 2019, @04:01PM

          by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 24 2019, @04:01PM (#847134) Journal

          I don't think borates are particularly safe for humans, though boric acid has been used as an eye-wash. But they don't usually tend to be volatile, and they aren't especially poisonous. (That said, that's too much of a generalization, as the compound is often quite different from the element.) https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=451&tid=80 [cdc.gov]

          And excess boron doesn't accumulate in the body, so a small exposure isn't a problem.

          --
          Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Friday May 24 2019, @08:06AM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Friday May 24 2019, @08:06AM (#846975)

      Doesn't have to be particularly tasty for rodents [etymonline.com] to want/need to gnaw on them.

  • (Score: 2) by corey on Friday May 24 2019, @10:21AM

    by corey (2202) on Friday May 24 2019, @10:21AM (#847003)

    Thank fuck. Get that shit into production ASAP.

    I like the postage filler stuff made of rice. Nice to eat too.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday May 24 2019, @11:32AM (3 children)

    Now the question that matters: how expensive is it? If it's 2x, yay! If it's 10x, it's neat trivia but nothing more. Engineers, unlike scientists, have to live in the real world.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by j-beda on Friday May 24 2019, @01:24PM (2 children)

      by j-beda (6342) on Friday May 24 2019, @01:24PM (#847047) Homepage

      Now the question that matters: how expensive is it? If it's 2x, yay! If it's 10x, it's neat trivia but nothing more. Engineers, unlike scientists, have to live in the real world.

      I wish everything had all the externalities priced into them. If disposal and pollution and carbon had more accurate prices attached to them, probably Styrofoam would not be as cheap and it would be a lot easier to compare the real costs of different alternatives.

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @01:38PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @01:38PM (#847051)

        I wish everything had all the externalities priced into them.

        I sometimes suggest to free marketeers that we strip mine the planet, process all the materials, throw the result into landfills, and hand a bunch of money to people who are already very rich. You know, give the market what it wants.

      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday May 25 2019, @01:19AM

        That would indeed help. You've got a pretty epic uphill battle to get that enacted though.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @01:57PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @01:57PM (#847060)

    Until they begin making synthetic ground beef out of this stuff.

    Oh, wait, ...

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @10:42PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @10:42PM (#847393)

    do we get the good McDonalds burger packaging back?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @11:12PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @11:12PM (#847406)

      Kind of, but it will be more depressing [eater.com].

(1)