Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 10 2019, @05:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the You've-got-to-know-when-to-hold-'em,-know-when-to-fold-'em dept.

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

Instead of maximizing pixel density to fit more info on a smartwatch's tiny screen, IBM has patented a radically different approach that promises to change how we think about wrist wearables completely. But given the trouble companies have had with rolling out expanding screen smartphones, it's hard to imagine this wearable ever being technically feasible.

[...] the patent describes a unique expanding screen system using sliding panels hidden beneath the wearable's main housing. The panels can be removed and connected to expand the wearable's screen real estate into something closer to what a smartphone affords through a four-by-four array, allowing you to display more widgets or to open more capable applications. But why stop there? IBM's patent suggests the modular screen could be expanded with up to eight connected panels, resulting in a display as large as a phone or small tablet awkwardly perched on your wrist.

Source: https://gizmodo.com/ibm-patents-a-smartwatch-that-transforms-into-a-giant-a-1836211325


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:16AM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:16AM (#865299)
    They're just patenting it so they can collect tolls if someone else actually implements it and it somehow becomes popular enough. Patent tolling? ;)

    To me augmented reality glasses would eliminate the need for such watches (and reduce the need for physically large screens) and the watches you'd wear would be for decorative/fashion purposes or for specialized sectors where AR glasses are not viable (e.g. diving watch).
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:21AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:21AM (#865303) Journal

      AR glasses are a good idea. We could even have hybrid AR/VR glasses (retinal projection, cover to block light). But a smartwatch might be nice if it could project a hologram (movie style).

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:20AM (6 children)

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:20AM (#865306) Journal

      To me augmented reality glasses would eliminate the need for such watches (and reduce the need for physically large screens) and the watches you'd wear would be for decorative/fashion purposes or

      I wouldn't mind a wide cuff or even vambrace [wikipedia.org] form tablet though. I suspect it would be easier to achieve than a truly foldable form, and one could even fit a physical keyboard - slide out or not.
      Granted, should be rugged enough - thicker gorilla glass (leading to thicker gorilla arm).

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:35AM (5 children)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:35AM (#865307) Journal

        How about a full powered exoskeleton suit, with a display covering the entire body, allowing it to display texts, video, optical camouflage, etc.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:50AM (4 children)

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 10 2019, @07:50AM (#865309) Journal

          How about a full powered exoskeleton suit, with a display covering the entire body, allowing it to display texts, video, optical camouflage, etc.

          I'm waiting for the P-5000 power loader for ages and it should be simpler than what you describe. Glad I haven't held my breath.

          Besides, a "wide cuff format" for a wearable-tablet is not even a jump ahead of today's technology, so I don't get why your sarcasm (as diluted as it may be).

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by pipedwho on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:12AM (1 child)

    by pipedwho (2032) on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:12AM (#865312)

    ‘futures’ patents where a patent is taken out on something that no one actually knows how to do are a scourge. The idea is to patent something that would be obvious to anyone that actually developed/invented techniques to achieve something, but don’t exist yet. This blocks new inventions from being implemented and actively discourages people to invent things that might be awesome, but now risk limited application due to these sort of patents.

    Now this would be a different story if IBM could actually make this work, but I’m pretty confident we don’t have the technology today to achieve the overly broad ‘land grab’ concepts they describe in their patent.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 10 2019, @01:19PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 10 2019, @01:19PM (#865362)

      Given their butterfly keyboard, I'd think IBM is likely closer to implementing this than their competitors.

  • (Score: 2) by inertnet on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:49AM

    by inertnet (4071) on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:49AM (#865319) Journal

    That thing is going to cause a lot of cases of RSI, because people will twist their wrist until the battery dies.

  • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:55PM

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Wednesday July 10 2019, @06:55PM (#865462) Journal
    --
    This sig for rent.
  • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:06PM (1 child)

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday July 10 2019, @08:06PM (#865480)

    I just want to know how many times the image in that article has been printed out, faxed, scanned in, processed on a 386 with monochrome graphics, then printed again. The dithering looks like it is from the late 80's or early 90's.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(1)