Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday August 13 2019, @05:59PM   Printer-friendly

Snap announces Spectacles 3 with an updated design and a second HD camera

Snap today announced Spectacles 3, a redesigned version of its augmented reality sunglasses with a sleek new design and an added HD camera to create depth perception. The glasses, which the company has positioned as a limited release, represent Snap's latest effort to build a new computing platform centered on the face. They will go on sale on Spectacles.com in November for $380.

That makes them more than twice as expensive as last year's model, which cost $150. Snap executives say the higher-end version is meant to appeal to a smaller group of "fashion-forward" creative types. It may also be designed to recoup more of its manufacturing costs for the famously money-losing product; Snapchat wrote down nearly $40 million in costs associated with the first version of the glasses after wildly overestimating demand.

The high price of Spectacles 3 will likely limit their appeal, particularly among the high school and college-age students who make up Snapchat's core user base. A Snap spokesperson said this year's model represented a necessary investment in the platform. The company has to figure out a way to do AR computing right, the logic goes, before it can do it cheaply.

Not quite VR180 given the 1216×1216 video.

Previously: Snapchat's Spectacles: A Bad Idea in Hindsight
Snapchat Takes a Second Shot at Wearable Camera "Spectacles"
Snap Gives Spectacles a Face Lift to Look More Like Traditional Sunglasses
Instagram "Influencer" Sued for $90,000 for Not Sufficiently Sporting Snapchat's Spectacles
Snap Will Reportedly Release AR-Enabled Spectacles With Dual Cameras


Original Submission

Related Stories

Snapchat's Spectacles: A Bad Idea in Hindsight 8 comments

Snap's take on smartglasses has reportedly failed to live up to expectations:

A year ago, Snapchat was so excited about its first hardware product that it renamed itself Snap Inc. With the launch of Spectacles, CEO Evan Spiegel decided, the company would no longer be defined solely by the Snapchat app. It was not a social media company, he told the Wall Street Journal, but a camera company. Internet-connected photography, he philosophized, necessitated a "a reinvention of the camera."

Yeah, not so much. Citing "two people close to the company," the Information reported Monday that Snap had "badly overestimated demand" and now has "hundreds of thousands of unsold units sitting in warehouses, either fully assembled or in parts." This comes just weeks after Spiegel said at a Vanity Fair summit that Spectacles sales had "exceeded our expectations," topping 150,000. If the Information's reporting is accurate, then Spiegel's claim, well ... isn't. (A Snap spokesperson declined my request for comment.)

Regardless of who's telling the truth, it already seemed clear from Snap's first two earnings reports that Spectacles were fizzling. As Business Insider pointed out in August, the company reported just $5.4 million in "other" revenue in its second quarter, down from $8.3 million in its first quarter. Spectacles are presumed to make up the bulk of revenue in this category. It's one thing to only sell 150,000 of a product in its first year, as long as sales are growing. If they're already tailing off, that suggests the product might be doomed.

The devices let users record 10-30 seconds of video at a time. They are transferred to a smartphone wirelessly and can then be uploaded to Snapchat.

Snapchat Takes a Second Shot at Wearable Camera "Spectacles" 10 comments

Despite disappointing results for its first (test?) run, Snap(chat) has released a second generation of its Spectacles wearable camera:

Snap today released the next generation of Spectacles, its wearable camera, with new features for taking photos and water resistance. The sunglasses, which have the same striking form as the first-generation model, have been slimmed down and now come in three jewel tones: onyx (black), ruby (red), and sapphire (blue). They're available to order starting today at Spectacles.com for $150 — $20 more than the previous model.

If you've followed the story of Spectacles so far, you know that the first version proved to be a costly misstep for Snap Inc. Although reviewers were generally impressed with their whimsical design, Snap made far more units than the 150,000 or so that it ultimately sold. The company wrote down nearly $40 million in merchandise, and laid off about a dozen people.

Even worse, from the company's perspective, is that people who bought Spectacles didn't use them for very long. According to Business Insider, less than half of users continued to use Spectacles a month after buying them. They were presented as the future of communication, but the first iteration of Spectacles felt more like a toy — a relatively cheap novelty that people used a handful of times before stuffing into a drawer.

Also at TechCrunch, The Guardian, Adweek, and Macworld.


Original Submission

Snap Gives Spectacles a Face Lift to Look More Like Traditional Sunglasses 11 comments

The company formerly known as Snapchat is launching new styles for its wearable camera glasses:

If the main hangup that's kept you from purchasing Snap's Spectacles has been their design, two new models that the company is introducing today might eliminate those hesitations. Snap has just announced the new Veronica and Nico styles of Spectacles 2. They contain all the same features and recording quality improvements as the model first introduced in April, but this time inside a more traditional look. It maybe won't be quite so obvious that you're wearing Spectacles anymore.

The new models of Spectacles are also different in a couple of other ways: they've got polarized lenses, and they come with a nondescript, black "semi-soft" case instead of the bright yellow hard case you get with the original Spectacles 2. Both the Veronica and Nico styles are available starting today for $199 in "limited quantities" at launch. This fall, they'll also be sold at select Nordstrom and Neiman Marcus stores in the US and a variety of retailers in Europe. And like before, Snap's partner Lensabl will let customers order prescription lenses for their glasses. Both models are only available in black for the time being.

Snap says that since the introduction of Spectacles 2, users have been posting, on average, 40 percent more photos and videos captured with the glasses. The company has also made it easier to share that content on other platforms outside Snapchat by adding automatic camera roll saves and by allowing users to export video in more conventional square and horizontal formats.

Check the article for several images of models looking cheerful while wearing the device.

Also at Engadget and TechCrunch.

Previously: Snapchat's Spectacles: A Bad Idea in Hindsight
Snapchat Takes a Second Shot at Wearable Camera "Spectacles"


Original Submission

Instagram "Influencer" Sued for $90,000 for Not Sufficiently Sporting Snapchat's Spectacles 24 comments

Snapchat's PR firm sues influencer for not promoting Spectacles on Instagram

Influencer marketing could get a lot more accountable if Snapchat's PR firm wins this lawsuit. Snapchat hoped that social media stars promoting v2 of its Spectacles camera sunglasses on its biggest competitor could boost interest after it only sold 220,000 of v1 and had to take a $40 million write-off. Instead, Snap comes off looking a little desperate to make Spectacles seem cool.

Snap Inc. commissioned its public relations firm PR Consulting (real imaginative) to buy it an influencer marketing campaign on Instagram. The firm struck a deal with Grown-ish actor Luka Sabbat after he was seen cavorting with Kourtney Kardashian. Sabbat got paid $45,000 up front with the promise of another $15,000 to post himself donning Spectacles on Instagram.

He was contracted to make one Instagram feed post and three Stories posts with him wearing Specs, plus be photographed wearing them in public at Paris and Milan Fashion Weeks. He was supposed to add swipe-up-to-buy links to two of those Story posts, get all the posts pre-approved with PRC, and send it analytics metrics about their performance.

But Sabbat skipped out on two of the Stories, one of the swipe-ups, the photo shoots, the pre-approvals and the analytics. So as Variety's Gene Maddaus first reported, PRC is suing Sabbat to recoup the $45,000 it already paid plus another $45,000 in damages.

The lawsuit might give Spectacles more exposure than Mr. Sabbat would have.

Also at Business Insider, Engadget, and Entrepreneur.

Previously: Snapchat's Spectacles: A Bad Idea in Hindsight
Snapchat Takes a Second Shot at Wearable Camera "Spectacles"
Snap Gives Spectacles a Face Lift to Look More Like Traditional Sunglasses


Original Submission

Snap Will Reportedly Release AR-Enabled Spectacles With Dual Cameras 10 comments

Submitted via IRC for takyon

Snap will reportedly release AR-enabled Spectacles with dual cameras

Snap is reportedly set to release a new version of Spectacles with an aluminum design that packs in two cameras. Through the Snapchat app, you may be able to add augmented reality overlay effects in videos you capture with the updated Spectacles. The $350 frames will cost more than double the first version, which arrived in 2016, and will be on sale by the end of the year, according to Cheddar.

Following a $40 million write-down on the first version after Snap overestimated demand (it ordered around 800,000 pairs), it has been more conservative with orders of the device. For the second version of Spectacles, which were released earlier this year, Snap reportedly ordered 35,000 pairs, and 52,000 of a tweaked set it released in September. This time around, it's hedging its bets further by ordering around 24,000, according to the report.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday August 13 2019, @06:25PM (3 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday August 13 2019, @06:25PM (#879772)

    Whatever the (glasshole) market will bear.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:04PM (2 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:04PM (#879789) Journal

      Having one and only one style makes these instantly recognizable. They need to come in multiple styles, colors, lens shapes, etc.

      --
      The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
      • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday August 13 2019, @09:03PM (1 child)

        by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday August 13 2019, @09:03PM (#879827)

        Yeah, that was my thought too.

        Spectacles are personal and when I go to buy some new ones the shop has hundreds of styles, only a few of which appeal to me.

        I don't particularly like either colour on offer here and I'm not sure the shape would suit my face.

        Having said that, as they don't include my prescription so I wouldn't be able to see out of them anyway. Also, lo-res cameras on my face? Why?

        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday August 13 2019, @09:33PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 13 2019, @09:33PM (#879834) Journal

          My point was to have enough styles so the glasses are not instantly recognizable. I'm just thinking of the trouble with Google Glass back in ancient times. People getting randomly attacked for using a tech product.

          I do understand that there are irresponsible ways to use these products. But people can do with without special glasses.

          --
          The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday August 13 2019, @06:40PM

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday August 13 2019, @06:40PM (#879781) Journal

    This is why they can't sell this shit. It's always some half-assed design. We want the ass, whole!

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:02PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:02PM (#879788) Journal

    I'll stick with FlatPack or AppImage.

    Cameras good. Not so interested in the VR just yet. But augmented reality might be interesting. Just looking at a person brings up their entire life history. Google could get into this.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:20PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 13 2019, @07:20PM (#879800)

      Thanks, but the glasshole fad has passed.

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:23AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:23AM (#879933) Journal

      Just looking at a person brings up their entire life history.

      Not gonna happen, lizard-people won't like it.
      (people-people even less).

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 13 2019, @10:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 13 2019, @10:44PM (#879862)

    I had a situation where I was being stalked for some time. I needed to be able to quickly capture what was going on around me in public with a preference to my stalker not knowing he was being recorded. They won't convict without evidence. They won't start a case of stalking by a male without evidence. The solution was a pair of glasses with a sim card sized storage unit and a camera built into the frames right between the eyes. It worked great when it worked. Turning it on was a pain. It crashed. When it did record it really was worth it. I was able to walk around capturing video of a high enough standard to be able to use in court.

    I can't see a use for this style of spyware out in the world. There's normally no need to record everything around you. Unless you live in a dangerous place where people or animals attack and authorities refuse to do anything meaningful about it or just outright deny what happens.

    Yes I could pull my phone out, wake it up, unlock it, turn on the camera, and start recording. It's much easier to push a button and start capturing when some idiot is breaking the law in front of you.

(1)