Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
[In Australia,] State's upper house drags feet in passing law legalising abortion despite an overwhelming 75-percent support by voters.
The Reproductive Health Care Act 2019, which seeks to bring the state in line with the rest of Australia, would allow abortion up to 22 weeks. It was passed by the state lower house in August, with 59 votes in favour and 31 against. The bill's backers say the change will protect women and reduce some of the stigma associated with the procedure, but the legislation has attracted intense debate and national attention.
Barnaby Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, claimed the bill ignored the rights of unborn children and, at an anti-abortion rights rally over the weekend, former prime minister Tony Abbott alleged the move to decriminalise would enable "infanticide on demand".
Terminations have existed in a legal grey area - allowed for health or economic reasons, but still carrying a risk of prosecution. "We need to take abortion out of the Crimes Act and give women autonomy over their decisions," Family Planning NSW Medical Director Dr Deborah Bateson told Al Jazeera.
A survey released this month by Pro-Choice NSW showed that more than 77 percent of the state's residents support decriminalisation.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @12:24AM (30 children)
Whether it's who to have sex with, who to marry, or terminating a pregnancy, if it's not your body that is being affected, it's not your choice.
If men got pregnant, abortion would be available for free on demand and come with beer and pizza.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @12:30AM (4 children)
I don't recall vasectomy being free or covered by insurance, and it certainly doesn't come with beer and pizza (paid out of someone elses pocket)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @06:09AM (1 child)
It should be free or covered by insurance. Happy?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @09:40AM
Not without beer and pizza, no.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday September 20 2019, @06:24PM (1 child)
Health insurance usually covers vasectomies, although you may be required to use an in-network doctor and/or pay a copay or coinsurance costs. If you do have to pay out of pocket, vasectomies may be more affordable than many other types of care procedures, and you may be able to finance the operation over time. [lendedu.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 21 2019, @04:08AM
My insurance only covers vasectomies if it is a "family plan," as opposed to "single plan." My guess is that they want to cover vasectomies in that case because it is a heck of a lot cheaper to pay for the vasectomy than it is to pay for the obstetric and pediatric care under the family plan.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 20 2019, @12:38AM (14 children)
As AC has already stated - bullshit. Men do not get any free services from the government. If men DID get free services from the government, women long ago would have demanded, and received, similar services. If you want to dig into inequalities mandated by government, maybe you should look at the draft. Every male in this country has to register for the draft. No women are registering. If women start flocking to the federal buildings in this nation to register for the draft, it might attract some attention. But, most women are too smart to want to trudge through the mud to shoot up whatever some politician wants shot up.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @06:11AM (1 child)
Solution: Recognize the draft as what it is - a form of slavery - and strip the government of its power to even call for a draft under any circumstances. There, an inequality solved the right way.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @04:28PM
We tried that the first time and the government fell apart. The current United States of America is our second attempt at a government. Please learn your history before pushing for things that have been shown not to work.
(Score: 4, Touché) by VLM on Friday September 20 2019, @11:31AM (1 child)
Sure they do, child support enforcement will be all over them if the girl decides NOT to get an abortion.
Female attention whores need to get all dressed up and show off the goods, male attention whores just need to get some girl pregnant and they'll get more attention from Big Brother than they can even imagine...
(Score: 2) by Freeman on Friday September 20 2019, @02:19PM
Quite sure he meant free services that are beneficial to the person they are effecting. As opposed to say, a bank robber's free services by the FBI to track them down.
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @06:04PM (5 children)
Free vasectomies, free treatment for prostate diseases, free treatments for erectile dysfunction - much of the world consider this to be a basic right for men.
Or you can continue to vote for money for obsolete F35 jets that can't take out a drone costing 1/1000 the price. Ask Saudi Arabia how naked they feel with all that latest tech. As always, you keep spending money to fight the previous war, even as the nature of warfare changes every generation.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday September 21 2019, @02:07PM (4 children)
Uhhhhhmmmmmmm - waitaminnit. I should petition my representatives to cut my nuts, and to do it for free? You can be whatever, Barbie, but fuck if I'm going to ask my government to cut on men's manhood.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 27 2019, @04:47PM (3 children)
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 27 2019, @11:21PM (2 children)
Nice change of subject. A vasectomy has almost zero relationship to repairing combat damage. Or, non-combat damage for that matter.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Saturday September 28 2019, @12:28AM (1 child)
It's also one way to help deaf with the climate crisis and too many people competing for ever fewer resources such as clean air and water.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday September 28 2019, @03:20PM
You're being - what? Intentionally obtuse? Whether it's a snip-snip-snip, or a knife stroke, or whatever, a vasectomy involves a "cut".
If it's done with a meat cleaver, or an IUD, or a poleaxe, there's a "cut".
So, even your "no cut" vasectomy involves a cut.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 21 2019, @04:15AM (3 children)
At least they can register now. Up until February of this year (2019) it was literally illegal for them to sign up for the Selective Service. The funny thing about that is that most of the people I know personally who are the most ardent "4th wave" feminists were actively bitching about the women who brought the lawsuit for selling out womankind instead of supporting their fight for literal equal treatment under the law.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 27 2019, @05:02PM (2 children)
Those of us who want equal rights want them for everyone, not just the privileged. It's going to take a long time for everyone to accept male nurses, for example. Or getting rid of the consept of discrimination in "safe spaces", or just the idea of safe spaces - every space should be safe for everyone, and anything less than that means we have more work to do. "Safe spaces " are an excuse to ignore the underlying problems while claiming to be making progress, kind of like turning up the AC to fix global heating.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 27 2019, @06:35PM (1 child)
5th vaporwave feminist tribalism is going to be great. That's where women form heavily armed manless communes and create synthetic embryos to reproduce. Females only, although they could make male children to molest and exile them at puberty.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Saturday September 28 2019, @12:45AM
On a somewhat related note, since men still mostly want younger women, and women live longer than men on average, it would be logical for women to be more open to same-sex relationships as the default long-term relationship, rather than being doomed to spending a large chunk of the end of their lives playing nursemaid and changing diapers to cranky old men.
... and then being stuck being alone ...
... when they could have invested that time in building a relationship that wasn't doomed to end prematurely because of men's frailty as they age, as well as them becoming dangerous thanks to Alzheimer's and other dementia.
There have been a couple of documentaries about men in old age homes beating women residents to a pulp and they can't be charged because they are legally incompetent. I know one woman who had to place her husband because she was afraid after multiple police interventions with her husband, who had attacked several people, but had Alzheimer's.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @12:43AM (2 children)
Where are these doctors who are doing it for free? Where are these cost-free infrastructure?
If there's free beer and pizza, wouldn't that end world hunger? Why give it to abortionists when you can give it to all the poor regardless of whether they are pregnant?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @06:13AM (1 child)
Nowhere. Presumably, they meant that it would be covered by the universal healthcare systems that exist in every first-world country except the US. And it would still be cheaper for taxpayers than poor people having children they don't want, so it's fiscally responsible, too.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Friday September 20 2019, @11:32AM
USA is no longer a first world country by most any definition.
Back when it was, maybe when boomers were young in the 60s, health care was incredibly cheap and not an issue.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @05:19AM (4 children)
Well put. The unborn baby has a major stake in the matter.
Men don't get pregnant yet, but we generally have laws that apply to both genders, preventing us from getting rid of inconveniences by murder or abandonment.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @06:22AM (1 child)
Just like there is no right to borrow or take someone else's organs or blood to keep yourself alive, there is no human right to reside in someone else's body against their will. So, it has a stake in nothing.
And that's really the only question: Is there a general human right to forcibly use someone else's organs to keep yourself alive, or not? The answer to that question is no; there is zero precedent for such a right. So, it doesn't matter if the baby got there due to people being 'irresponsible' or not, because regardless of that, it has no right to be there. Thus, the woman can - or should be able to - terminate the pregnancy at any time.
If you weren't so massively ignorant about the severe negative effects that pregnancy and childbirth not only can have on the body, but are likely to have, then you wouldn't be using the word "inconvenience" here. I know you most likely will never have to go through either, but do some damn research before spouting ignorant tripe. You can still have stupid, wrong, and hypocritical opinions about abortion without trying to frame pregnancy and childbirth as mere "inconveniences."
(Score: 2) by Freeman on Friday September 20 2019, @02:25PM
Insane ramblings justifying the killing of innocents by Anonymous Coward, seems legit. You don't want to have a kid. Great! Don't have a kid! Just don't make choices that end up with you being pregnant. Give the kid a couple years to make up their own mind and in 99.999% of cases, the kid would choose life.
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @06:14PM
Back when you had the draft, you housed, fed, paid, and provided free health care and education to draftees. You want to require someone to be a mother for 18 years, be ready to pay for their service, same as any other draftee.
Or better yet, require that the fathers of embryos that are to be aborted submit to experimental embryo transplants using the large bowel as a placental blood supply , treatments with estrogen and testosterone-blockers, and a c section at 9 months. You get to keep the scar as a souvenir and a reminder to use birth control next time. And if you die (because pregnancy for women is much more dangerous than an abortion), too bad, should have thought about that before getting someone pregnant.
Or are you against gender equality?
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Saturday September 28 2019, @12:56AM
The whole mess was tragic enough without getting into a useless emotional debate over whether a fetus can be considered a baby. We convicted the woman, and from a practical aspect if she had been convicted of two killings instead of one, she would serve the same time since the sentences would automatically have been concurrent - the law was only recently changed (in the last couple of years) to allow for consecutive sentences, and that has opened up a can of worms and legal cases that serve no useful purpose, unless you make your money off the legal system.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Fishscene on Friday September 20 2019, @04:18PM
Whether it's who to have sex with, who to marry, or terminating a pregnancy, if it's not your body that is being affected, it's not your choice.
Who's body do you think you're killing anyway?
I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday September 20 2019, @04:48PM
You forgot: covered by health insurance
Just like boner pills are.
If you eat an entire cake without cutting it, you technically only had one piece.
(Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @12:29AM
Reproductive
Checks out
Health
Not sure thats being described
Care
Ruh Roh
Act
Well it certainly is that
(Score: 5, Insightful) by c0lo on Friday September 20 2019, @12:35AM (9 children)
77% of the population approve decriminalization of abortion.
The tactic by the News Corp newspapers and radio stations is to raise the level of noise by giving providing heaps of page space and air time to boneheads like Tony Abbot and Barnaby Joyce.
They did the same with the same-sex marriage - unfortunately for them boneheads, they directly asked the population that time.
And no, I'm not calling the characters boneheads because their stance on abortion. It is because they are proper boneheads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @12:45AM (3 children)
Your comment is fake news. The truth is that the left wants as many abortions as possible. Crooked Hillary and the anti-American squad want to kill as many babies as possible.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @12:53AM
I estimate that 90% of Australia's population are at the left of what usians call left.
Even the Australia's right is left of US center.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by julian on Friday September 20 2019, @03:54AM
Exactly. As explained by the band Copstabber, More Abortions! [youtube.com]
Really though, we want as many abortions as necessary; which will be decided by individual women and their physicians.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @06:38PM
Look at the contrast between Obama's kids and Sarah Palin's kids. It was the white Christian trash having illegitimate kids. Not the black folks.
It's the right wingers who keep cutting support for children and parents. You're not a white Christian, you should be punished for existing.
It's the same with pay equity between the sexes - at current rates it will take 85 years, unless you're black, in which case it's 275 years at current rates.
This is wrong. It's about as racist and sexist as Canada's Prime Minister going around in blackface and being unable to answer how many times he's done it.
But this is what white male privilege looks like. Totally unselfaware, going to private schools, teaching in private schools, where you are going to find nobody willing to say "dude - that's fucked up. Do that in the public school system and you're going to get the beats as a student, or fired as a teacher."
That's why we need to ban private schools, including religious schools. There's a difference between education and indoctrination, including indoctrination into white male privilege that treats women and minorities as shit to be ignored when they can't be exploited.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Friday September 20 2019, @01:19AM (4 children)
That 77%. Who are they voting for that it doesn't match up in parliament? I mean, is it possible to be pro-choice and vote for anti-choice politicians? Does that seem logical?
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Friday September 20 2019, @01:32AM (1 child)
Well, it is rational:
- it's a matter that is secondary to you and you make a compromise on it at voting time (and keep your fingers crossed that the issue won't surface); *and/or*
- it's a matter that didn't play during the electoral campaign, so you didn't know the position of the candidate you voted for.
As for the matter of being logical? I find nothing related to politics (or even democracy) as logical.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 2, Insightful) by fustakrakich on Friday September 20 2019, @03:33AM
People ignore the periphery at their own peril.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 2) by deimtee on Friday September 20 2019, @01:40AM
re. The voters: It's probably not the main issue for most of them. I would guess at least 50%, maybe as high as 90%, vote on economic grounds. Many of the rest vote based on other issues.
re. The Act: It's more about reducing stigma and improving access than stopping punishment. In the last 25 years, only 12 people have been prosecuted and 4 convicted of having an abortion. The harshest sentence was a doctor given a two-year good behaviour bond.
No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.
(Score: 2) by driverless on Friday September 20 2019, @07:33PM
Single-vote issues. "We'll vote for X because he opposes immigration, and ignore the fact that he also opposes abortion, freedom of speech, women's right to vote, anyone who isn't a Christian, and keeps a bust of Adolph Hitler on his desk".
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday September 20 2019, @12:41AM (6 children)
Now whose conservative religious leadership is forcing the population to obey "the old ways"?
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday September 20 2019, @01:12AM (3 children)
Nope, those conservatives dragging their feet are just posturing - the NSW Liberal Party (which is actually conservative) are experiencing some internal (intestinal?) power fights right now, and the challengers need a pretext [abc.net.au]. But they don't have enough numbers for a full rebellion [abc.net.au]
---
Anecdotally, in the good ol' Oz spirit, the power fight gets physical on occasions [abc.net.au]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @02:41AM (2 children)
I personally prefer a safe for work liberal party.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday September 20 2019, @03:52AM (1 child)
Contradiction in terms detected.
If it's laisser-faire (liberal), then it's not regulated thus not safe for work guaranteed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @06:41PM
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @02:54AM (1 child)
75 percent support baby murder. Interesting.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @03:25AM
Another soul mathematician, like me! That's why I voted pro abortion - to save the innocent identical twins where one kept the soul god provided, and the other was cursed to eternal damnation.
(Score: 2, Troll) by VLM on Friday September 20 2019, @11:36AM
Is there a racial component?
In Germany Hitler only got six million or so Jews, but in the USA since Roe v Wade we've killed off nineteen million blacks. The abortion rate is staggeringly higher for minorities than whites, so...
I'm sure it would just be a coincidence in AUS if the abortion rate were 10 times higher for aboriginals and non-whites in general than for whites.
Its a white privilege not to be aborted, ya know.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20 2019, @11:39AM
Abortions dont get counted in the life expectancy stats, if they did it would immediately drop it by 20-40 years. The aborted babies were the most likely to die young.
(Score: 2) by Fishscene on Friday September 20 2019, @05:45PM (6 children)
I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
(Score: 2) by Fishscene on Friday September 20 2019, @05:48PM (5 children)
Eh. Just delete my post. The formatting is non-existent and I can't edit it to fix the formatting.
I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 20 2019, @06:47PM (4 children)
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 2) by Fishscene on Friday September 20 2019, @07:14PM (3 children)
Actually, the only folks saying children are innocent (of sin) are those who don't read their Bible or are speaking from a different context. The Bible clearly teaches we were born in to sin.
An example might be: No one needs to teach a child to steal. But we spend a lot of time teaching them not to steal.
I'll toss a couple of snippets from the Bible, mostly from the Old testament since most folks have it in their head that God magically changed when He sent His son and before, that, he was a war-making backwards mongrel. (Aka putting me at a perceived disadvantage in secular eyes)
John 3:16:
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."
Psalm 123:3:
Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.
Exodus 21:22-2
“When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
Genesis 25:23
And the Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you shall be divided; the one shall be stronger than the other, the older shall serve the younger.”
Psalm 113:9
He gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children.
God is ALL about life, love, and joy. Even while in the womb he sees their future. Any Christian who advocates for the killing of children is not following God and does not know Him.
I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
(Score: 2) by driverless on Friday September 20 2019, @07:43PM (1 child)
Damn right it does, because that way we're in debt to the religious establishment from the minute we're born. Jews and Muslims have it much better, they're not automatically guilty from the minute they arrive in the world. Having said that, Christians don't need to use Shabbat elevators, so both sides have their advantages.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 21 2019, @04:39AM
It also teaches that God wants your wife to drink poison if you suspect her of cheating. And, if she is, He will abort the baby she is carrying.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday September 27 2019, @05:20PM
If your god only loves those who believe and worship it, your god is doing it wrong.
Love is not conditional. Too bad your god doesn't get it. Or give it. But then again the whole concept of a god who can influence any part of the universe, even a teeny weeny bit, without being detectable, is superstitious nonsense, same as all the other gods that came before.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.