Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday May 24 2020, @10:29AM   Printer-friendly

Anti-Piracy Lawyer Sues Torrent Sites for 'YTS' Trademark Infringement

Pirate sites regularly get into trouble for breaching copyright law. However, a new case filed in Hawaii is of an entirely different order. A well-known anti-piracy lawyer has filed a lawsuit against several YTS[*] sites because the company he represents obtained a similarly-named trademark this year. The complaint mostly targets 'clones' and the real YTS is not named.

The Hawaiian company '42 Ventures' doesn't immediately ring a bell with most torrent users. However, when we say that it owns the trademarks for 'YTS' and 'Popcorn Time,' interests will pique. Founded last year, the company doesn't operate a pirate site. On the contrary, it's represented by Kerry Culpepper, a well-known anti-piracy lawyer who works with several Hollywood film companies.

Following its inception, 42 Ventures registered several piracy-related trademarks which it uses to target pirate sites and apps, including a popular Popcorn Time fork. The lawyer has used trademark complaints to suspend Twitter accounts, offering to lift the claims in return for a settlement.

As the trademark owner 42 Ventures can do this. However, the method is unusual, to say the least, and some wonder whether it would hold up in court. The Popcorn Time dispute was never litigated though and the developers didn't pay a settlement either. The Twitter handle remains suspended.

A few days ago another trademark issue popped up. This time, 42 Ventures went directly to court where it filed an infringement lawsuit against the operators of YTS.ws, YTS.ms, YST.lt, YTS.tl, YTSag.me, YTS.ae, YTSmovies.cc and YTS-ag.com.

[*] YTS:

YIFY Torrents or YTS was a peer-to-peer release group known for distributing large numbers of movies as free downloads through BitTorrent. YIFY releases were characterised through their HD video quality in a small file size, which attracted many downloaders. The original YIFY/YTS website was shut down by the MPAA in 2015; however, numerous websites imitating the YIFY/YTS brand still receive a significant amount of traffic. 'YIFY' is derived from the name of the website's founder, Yiftach Swery.

Previously: Anti-Piracy Copyright Lawyer Decides to Abuse Trademarks to Shut Down Pirates


Original Submission

Related Stories

Anti-Piracy Copyright Lawyer Decides to Abuse Trademarks to Shut Down Pirates 18 comments

Anti-Piracy Copyright Lawyer Decides To Abuse Trademarks To Shut Down Pirates:

Kerry Culpepper, Hawaiian IP attorney, [decided] to register a bunch of trademarks for piracy related terms and [is] then going around and shutting down accounts for "pirate" services on social media sites.

[...] The idea I suppose is to try to claim that 42 Ventures is suddenly and recently using these marks in commerce, the only way it would have a valid trademark. That, however, is bullshit. The terms and actual content creators were already long using those marks, as were the holders of the social media accounts 42 Ventures is busy taking down. In other words, Culpepper appears to be perfectly willing to abuse trademark law in his efforts to enforce copyright law. That isn't exactly a consistent respect for intellectual property now, is it?


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @11:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @11:55AM (#998408)

    I have trademarked the term "anti-piracy lawyer". Game over.

  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @12:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @12:29PM (#998411)

    For years I just assumed it was the work of one very dedicated furvert (possibly sarcasm, maybe).

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @12:34PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @12:34PM (#998412)
    The way I understand trademark law is that trademarks are actually granted only for people who actually practice in some domain, and are valid only there. As far as anyone can tell, the only thing that 42 Ventures actually does is litigation, so unless they sue the law firm of Yates, Turner, and Smith (YTS) or Popcorn Time Attorneys-At-Law, they might not have a case. Nissan Motor Company sued an Israeli guy who owned nissan.com, to try to get the domain, but Nissan actually was the guy's surname (it's the name of a month in the traditional Jewish calendar and is not an uncommon Jewish surname). Since Nissan Motor today still uses nissan-motor.com for their main website today, and going to nissan.com [nissan.com] goes to a site for a computer business owned by the guy they sued, they seem to have failed.
    • (Score: 4, Interesting) by takyon on Sunday May 24 2020, @02:24PM (3 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday May 24 2020, @02:24PM (#998428) Journal

      They have made a half-assed attempt at using the trademarks:

      We also asked how 42 Ventures uses the YTS trademark, but this question remains unanswered as well.

      The legal paperwork doesn’t provide any further detail either. 42 Ventures simply write the following: “Plaintiff distributes licensed content to the public from a plurality of means including, but not limited to, websites.”

      We previously learned that the company owns and operates Popcorntime4u.com through which it licenses and promotes YouTube videos. This site also includes a YTS link at the bottom, which links to the free app generator Appsgeyser. Perhaps that how 42 Ventures ‘uses’ the trademark.

      I don't think the fact that it is primarily a law firm matters.

      The trick they want to pull is:

      Whether any of the defendants will show up in court is uncertain. The complaint lists them as being in Serbia, Russia, India and China, and all face a damages claim of $2 million for willful trademark infringement.

      In addition to the damages, 42 Ventures also requests an injunction to prevent third-party intermediaries from facilitating access to the domains. This also applies to hosting companies, search engines, and domain registrars, which makes it likely that these sites will disappear if the injunction is granted.

      If the defendants are a no-show and the court rubber stamps an injunction, the firm can move to cripple the sites or at least get them blocked by ISPs. Rinse and repeat until someone fights back.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @03:42PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @03:42PM (#998437)

        Popcorn time (tm)

      • (Score: 1) by zion-fueled on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:03PM (1 child)

        by zion-fueled (8646) on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:03PM (#998470)

        So trademark can now be used to stifle speech. Just register the organization name and if they want to reverse the takedown, they'll have to de-anonymize.

        Technically a counter suit could be filed but that would require going to court. The guy's offer of settlement is probably not good if someone actually went there: https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/does--prior-art--apply-to-trademarks--1416846.html [avvo.com]

        • (Score: 4, Interesting) by takyon on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:23PM

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:23PM (#998475) Journal

          De-anonymization could be a part of the strategy. You see things like the DMCA being weaponized to dox people on YouTube, for example. In the case of torrent and streaming site clones, the operators may be in anti-copyright safe havens* and their identities might not matter much. But they could still be blocked overseas, deplatformed, have accounts frozen, etc., and they probably won't appear in a U.S. court to challenge an injunction.

          I think the biggest threat could be to get them off the likes of CloudFlare, and then pay for them to be watch them get DDoS'd.

          *TFA says "The complaint lists them as being in Serbia, Russia, India and China".

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @07:53PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @07:53PM (#998532)

      I guess 42 Vultures trademark was taken?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @10:07PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @10:07PM (#998586)

      Yes, this "intellectual property" lawyer is knowingly registering fraudulent "intellectual property".

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by jasassin on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:03PM (4 children)

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:03PM (#998471) Homepage Journal

    I wish anonymous would take this fucking idiot OUT! Hardcore. I hope this prick gets into an accident that leaves him quadriplegic, in utter agony, and lives to suffer to an old age.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
    • (Score: 4, Interesting) by takyon on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:38PM (3 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday May 24 2020, @05:38PM (#998480) Journal

      He's just an individual. MAFIAA and friends will continue to wage war against "piracy" for decades to become. Their actions don't have to be 100% effective, just enough to degrade the illicit streaming and downloading experience (which includes not only the usual free but paid options [firesticktricks.com]) and push people towards "legitimate" services.

      Theaters have taken a shellacking from coronavirus, and films are appearing on streaming services on day 1, which means they can be copied and shared in high quality on day 1. So MAFIAA is going to fight even harder to prevent convenient illicit services from eating into revenue. They will get all the lawyers they need to engage in harassment and trolling.

      The solution is probably to move towards options that are highly decentralized and render any trademark attack or any notion of protected IP utterly meaningless.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by fustakrakich on Sunday May 24 2020, @06:27PM

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Sunday May 24 2020, @06:27PM (#998502) Journal

        move towards options that are highly decentralized

        Most importantly with the ISP. They are the single point of failure.

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Sunday May 24 2020, @07:07PM (1 child)

        by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Sunday May 24 2020, @07:07PM (#998516) Homepage Journal

        The solution is probably to move towards options that are highly decentralized and render any trademark attack or any notion of protected IP utterly meaningless.

        The only thing I can think of is eMule and that was unusably slow.

        What about a TOR network Pirate Bay clone? I think TPB (or one of its clones) has an onion link. If someone here has a few onion torrent links it would be appreciated!

        In the meantime deleting trackers from a torrent before starting it and using only DHT etc in the torrent clients seems to lessen the DMCA letters to my ISP.

        On an off note, qbittorent is the best torrent software I've used. It's free OSS very similar (almost a clone) of uTorrent. It's faster more lightweight than uTorrent and without ads wasting CPU and bandwidth. The installer .exe can be opened with 7zip and extracted to a directory and ran without installing (i.e. portable).

        Nowadays I always try to extract .exe installers and run the software without installing. It works on a surprising amount of software and doesn't require admin access to install (I'm always using a normal user account in Windows 10 and cringe when software asks for admin privileges).

        --
        jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @09:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2020, @09:33PM (#998568)

    Are you enjoying COVID-19, Boomers? I hope you are, because your political response to the pandemic has completely destroyed the economy. Did we really need a Great Recession in 2008 caused by you, and a Great Lockdown in 2020 caused by you? Are you proud of yourselves for creating an economic depression even worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s? Are you proud of yourselves, Boomers? Your legacy will be economic ruin for all. You don't care as long as you Boomers continue to receive your pensions. You Boomers don't have jobs. You Boomers don't create jobs. You Boomers don't do anything for anyone ever. You Boomers are utterly worthless parasites. You don't care about anybody except yourselves. Everybody except you is forced at gunpoint to wear a facemask while you Boomers sit in your giant mansions laughing and waiting to die when you will be buried with your fortunes so nobody will ever touch your precious money.

    Boomers did COVID-19.

(1)