Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday November 25, @02:19AM   Printer-friendly [Skip to comment(s)]

Chemotherapy may affect muscle cells at lower doses than previously thought: The cancer therapy may also affect the protein building process, not just cause muscles to degrade:

According to the researchers, it was previously known that chemotherapy drugs can affect the mitochondria within cells, which can cause the loss of muscle tissue via a process called oxidative stress.

In their new study, the researchers studied three different chemotherapy drugs in cultured muscle cells at levels too low to trigger oxidative stress. They found that the muscle cells were still affected by the lower levels of drugs -- this time by interfering with the process that builds muscle, called protein synthesis.

Gustavo Nader, associate professor of kinesiology, said that while the findings need to be confirmed in humans, they could have implications for cancer treatment in the future.

"Eventually, it may be that the implementation of cancer treatments should consider that even at low doses that do not cause oxidative stress, some chemotherapy drugs may still promote the loss of muscle tissue," Nader said. "The tumor is already making you weak, it's contributing to the loss of muscle mass, and the chemo drugs are helping the tumor to accomplish that."

Additionally, Nader said the results -- recently published in the American Journal of Physiology -- Cell Physiology -- also have the potential to change how health care professionals think about the ways chemotherapy affects the body.

"For a long time, people thought the problem with chemo and muscle loss was an issue with degrading the proteins that already existed in the muscle," Nader said. "So, a lot of research and treatments in the past had the goal of preventing protein degradation. But our study points to there also being a problem with protein synthesis, or the building of new muscle proteins, as well."

Nader said that in addition to having implications for chemotherapy treatment, the findings could also ultimately change the way health care professionals think about other, pharmaceutical cancer treatments and programs.

Journal Reference:
Bin Guo, Devasier Bennet, Daniel J. Belcher, et al. Chemotherapy agents reduce protein synthesis and ribosomal capacity in myotubes independent of oxidative stress, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00116.2021)


Original Submission

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @03:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @03:57AM (#1199432)

    Please. If you want people to click, it has to be tissues from aborted fetuses.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @04:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @04:18AM (#1199437)

    I'm dying of cancer, relying on chemo, the last-stand hail-mary treatment, you fucking fuck!

  • (Score: 1) by shrewdsheep on Thursday November 25, @08:14AM (1 child)

    by shrewdsheep (5215) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 25, @08:14AM (#1199484)

    The article looks at three difference anticancer agents with supposedly different oxidative potential and compares protein synthesis impairment, which is reduced irrespective of oxidative potential. To make this a surprising finding, you would have to assume that oxidative stress is at the beginning of how anticancer medication works (which it is not). Once you accept that oxidative stress is a downstream effect several steps removed from the causative mechanism (say DNA-intercalation), it would be surprising if protein synthesis would only be influenced by oxidative stress.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @06:53PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @06:53PM (#1199607)

      But ... they need to get published for something. So let's make a big deal out of something trivial so that we can get published.

      Plus now the FDA has ammo to ban drugs after their patents expire so that you can be forced to take newer, patented, more expensive, less researched drugs to make big pharma rich. The newer more expensive drugs aren't as bad for you because they haven't been around for decades yet for us to discover all of the bad things they can do. Eventually they will by the time the patents expire and the cycle will be repeated. This is good for FDA staff with pharma investments and back door dealings.

  • (Score: 1) by mexsudo on Thursday November 25, @01:49PM (1 child)

    by mexsudo (6146) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 25, @01:49PM (#1199529)

    Chemo is very destructive
    there are a myriad of different IV and Oral and Topical chemo medications

    watching a loved one suffer from the effects is overwhelming at times

    chemo or Not... difficult question, very difficult

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @03:54PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 25, @03:54PM (#1199568)

      Yes, it is a personal decision to make.

      I had (years of) aggressive chemo since I had an aggressive cancer, with a poor prognosis but was young, and wanted very much to live. It was a miserable experience and my body probably aged 10-20 years from the poisons. But, I'm still alive and have greatly exceeded any expectations of survival. If I get annoyed that I have neuropathy in my hands and feet, or some of the other persistent issues caused by the chemo, I only have to notice that I am alive to experience these inconveniences, and they are put into perspective, "a small price to pay."

(1)