Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Monday June 27 2022, @02:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the guard-your-sulfur-margaritas dept.

'Microorganism' is a misnomer when it comes to centimetre-long Thiomargarita magnifica:

Lurking on rotting leaves sunken in the mangroves of Guadeloupe in the Caribbean live some extraordinary thread-like creatures. These filament-like organisms, up to a centimetre in length, are the biggest single-cell bacteria yet to be found. Named Thiomargarita magnifica, they live by oxidizing sulfur, and are 50 times bigger than any other known bacteria.

[...] There are other whoppers in the Thiomargarita bacteria family, but the next-largest is only around 750 micrometres in length. Other filament-like bacteria are also found in the mangroves, but these all consist of tens or hundreds of cells. "What is very unique about the T. magnifica is that the entire filament, which is among the longest filaments in the mangrove, is just one cell," says Volland.

[...] Now that T. magnifica has been discovered, Gros expects other teams to go off in search of even larger bacteria — which might be hidden in plain sight, he says. Petra Levin at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, says that the discovery challenges conventional wisdom that bacteria have lower size limits than eukaryotic cells. "There's probably an upper limit on cell size at some point, but I don't think it will be peculiar to bacteria or archaea or eukaryotes."

"We really should not underestimate evolution, because we can't guess where it's going to go," says Levin. "I would not have guessed this thing exists, but now that I see it, I can see the logic in the evolution to this point."

Journal Reference:
Volland, J.-M. et al. Science 376, 1453–1458 (2022). DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.16.480423


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:07AM (10 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:07AM (#1256501)

    Petra Levin at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, says that the discovery challenges conventional wisdom that bacteria have lower size limits than eukaryotic cells. "There's probably an upper limit on cell size at some point, but I don't think it will be peculiar to bacteria or archaea or eukaryotes."

    Limit of eucaryotic cells is, as far as my knowledge goes, a few centimeters. The whole problem cells get is that they need a counter-pressure against the high osmotic pressure within the cells, else they burst open. Eukaryotic cells have some feats that help with that (plants for example employ a cell wall), Bacteria only have a plasma membrane, which is characteristic of their classification.

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:31AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:31AM (#1256505)

      Interesting. Is that perhaps the reason for this (from a different article [lbl.gov])?

      For most bacteria, their DNA floats freely within the cytoplasm of their cells. This newly discovered species of bacteria keeps its DNA more organized. “The big surprise of the project was to realize that these genome copies that are spread throughout the whole cell are actually contained within a structure that has a membrane,” Volland said. “And this is very unexpected for a bacterium.”

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:44AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:44AM (#1256510)

        That's indeed interesting. That "structure that has a membrane", resembles the nucleus in eukaryotic cells. Seems like this organism has a lot of work to give in various biological research fields.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:52AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @11:52AM (#1256511)

        I think the "internal organization" of cells has only limited influence on the cell size limit. I don't think you can conclude that the presence of some nuclear structure-like organelle allows for bigger cells by definition.

    • (Score: 2, Interesting) by shrewdsheep on Monday June 27 2022, @12:49PM (1 child)

      by shrewdsheep (5215) on Monday June 27 2022, @12:49PM (#1256514)

      The human body has cells up to 2 meters long. These are sensory neurons from the toes reaching all way up to the brain. Another type of cells which might get very long are muscle cells. The pregnant uterus can contain cells >10 cms. Life usually finds a way around even seemingly unalterable limits.

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @01:03PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @01:03PM (#1256517)

      https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/brain-metrics/the_measure_of_a_whale/ [nature.com]

      Mammals have a cell called the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). The DRG carries sensory information from the body to the brain. It's unipolar, so it's got a loooong axon, where one end has receptors in the skin and the other end enters the spinal cord, ascends in the fasciculus gracilis and synapses in the nucleus gracilis all the way up in the brainstem.

      This means that for the sensations in the toes, the DRG axon goes all the way from the toe to the brainstem, which is at about the same height as the mouth. This can be more than 2 meters long in tall people!

      For example, the largest blue whales are around 30 m long. This would suggest a DRG axon of at least 25 m, or 75 feet, long.

      blue whale spinal axons growing at 3 cm/day represent an increase in volume that is likely more than double the volume of the entire neuron cell body—each day. This rapid volume increase for neurons is akin to the peak cellular growth rate observed for rapidly dividing cancerous cells.

      Sometimes I think animals aren't that different from single celled creatures and the initial main reason brains developed was to solve the problem of controlling a multicellular body and not really to solve the problem of thinking. Worms aren't that smart. If it really is that easy to have a group of cells become far more intelligent than a single cell then why are groups of humans not that much smarter than the individuals they are composed from?

      • (Score: 0, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @01:40PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @01:40PM (#1256522)

        Sometimes I think animals aren't that different from single celled creatures and the initial main reason brains developed was to solve the problem of controlling a multicellular body and not really to solve the problem of thinking.

        Two things here:
        1) A bacterium and a yeast cell are both single celled, yet they are more different than a human and a cucumber. Let that sink in.
        2) Plants are multicellular, yet don't have a brain, so that can't be the reason a brain developed. The brain does more than only thinking, it also controls signal in- and output, as well as some hormonal regulation. Even then, I think there is more to it.

        Worms aren't that smart. If it really is that easy to have a group of cells become far more intelligent than a single cell then why are groups of humans not that much smarter than the individuals they are composed from?

        The group of cells that compose an organism have given up specific functions and specialized to form the organism. It's a survival strategy to become multicellular, just like hives. As for the reason why a group of people don't become more intelligent when the group expands, there can be multiple reasons (group think, conflicting interests, etc.). Sociology might give answers to that.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 28 2022, @03:59PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 28 2022, @03:59PM (#1256708)
          Plants don't do that much controlling of a multicellular body...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @03:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @03:52PM (#1256534)
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday June 28 2022, @12:43PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday June 28 2022, @12:43PM (#1256688) Journal
      Nerve cells are to my knowledge the most extreme in length (perhaps muscle cells can be comparable). And some of them can be a meter in length just in the human body. I gather that the corresponding nerve cells in whales run most of the length of the animal (blue whales, for example, can be 30 meters in length).
(1)