Two players leverage quantum rules to achieve a seemingly telepathic connection:
A quantum particle can exist in two mutually exclusive conditions at once. For example, a photon can be polarized so that the electric field in it wriggles vertically, horizontally, or both ways at the same time—at least until it's measured. [...] The polarization emerges only with the measurement.
That last bit rankled Albert Einstein, who thought something like a photon's polarization should have a value independent of whether it is measured. He suggested particles might carry "hidden variables" that determine how a two-way state will collapse. However, in 1964, British theorist John Bell found a way to prove experimentally that such hidden variables cannot exist by exploiting a phenomenon known as entanglement.
Two photons can be entangled so that each is in an uncertain both-ways state, but their polarizations are correlated so that if one is horizontal the other must be vertical and vice versa. Probing entanglement is tricky. To do so, Alice and Bob must each have a measuring apparatus. Those devices can be oriented independently, so Alice can test whether her photon is polarized horizontally or vertically, while Bob can cant his detector by an angle. The relative orientation of the detectors affects how much their measurements are correlated.
Bell envisioned Alice and Bob orienting their detectors randomly over many measurements and then comparing the results. If hidden variables determine a photon's polarization, the correlations between Alice's and Bob's measurements can be only so strong. But, he argued, quantum theory allows them to be stronger. Many experiments have seen those stronger correlations and ruled out hidden variables, albeit only statistically over many trials.
[...] Now, Xi-Lin Wang and Hui-Tian Wang, physicists at Nanjing University, and colleagues have made the point more clearly through the Mermin-Peres game. In each round of the game, Alice and Bob share not one, but two pairs of entangled photons on which to make any measurements they like. [...]
If hidden variables predetermine the results of the measurements, Alice and Bob can't win every round [...] and on average, they can win at most eight out of nine rounds.
[...] Generating two pairs of entangled photons simultaneously is impractical, Xi-Lin Wang says. So instead, the experimenters used a single pair of photons that are entangled two ways—through polarization and so-called orbital angular momentum, which determines whether a wavelike photon corkscrews to the right or to the left. The experiment isn't perfect, but Alice and Bob won 93.84% of 1,075,930 rounds, exceeding the 88.89% maximum with hidden variables, the team reports in a study in press at Physical Review Letters.
[...] Xi-Lin Wang says the experiment was meant mainly to show the potential of the team's own favorite technology—photons entangled in both polarization and angular momentum. "We wish to improve the quality of these hyperentangled photons."
arXiv paper: Jia-Min Xu, Yi-Zheng Zhen, Yu-Xiang Yang, et al., Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Pseudotelepathy, arXiv:2206.12042v1 [quant-ph] 24 Jun 2022
(Score: 3, Funny) by SomeGuy on Saturday July 30 2022, @01:01AM (8 children)
So if I close my eyes, all you assholes will all disappear, right?
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @01:21AM (1 child)
The way I understand it, if you cease to exist, your world, from your perspective, ceases to exist along with you.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @01:27AM
Whether or not your essence ( spirit, soul, etc. ) will continue to exist has long been considered by theologians and philosophers, and from what I see, no one has any definitive answer.
Pascal's Dilemma.
(Score: 2) by looorg on Saturday July 30 2022, @01:21AM (2 children)
As far as I am concerned you are just a figment of my imagination.
(Score: 2) by bart9h on Saturday July 30 2022, @06:26AM (1 child)
But you have no imagination.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @10:02AM
He seems to have figments of something.
(Score: 5, Touché) by legont on Saturday July 30 2022, @02:58AM (1 child)
True. However, once you open your eyes, you will get another world full with even worse assholes and it will be consistent all the way back to the Big Bang. You, as well as anybody else, would not remember that the world was different.
What you need to do is to close your eyes and imagine a world without assholes, but I am sure you can't do this for an obvious reason - you are an asshole yourself.
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @06:38PM
This happens every time you close your eyes, even to blink. The Universe is replaced with one with even greater assholes, it's happening right now I can feel it.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Sunday July 31 2022, @12:35AM
If you don't measure how many posts are here, then every post here disappears.
This Post [hobbyfarms.com] has been removed, because it might cause a fence.
How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday July 30 2022, @02:51AM (7 children)
I mean, look, if the answer to "If there's nobody to watch, do bears poop in the woods?" is negative, I'm afraid the bears will all go extinct
(large grin... only serious)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 2) by legont on Saturday July 30 2022, @03:01AM (4 children)
Bears do watch aka measure.
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @03:10AM (2 children)
How watches the watchers, tho?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday July 30 2022, @04:05AM (1 child)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @06:40PM
I like to watch [churchofeuthanasia.org]
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @03:12AM
The bears aren't you.
(Score: 2, Funny) by anubi on Saturday July 30 2022, @09:12AM (1 child)
Maybe the bear didn't poop until the hiker stepped in it?
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @11:36AM
Unpossible, no bear is so full of shit as the wait for Godot to hike would result in. I measured and thus it became reality.
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Frosty Piss on Saturday July 30 2022, @04:01AM
Sounds like mathematicians masturbating.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by crafoo on Saturday July 30 2022, @05:08AM (2 children)
superposition until there is an interaction
nothing to do with measurements, specifically, other than measurements must necessarily interact with the quantum field
nothing to do with "intelligence" looking it's way. all woo bullshit and no real scientist actually talks or thinks like that
stop with the disingenuous language. A theory doesn't "allow" or disallow anything about reality, ever. It either accurately describes reality or it does not.
(Score: 2) by inertnet on Saturday July 30 2022, @10:29AM
Right, also:
Isn't it that quantum particles can exist in a multitude of states and not just two.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2022, @07:10PM
The best description of quantum mechanics I read was ironically on a Christian website [landoverbaptist.net].
(Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Saturday July 30 2022, @06:10AM
Photons that wriggle horizontally and vertically at the same time are photons with diagonal, circular or elliptic polarization, depending on the phase. That's true in quantum mechanics just the same way as in classical electromagnetic waves. Nothing strange here.
The quantum strangeness starts only with entanglement, where you get non-local correlations.
Again, wrong. If two photons are (maximally) entangled (the total correlation from the second part only exists with maximal entanglement), then a single photon is not in a superposition state (“both-way state”) but actually unpolarized (that is, they behave as if they had a completely random polarization).
Actually they only ruled out local hidden variables.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Thexalon on Saturday July 30 2022, @10:46AM (2 children)
To quote Douglas Adams:
If perception by something is required to determine the state of the universe, there are enough somethings out there capable of perceiving things to establish most of reality.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by aliks on Sunday July 31 2022, @09:28AM
Not so fast - its quite hard to talk about quantum mechanics in ordinary English.
When we are talking about measurement and perception, what we mean is that our experiment (or our particle) is interacting (entangling) with the external world. The key question is why this entanglement does not make much difference in our everyday world.
No need for sentient organisms peering at dials.
To err is human, to comment divine
(Score: 2) by Sourcery42 on Tuesday August 02 2022, @04:37PM
I thoroughly enjoy Douglas Adams. It might be time for a re-read. Have an upvote. Cats are fun too, as long as Schrodinger stays out of it.