Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday October 03 2022, @01:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-special-reason,-we-just-thought-that-we-would... dept.

US intelligence researches improved radiation detection:

The research arm of US intelligence has begun investigating methods for spotting low doses of ionizing radiation to better protect American service personnel and provide evidence of nuclear technology use.

The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) announced the start of Targeted Evaluation of Ionizing Radiation Exposure (TEI-REX) on Friday, which will look for non-invasive methods of determining radiation exposure in low doses through samples including hair, skin, sweat, and saliva.

In its technical explanation [PDF] of the program, IARPA said current methods of collecting biodosimetry data, which looks at the effects of radiation on human or animal tissue, have a number of issues: it can require invasive samples, such as blood; multiple collections are often required; there's a time limit for getting an accurate reading; the markers used to calculate doses are transient; and there's a wide standard deviation of dose calculations for low-dose exposure.

[...] Other uses include better radiation exposure measurements for military personnel, who often aren't carrying dosimetry badges; detecting and tracking down radiation sources and nuclear contamination out in the field; and testing in remote locations – such as space – where astronauts are exposed to much more radioactivity than those of us on Earth.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by MIRV888 on Monday October 03 2022, @05:51PM (1 child)

    by MIRV888 (11376) on Monday October 03 2022, @05:51PM (#1274744)

    So issuing dosimeter badges would be way too inexpensive.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by JoeMerchant on Monday October 03 2022, @07:10PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday October 03 2022, @07:10PM (#1274747)

      Dosimetry badges can be misused, gamed, and otherwise corrupt the input data.

      What they're looking for here is more incontrovertible proof type info: Strontium 90 found in the hair clippings of 50% of the 151st Airborne correlating with their deployment in Fuckupistan, and the like.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by ElizabethGreene on Monday October 03 2022, @10:04PM

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 03 2022, @10:04PM (#1274776) Journal

    They should ask major cell phone manufacturers to include a sensor and hoover that up with the other surveillance data.

  • (Score: 2) by jb on Wednesday October 05 2022, @03:17AM

    by jb (338) on Wednesday October 05 2022, @03:17AM (#1274969)

    Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

(1)