Open-source tool from MIT's Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply.
Air pollution is a major public health problem: The World Health Organization has estimated that it leads to over 4 million premature deaths worldwide annually. Still, it is not always extensively measured. But now an MIT research team is rolling out an open-source version of a low-cost, mobile pollution detector that could enable people to track air quality more widely.
The detector, called Flatburn, can be made by 3D printing or by ordering inexpensive parts. The researchers have now tested and calibrated it in relation to existing state-of-the-art machines, and are publicly releasing all the information about it - how to build it, use it, and interpret the data.
The Flatburn concept at Senseable City Lab dates back to about 2017, when MIT researchers began prototyping a mobile pollution detector, originally to be deployed on garbage trucks in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The detectors are battery-powered and rechargable, either from power sources or a solar panel, with data stored on a card in the device that can be accessed remotely.
In both cases, the detectors were set up to measure concentrations of fine particulate matter as well as nitrogen dioxide, over an area of about 10 meters. Fine particular matter refers to tiny particles often associated with burning matter, from power plants, internal combustion engines in autos and fires, and more.
"The goal is for community groups or individual citizens anywhere to be able to measure local air pollution, identify its sources, and, ideally, create feedback loops with officials and stakeholders to create cleaner conditions," says Carlo Ratti, director of MIT's Senseable City Lab.
Journal Reference:
An Wang, Yuki Machida, Priyanka deSouza, Simone Mora, Tiffany Duhl, Neelakshi Hudda, John L. Durant, Fábio Duarte, Carlo Ratti, Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings [open], Atmospheric Environment, Volume 301, 2023, 119692, ISSN 1352-2310, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119692
(Score: 2) by Zinho on Tuesday March 21, @03:25PM (1 child)
No links to the project files? Seems like a missed opportunity for getting new volunteers on board. Not what I expected from an MIT publication.
I'll just leave these here:
https://senseable.mit.edu/flatburn/ [mit.edu]
https://github.com/MIT-Senseable-City-Lab/OSCS [github.com]
"Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
(Score: 2) by mhajicek on Tuesday March 21, @04:11PM
Sounds to me like the detector is an electronic device, with a printable case.
The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday March 21, @05:20PM (2 children)
The Flint story incidentally illustrates the problem of overregulation. They gave Flint a free ride because it was in deep financial trouble and PH treatment was expensive. This turned out a huge mistake. My take is that we'll see repeats of the above when these water systems have to deal with regulations that supposedly limit PFAS chemicals (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) to barely detectable levels (few parts per trillion). I bet things like lead will often slide through with the exemptions that will need to be made to keep these systems running.
(Score: 4, Touché) by Thexalon on Tuesday March 21, @05:42PM (1 child)
This is an air-quality device rather than water, and I'd think a good place to ship them right now would be East Palestine, OH.
Your understanding of the Flint story misses one giant point, though: The citizens of Flint weren't given "a free ride" in any sense of the word, because the city government was being run not by a democratically elected municipal government, but by a state-appointed emergency manager [reuters.com] who answered to the governor, not to anybody in Flint. It was the state-appointed people who made the decision to go with a high-lead water source for Flint, overriding all of the local people. A lack of local control, something most conservative and libertarian types advocate for, was a key factor in that whole thing.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday March 21, @08:41PM
Even if it were, the citizens of Flint would not be the government of Flint. And the governor is an elected position.
I'll note that individual freedom is a strong local control and was exercised in this story.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by istartedi on Tuesday March 21, @09:31PM
Can it measure mold and asbestos? The latter is particularly difficult. State of the art asbestos measurements call for passing a calibrated quantity of air through a capture device, and then examining it under an electron microscope. Even if you still had to send the device off to a lab, coming up with something cheap you could just leave in the office for a few hours would be a game changer. The existing devices are electric pumps which are rather conspicuous and noisy, or personal monitors which also have pumps and I'm guessing they're not quite as accurate. Mold is probably easier to detect, but at any rate it'd be nice to have something for home or the office. At work you really are "just trusting" that the employer is compliant. They're not going to like this. They'll probably try to make you sign away your rights in this regard, but if they can put a camera in the breakroom, we should be able to put an air quality monitor on our desks.
Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.