Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday April 13, @04:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the oooh-that-stings dept.

What once appeared as a fossil of the primitive animal Dickinsonia turned out to be nothing more than a decaying beehive:

In 2020, amid the first pandemic lockdowns, a scientific conference scheduled to take place in India never happened.

But a group of geologists who were already on site decided to make the most of their time and visited the Bhimbetka Rock Shelters, a series of caves with ancient cave art near Bhopal, India. There, they spotted the fossil of Dickinsonia, a flat, elongated and primitive animal from before complex animals evolved. It marked the first-ever discovery of Dickinsonia in India.

The animal lived 550 million years ago, and the find seemed to settle once and for all the surprisingly controversial age of the rocks making up much of the Indian subcontinent. The find attracted the attention of The New York Times, The Weather Channel and the scientific journal Nature as well as many Indian newspapers.

Only, it turns out, the "fossil" was a case of mistaken identity. The true culprit? Bees.

University of Florida researchers traveled to the site last year and discovered the object had seemingly decayed significantly – quite unusual for a fossil. What's more, giant bee's nests populate the site, and the mark spotted by the scientists in 2020 closely resembled the remains of these large hives.

[...] Gregory Retallack, professor emeritus at the University of Oregon and lead author of the original paper, says he and his co-authors agree with Meert's findings that the object is really just a beehive. They are submitting a comment in support of the new paper to the journal.

This kind of self-correction is a bedrock principle of the scientific method. But the reality is that admitting errors is hard for scientists to do, and it doesn't happen often.

[...] Correcting the fossil record puts the age of the rocks back into contention. Because the rock formation doesn't have any fossils from a known time period, dating it can be difficult.

Journal Reference:
Joseph Meert et al., Stinging News: 'Dickinsonia' discovered in the Upper Vindhyan of India not worth the buzz, Gondwana Research, 117, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.003


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @03:09AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @03:09AM (#1301371)
    The Indians initially couldn't even tell the difference between a beehive and a fossil, or they intentionally didn't?
    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @03:32AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @03:32AM (#1301375)

      India and science do not mix. Corrupt, class-ridden, bureaucratic and morally flexible - and the Indians are even worse ;)

    • (Score: 2) by driverless on Saturday April 15, @05:50AM

      by driverless (4770) on Saturday April 15, @05:50AM (#1301531)

      Some aspects of science are highly politicised in India, in particular there's a bunch of sloppy science through to outright pseudoscience intended to support BJP ideology, for example one of the things they like doing via "science" is manipulating the historical record ("India invented electron microscopes in 3,000BC!"). The equivalent in the US is "science" designed to support corporate agendas, in India it's political ones. With the evidence currently available it's not possible to tell whether it was an honest mistake or science serving the ends of the BJP.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @12:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, @12:16PM (#1301409)

    Makes one wonder about fossil evidence in general.

(1)