Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Monday April 17, @10:26PM   Printer-friendly

Chipzilla reportedly wants more cash. Germany wants a bigger facility. And the EU is lurking with a bigger offer:

If Intel wants larger subsidies for its Magdeburg mega-fab, German officials think the x86 giant should increase its investments to match.

Citing people familiar with the matter, the Financial Times reported on Thursday that the German government is willing to consider boosting subsidies, but only if Intel is willing to spend more on infrastructure too.

"It's logical that if the scale of the investment is increased, then the level of subsidy would also rise," Sven Schultze, the economy minister for Saxony-Anhalt, told the FT.

The debate over the size of Chipzilla's assets comes after multiple reports that Intel had pressured the German government for larger subsidies to offset rising energy and material costs, and hinted at delaying the project. Intel now expects the facility to cost somewhere in the neighborhood €20 billion ($22.1 billion) to complete.

Rising costs have also impacted the cost of Intel's two Arizona plants, which are now expected to cost 50 percent more than when first announced.

To date, the German government has committed €6.8 billion ($7.5 billion) to the Intel's planned builds — about 40 percent of the project's original €17 billion ($19 billion) price tag. However, last month, Bloomberg reported that Intel pushed for an additional €4-5 billion in subsidies.

[...] However, Intel's position could soon improve. The European Commission is expected to sign its own CHIPs funding bill into law any day now. The bill would unlock roughly €43 billion ($48 billion) to attract semiconductor investment in the region.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 1) by shrewdsheep on Tuesday April 18, @12:35PM

    by shrewdsheep (5215) on Tuesday April 18, @12:35PM (#1301931)

    My understanding is that such contract contain provisions for cost increases/unforeseen events. Then, IANAL/MBA, so maybe someone can explain this game?

(1)