Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday April 28 2023, @11:09AM   Printer-friendly

UK government blocks Microsoft's proposed Activision purchase

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/04/uk-government-blocks-microsofts-proposed-activision-purchase/

In its long-awaited final report, the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority said that Microsoft's proposed $69 billion acquisition of Activision would "result in a substantial lessening of competition" (SLC) in the supply of cloud-gaming services in the UK. As such, the regulator said that "the only effective remedy to this SLC and its adverse consequences is to prohibit the Merger."

The final report cites Microsoft's "strong position" in the cloud-gaming sector, where the company has an estimated 60 to 70 percent market share that makes it "already much stronger than its rivals." After purchasing Activision, the CMA says Microsoft "would find it commercially beneficial to make Activision's titles exclusive to its own cloud gaming service."

Microsoft has in recent months signed deals with Nvidia and smaller cloud-gaming providers in an attempt to "mak[e] even more clear to regulators that our acquisition of Activision Blizzard will make Call of Duty available on far more devices than before," as Microsoft Vice Chair and President Brad Smith said in a statement last month. But the CMA said these kinds of cloud-gaming deals—which Microsoft submitted to the CMA as a proposed remedy for any anticompetitive effects of the merger—were "limited to cloud gaming providers with specific business models" and thus not sufficient to address the regulator's concerns.

Previously:
Microsoft and Activision Will Miss Their Contractual Merger Deadline 20230115
FTC Moves to Block Microsoft's Activision Acquisition 20221209
The Biggest Deal in Gaming is Under Fire From U.S. Senators 20220403
Microsoft Set to Purchase Activision Blizzard in $68.7 Billion Deal 20220118

Related:
Microsoft's Latest Tactics Show that Gabe Newell of Valve was Right to Worry 20160306

Furious Microsoft Boss Says Confidence in UK 'Severely Shaken'

Furious Microsoft boss says confidence in UK 'severely shaken':

Microsoft's president has attacked the UK after it was blocked from buying US gaming firm Activision, saying the EU was a better place to start a business.

The move was "bad for Britain" and marked Microsoft's "darkest day" in its four decades of working in the country, Brad Smith told the BBC.

The regulator hit back saying it had to do what's best for people, "not merging firms with commercial interests".

The UK's move means the multi-billion dollar deal cannot go ahead globally.

Although US and EU regulators have yet to decide on whether to approve the deal, the UK regulator the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said: "Activision is intertwined through different markets - it can't be separated for the UK. So this decision blocks the deal from happening globally."

If it had been approved, the $68.7bn (£55bn) deal would have been the gaming industry's biggest ever takeover, and would have seen Microsoft get hold of massively popular games titles such as Call of Duty, Candy Crush and World of Warcraft.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

Related Stories

Microsoft's Latest Tactics Show that Gabe Newell of Valve was Right to Worry 64 comments

GamingOnLinux reports

Gabe Newell from Valve was quite right to fear about the future when he starting talking up Linux, and now it looks like Microsoft will be trying to push their own store even more.

Microsoft are moving to combine Windows 10 and Xbox One into one platform, and with that the Windows Store will become a bigger thing for them. This is something Gabe Newell of Valve feared, and it looks like it really is starting to become true. While there's nothing wrong with having universal games that work on W10 and XBone, making sure developers have to stick to their store is a problem.

The problem here, is that Microsoft are using their money and their exclusivity deals to keep certain games only on the Windows Store which locks out Steam in the process. There may not be too many doing it yet, but you can be sure over time Microsoft will sign more of these Windows 10 exclusive deals like they have with Quantum Break. Ars [Technica] actually put it quite well in their article here:

Unfortunately for Spencer, not only has the PC as gaming platform seen little improvement from Microsoft--bar DirectX 12--but the company's one-platform-fits-all approach simply isn't going to fly on PC. The PC community has its own rules and expectations. Forcing console-like restrictions on a group that values freedom was never going to end well. And now, with those people backed into a corner with Quantum Break--one of this year's most highly anticipated games--the backlash is only going to get bigger.

On this same theme (different kingpin), El Reg reports:

[Continues.]

Microsoft Set to Purchase Activision Blizzard in $68.7 Billion Deal 27 comments

Microsoft Set to Purchase Activision Blizzard in $68.7 Billion Deal

Microsoft set to purchase Activision Blizzard in $68.7 billion deal:

Microsoft this morning announced plans to purchase gaming mega-publisher Activision Blizzard for a record-setting $68.7 billion. The move, when finalized, would bring franchises like Call of Duty, Overwatch, Diablo, World of Warcraft, Starcraft, and many more under the umbrella of the Xbox maker.

Today's announcement follows on Microsoft's $7.8 billion acquisition of Bethesda, announced just 15 months ago. After some initial confusion about what that meant for Bethesda's multiplatform titles, it has since become clear that most of Bethesda's biggest franchises, such as Elder Scrolls, will not be appearing on competing consoles such as the PlayStation 5.

In an encouraging sign for fans of Activision Blizzard's multiplatform games, Microsoft said in its announcement that "Activision Blizzard games are enjoyed on a variety of platforms and we plan to continue to support those communities moving forward." But Microsoft and Bethesda executives made similar positive noises about multiplatform titles before the deal was closed, only to shift towards Bethesda exclusivity after the deal was finalized.

Microsoft notes in its announcement that Activision Blizzard games would become a part of its Game Pass program, which currently enjoys 25 million subscribers. "With Activision Blizzard's nearly 400 million monthly active players in 190 countries and three billion-dollar franchises, this acquisition will make Game Pass one of the most compelling and diverse lineups of gaming content in the industry," the company said. "Upon close, Microsoft will have 30 internal game development studios, along with additional publishing and esports production capabilities."

The Biggest Deal in Gaming is Under Fire From U.S. Senators 22 comments

The Biggest Deal In Gaming Is Under Fire From U.S. Senators:

Four U.S. senators have torpedoed Microsoft's $69 billion deal for Activision. They believe that the consolidation of the high-tech industry and corporate culture of gender misconduct at Activision could expand by the transaction. Democrat senators think that the planned takeover could undermine employees' calls for accountability over alleged gender and sexual harassment at the game developer.

Senators Elizabeth Warren (D), Bernie Sanders (I), Cory Booker (D), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D) are distraught with the fact that Robert Kotick, chief exec of Activision, will remain at the helm of the game company until closing in 2023. With the same head, the culture of misconduct will not go away, they assume. Another point they are concerned about is the consolidation of the high-tech industry in general and its impact on the workforce. Given their concerns, they wrote a letter to the Federal Trade Commission in an attempt to block the deal.

"We are deeply concerned about consolidation in the tech industry and its impact on workers," the letter obtained by the Wall Street Journal reads. "This lack of accountability, despite shareholders, employees, and the public calling for Kotick to be held responsible for the culture he created, would be an unacceptable result of the proposed Microsoft acquisition."

[...] The senators demand that FTC oppose the deal if it finds that it can worsen the negotiating position between workers and companies (in this case, Microsoft represents both entities).

Previously:
Microsoft Set to Purchase Activision Blizzard in $68.7 Billion Deal


Original Submission

FTC Moves to Block Microsoft's Activision Acquisition 4 comments

The Federal Trade Commission has announced that it intends to sue to block Microsoft from acquiring Activision. Regulators are making the argument that Microsoft is doing this to use its control of game catalogs to make more and more games exclusive to the XBox in an effort to gain market share from its competitors, which is a violation of anti-trust law.

In a complaint issued today, the FTC pointed to Microsoft's record of acquiring and using valuable gaming content to suppress competition from rival consoles, including its acquisition of ZeniMax, parent company of Bethesda Softworks (a well-known game developer). Microsoft decided to make several of Bethesda's titles including Starfield and Redfall Microsoft exclusives despite assurances it had given to European antitrust authorities that it had no incentive to withhold games from rival consoles.

"Microsoft has already shown that it can and will withhold content from its gaming rivals," said Holly Vedova, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. "Today we seek to stop Microsoft from gaining control over a leading independent game studio and using it to harm competition in multiple dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets."

Microsoft's Xbox Series S and Series X are one of only two types of high performance video game consoles. Importantly, Microsoft also offers a leading video game content subscription service called Xbox Game Pass, as well as a cutting-edge cloud-based video game streaming service, according to the complaint.

Microsoft and Activision Will Miss Their Contractual Merger Deadline 2 comments

The FTC has scheduled a hearing for August 2, well after the deal is supposed to close:

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has thrown a monkey wrench into Microsoft's plan to acquire Activision. According to a scheduling order filed last week, the FTC's antitrust lawsuit hearing against the deal will not begin until August 2. This date is well past the contracted deadline of July 18, 2023, effectively triggering a breach in the agreement.

Technically, a failed closure would require Microsoft to pay Activision a $3 billion "breakup fee." However, since something outside of Microsoft's and Activision's control is causing the delay, it's more likely the two will have to start over and cut a new deal. What that means is as yet unclear.

The original agreement was to pay Activision $95 per share, a 40-percent premium over its then $65 market price. Since then, Activision's stock has traded in the mid-to-high 70s. It is currently priced at $76.90, theoretically putting Activision in a better bargaining position for a redeal.

However, Activision's public stance has been that it wants the merger just as much as Microsoft does. So it's within the realm of possibility that the two shake hands and say, "Same deal."

Microsoft and Activision agreed to the merger nearly a year ago. At the time, both companies expected to have the acquisition closed as early as November 2022. However, the record-breaking $68.7 billion buyout immediately got the attention of multiple regulators in several countries, including the FTC.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Thexalon on Friday April 28 2023, @11:19AM (2 children)

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday April 28 2023, @11:19AM (#1303605)

    I mean, it's not like Microsoft has ever done anything anti-competitive before, like, say, leveraging an operating system monopoly to eliminate an application that ran on it that they didn't like. And in this case, I'm sure they haven't even dreamed of using control of the game catalog to try to force people to buy X-Boxes rather than Playstations.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 5, Funny) by Gaaark on Friday April 28 2023, @11:28AM

      by Gaaark (41) on Friday April 28 2023, @11:28AM (#1303607) Journal

      Yeah: you reap what you sow, Microsoft.

      From the MOTD: "Jesus may love you, but I think you're garbage wrapped in skin." -- Michael O'Donohugh

      This ^ is Microsoft.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    • (Score: 2) by canopic jug on Friday April 28 2023, @01:23PM

      by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 28 2023, @01:23PM (#1303621) Journal

      Why quote only the m$ owned and controlled press and pseudo press?

      I prefer Cory Doctorow's take on it, that the UK has prevented a convicted monopolist from re-offending [pluralistic.net]. Really everyone should be breathing a sigh of relief at this decision, especially gamers.

      M$ acquired the DOS monopoly from IBM via Bill's mother and has only ever had one trick in its bag: abusing and extending the existing monopolies into new markets. Right now the primary means they have are the OEM monopoly and the productivity software format monopoly. With the arrival of Android, though, the OEM monopoly is starting to matter very little forcing to branch out more into selling 'bug doors' to various agencies around the world. That may have been tolerable to some, but not all, while things were cooler but now that war is spreading, especially hybrid war, any presence of m$ products in mission-critical services is truly unacceptable.

      --
      Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Friday April 28 2023, @11:31AM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Friday April 28 2023, @11:31AM (#1303609)

    > The move was "bad for Britain" and marked Microsoft's "darkest day" in its four decades of working in the country

    Laugh Out Loud.

    I propose to take it further and get rid of windows in gov.uk...

  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Friday April 28 2023, @11:39AM (2 children)

    by VLM (445) on Friday April 28 2023, @11:39AM (#1303610)

    had to do what's best for people

    I'm struggling to think of any theoretical possible positives if the deal had gone thru.

    They could, um...

    Note that I'm not against capitalism or mergers or whatever in a general sense. But in this individual sense I'm not sure what anyone would gain.

    Can't MS find anything better to do with their vast piles of money? Go buy Ford and compete against Tesla, or buy govt bonds or something?

    It just seems kind of knee jerk on the part of MS. So we got a vast pile of money and no idea what to profitably do with it. I guess buy a giant competitor? Like really? Give the money back to the stockholders in the form of dividends or diversify into a wider new industry or ... anything other than "more of what we already do"?

    • (Score: 2) by canopic jug on Friday April 28 2023, @01:28PM (1 child)

      by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 28 2023, @01:28PM (#1303622) Journal

      Can't MS find anything better to do with their vast piles of money?

      What vast piles of money do you refer to? Their annual reported "profit" is far less than the lump sum they have received via government handouts say for for JEDI and other fraud. Keep in mind that just this year alone, they've laid off many tens of thousands of employees. Even the marketing gimmick, ChatGPT, is just chaff to distract from firings in the Azure division and the fact that much of Azure goes unused. In fact, if there was any demand at all for Azure, there would be no cycles left over to run their chaffbot.

      --
      Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
      • (Score: 2) by VLM on Friday April 28 2023, @08:13PM

        by VLM (445) on Friday April 28 2023, @08:13PM (#1303750)

        What vast piles of money do you refer to

        Well their merger-ability in general. It just seems squandered on buying "yet another software company" Why not diversify into logistics or building mars rockets or anything else?

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Gaaark on Friday April 28 2023, @12:20PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) on Friday April 28 2023, @12:20PM (#1303616) Journal

    The U.K. Competition people see what American Competition people have been paid to look away from.

    Microsoft is arse.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 29 2023, @10:36AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 29 2023, @10:36AM (#1303875)

      No,
      The UK competition people have seen the size of the brown envelopes the US competition people got, and want parity...

      The bulging brown envelope magic pass, is an accepted (but not condoned) fact in the UK way of doing business at certain levels...just ask anyone over here about planning departments - they're the most notorious UK example of local governmental lovers of the things - it's amazing how 'suddenly' business planning applications which have been knocked back several times are approved after a 'special' meeting of the planning committee.

      Mind you, as Microsoft have a far too cozy and long established relationship with UKGov, this might just all be a bit of arranged easy theatre '...look, see, our regulamatatorz does haz teethz'n'clawz'n'fingz...'

      If so, then I fully expect this decision to be overturned after 'assurances are given about any concerns raised' (or some other such BS) plus a few extra UKGov contracts for MS cloud shitwankery as reward for providing UKGov with yet another badly needed bit of deadcatting theatre to show that they're competently in charge...aye, right...

      .

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 28 2023, @12:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 28 2023, @12:54PM (#1303619)

    It's not like it's critical to the survival or health of society. There are times when it is appropriate for the Government to step in, but this isn't one of them.

  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by EJ on Friday April 28 2023, @01:41PM

    by EJ (2452) on Friday April 28 2023, @01:41PM (#1303625)

    I don't care what the ultimate outcome of all this is as long as it's the worst possible thing for Bobby. I hate that man with a passion.

  • (Score: 2) by bradley13 on Friday April 28 2023, @08:58PM

    by bradley13 (3053) on Friday April 28 2023, @08:58PM (#1303766) Homepage Journal

    Yes. This happens, a lot. Students will downloaded ad something, and not know where it is. They will create a document, and have no idea if it is on their computer or "in the cloud". They don't even understand the difference.

    It's not only bizarre. It's frightening. They not only don't know where their data is, they don't care.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
(1)