A sneak peek at Earth's eventual fate:
Roughly 5 billion years from now, our Sun will end, not with a bang but with a whimper. That's when it finally burns through all the fuel in its core and puffs outward into a red giant, swallowing all the inner planets of our Solar System in the process, including Earth. But no star has ever been caught in the act of gulping down a planet this way—until now. Astronomers have spotted a white-hot flash from a distant star in our Milky Way galaxy and concluded that it came from the final stage of this process, according to a new paper published in the journal Nature. Yes, it's a literal "Death Star," announced on the eve of Star Wars Day (May 4).
[...] This process only occurs a few times a year in the Milky Way. Astronomers have observed the early stages of the process (planets so close to their host stars that they will inevitably be engulfed when those stars expand) along with the aftermath of this stellar evolution (when the stars have puffed up and seem to have peculiar properties, such as their rotational speed or chemical composition). But scientists have never witnessed the actual devouring. That's what makes this discovery so exciting, according to co-author Kishalay De, an MIT postdoc: This is the first direct evidence of a crucial stage of stellar evolution.
[...] De was poring over data from the Zwicky Transit Facility (ZTF) at the Palomar Observatory in California about three years ago, hunting for the telltale brightening (by a factor of a few thousand times over the course of a week) that marks a nova. Such explosions occur when a white dwarf steals matter from a companion star. De spotted a star brightening by a factor of a few hundred times over the course of a couple of weeks. He quickly checked out observations of the same star taken by the Keck Observatory in Hawaii. But the spectrum revealed that the composition and temperature of the gas surrounding this star was nothing like a nova. "This source appeared to be surrounded by a bunch of cold gas," De said. "We were seeing signs of molecules that can only exist at cold temperatures."
The best way to get a better look at the cold gas was to view the system in the infrared spectrum, so De turned to observational data from the Palomar Observatory's infrared camera, as well as archival data collected by NASA's NEOWISE telescope, which images the night sky in the infrared every six months. That data showed that even after the optical light had faded, there was still a strong infrared glow from all that cold dust. Nine months before the brightening, NEOWISE had picked up an infrared glow from dust in the system. And data from the Gemini South Telescope provided high-resolution observations enabling De et al. to pinpoint the location of the outburst, as well as measurements of the star's brightness over time, free of contaminating data from nearby stars.
All that data gave De three key pieces of evidence: cold gas detected in the outburst, dust formed after the outburst giving off an infrared glow, and an infrared brightening several months before the outburst. De thought it must be the signature of two stars merging, but the event was 100 to 1,000 times fainter than any such merger known. So whatever ZTF SLRN-2020 swallowed had to be something a thousand times less massive than the star, based on what is currently known about stellar dynamics. The most likely object was a planet: a gas giant roughly the size of Jupiter.
[...] "One of the reasons we do astronomy in the first place is to answer the questions: Where do we come from? And where are we going," said De. "This particular discovery shows us where we are going. It's a testament to our eventual state in the Universe. All that we see around us, all that we've built, will be gone in a flash when the Sun decides to evolve and puff out in 5 billion years."
(Score: 3, Informative) by DadaDoofy on Monday May 08, @10:33AM (3 children)
According to the article, they did not see it. They saw a flash of light and then "concluded" that must have been what happened. Not really the same.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Kymation on Monday May 08, @05:46PM
It's a hypothesis -- the best explanation we have that fits all of the data. This is the way science works.
True, the headline is overstated. Aren't they always?
(Score: 3, Funny) by hendrikboom on Monday May 08, @07:28PM (1 child)
How else do we see anything except by light?
(Score: 3, Funny) by DadaDoofy on Monday May 08, @11:58PM
Well, yeah. I flicked the light on and off in my bedroom last light and I concluded it was a supernova. Because light.