Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday June 10, @07:26PM   Printer-friendly

US Patent Office Proposes Rule To Make it Much Harder To Kill Bad Patents:

So, this is bad. Over the last few years, we've written plenty about the so-called "inter partes review" or "IPR" that came into being about a decade ago as part of the "America Invents Act," which was the first major change to the patent system in decades. For much of the first decade of the 2000s, patent trolls were running wild and creating a massive tax on innovation. There were so many stories of people (mostly lawyers) getting vague and broad patents that they never had any intention of commercializing, then waiting for someone to come along and build something actually useful and innovative... and then shaking them down with the threat of patent litigation.

The IPR process, while not perfect, was at least an important tool in pushing back on some of the worst of the worst patents. In its most basic form, the IPR process allows nearly anyone to challenge a bad patent and have the special Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) review the patent to determine if it should have been granted in the first place. Given that a bad patent can completely stifle innovation for decades this seems like the very least that the Patent Office should offer to try to get rid of innovation-killing bad patents.

However, patent trolls absolutely loathe the IPR process for fairly obvious reasons. It kills their terrible patents. The entire IPR process has been challenged over and over again and (thankfully) the Supreme Court said that it's perfectly fine for the Patent Office to review granted patents to see if they made a mistake.

But, of course, that never stops the patent trolls. They've complained to Congress. And, now, it seems that the Patent Office itself is trying to help them out. Recently, the USPTO announced a possible change to the IPR process that would basically lead to limiting who can actually challenge bad patents, and which patents could be challenged.

The folks over at EFF are rightly raising the alarm about just how bad this could be if it goes into effect.

The U.S. Patent Office has proposed new rules about who can challenge wrongly granted patents. If the rules become official, they will offer new protections to patent trolls. Challenging patents will become far more onerous, and impossible for some. The new rules could stop organizations like EFF, which used this process to fight the Personal Audio "podcasting patent," from filing patent challenges altogether.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by looorg on Sunday June 11, @12:36PM (1 child)

    by looorg (578) on Sunday June 11, @12:36PM (#1310973)

    This makes no sense. Why would you make it harder to correct mistakes? Unless you are a scum lawyer that apparently make a living of mistakes. Where they want a defective system to abuse and they like to keep it like that. But for the rest of us and for the system to work it makes no sense. So good for them, bad for everyone else. Or have the current system generated so much extra work with various appeals? But then the scum lawyers should like that since they can bill per hour.

    They want a system where it's easy to get patents, and then hard to remove or correct errors. I think I would prefer a system where it's hard and takes a long time to get a patent but it's easy to correct mistakes in the investigation or application process later. I guess I won't become a patent-troll lawyer any time soon.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aafcac on Sunday June 11, @02:45PM

      by aafcac (17646) on Sunday June 11, @02:45PM (#1310992)

      Yes, I wouldn't expect this to get traction as this is mostly something that a handful of attorneys were using to rip off corporations.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by jelizondo on Sunday June 11, @05:01PM

    by jelizondo (653) on Sunday June 11, @05:01PM (#1311009) Journal

    How do you know your government has been captured by moneyed people?

    When it doesn't matter if it's D or R, they rule for the people with money.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by rpnx on Monday June 12, @10:29PM (1 child)

    by rpnx (13892) on Monday June 12, @10:29PM (#1311178) Journal

    We should just eliminate patents entirely with immediate effect.

    Would solve all issues.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by rpnx on Wednesday June 14, @04:01AM

      by rpnx (13892) on Wednesday June 14, @04:01AM (#1311357) Journal

      Call it funny but I'm dead serious.

      The more I read about patents the less I am convinced the benefits outweigh the harms. We should try 20 years with no patents and see what happens.

(1)