from the "important"-means-just-what-I-choose-it-to-mean—neither-more-nor-less dept.
Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
The European Union and China have launched an initiative aimed at addressing issues faced by European companies in the Middle Kingdom related to the transfer of non-personal data.
The effort goes by the very sexy name "Cross-Border Data Flow Communication Mechanism."
The goal is to address concerns about China's restrictive data export laws, which have left European businesses unsure about what they’re allowed to do with data collected in China – particularly in sectors like finance, pharma, automotive, and ICT.
The European Commission has specific concerns around vague language regarding China's requirements to obtain security approvals for exports of all "important data." Beijing has not offered a solid definition of that term – leaving Europeans concerned it could be applied broadly.
The initiative is intended to "focus on practical solutions."
[...] Beijing has long sought to control how its domestic businesses store their data. It is known to take action – including pulling apps and blocking IPOs – against those on its naughty list.
[...] The European Commission stated on Monday that the cross-border data transfer restrictions are "a major contributing factor to the declining confidence of European investors in China."
It likely isn't wrong. Many Western businesses have already left the nation. Yahoo! ditched its Chinese operations when the nation's Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), which regulates data storage, came into effect in 2021.
[...] While China is careful not to let customer data about its citizens leave its shores, it has a reputation for being happy to slurp up the data of other countries' people.
For instance, TikTok admitted back in 2022 that some data about US-based users is transferred back to the Middle Kingdom.
Other countries have started to take notice. Earlier this month, Kakao Pay – a subsidiary of Korea's WhatsApp analog Kakao – got in trouble with regulators for sharing the data of more than 40 million users with a subsidiary of Alipay, a company under the umbrella of Chinese-owned Alibaba.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Monday September 02, @06:47PM (1 child)
In China, any data that can be leveraged by the government to the government's advantage is "important data". That isn't so very different from the US intel communities and Department of Defense. All it takes is some stuffed suit to decide that a bit of data is important to "national security", and you become a traitor for sharing that bit of data with a non-citizen. I heard that Joe Biden likes ice cream, but I wouldn't share that with any non-citizens, for fear that a random terrorist might entice Joe to share more important secrets.
A MAN Just Won a Gold Medal for Punching a Woman in the Face
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 02, @07:37PM
Or that POTUS likes RayBan Aviator Sunglasses ...
(Score: 2) by Username on Tuesday September 03, @04:42PM
Is this the same EU that fined Uber for hosting employee info on US servers?