Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Saturday October 05, @04:13PM   Printer-friendly

California enacts car data privacy law to curb domestic violence:

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a bill that requires automakers selling internet-connected cars to do more to protect domestic abuse survivors, a move that may expand such safeguards nationwide.

As automakers add ever more sophisticated technology to their cars, instances of stalking and harassment using features such as location tracking and remote controls have begun to emerge.

The bill passed the California state legislature with overwhelming support, and Newsom signed it on Friday along with several other measures intended to protect domestic violence survivors. The law could lead to the new standards being implemented beyond California, as automakers tend to avoid producing different cars for different states.

Legislative analysts cited reporting from Reuters and the New York Times about carmakers which did not help women who alleged they were being targeted by their partners. One woman unsuccessfully sued Tesla, alleging the company failed to act after she repeatedly complained that her husband was stalking and harassing her with the automaker's technology despite a restraining order.

Among its provisions, the California bill requires automakers to set up a clear process for drivers to submit a copy of a restraining order or other documentation and request termination of another driver's remote access within two business days. It also mandates that carmakers enable drivers to easily turn off location access from inside the vehicle.

No carmaker officially opposed the law. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which counts several car manufacturers as members, said it supports the goal of protecting victims of domestic abuse. The Alliance raised some concerns about technical feasibility during the legislative process, and a spokesman said in an email on Monday it has discussed ways to potentially address those issues next year.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Saturday October 05, @05:05PM (2 children)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Saturday October 05, @05:05PM (#1375860)

    Can I have my privacy respected too please?

    • (Score: 2, Funny) by VLM on Saturday October 05, @09:20PM (1 child)

      by VLM (445) on Saturday October 05, @09:20PM (#1375887)

      Buy a superior car, instead of an "internet-connected car" get a "not-internet-connected car", those are much better.

      My guess is we're not far from the "smart TV" experience where your dashboard will be full of bloatware and advertisements unless you pay a large subscription fee.

      "Please watch this unskippable advertisement for Budweiser Beer the Breakfast of Champions before your engine can start. Following, there will be a mandatory quiz to ensure your safety."

      • (Score: 1) by anubi on Sunday October 06, @10:23PM

        by anubi (2828) on Sunday October 06, @10:23PM (#1376025) Journal

        I wonder if it will query a national database to see if you have any "wants" and if so, notify local enforcement your whereabouts, and maybe even let you drive around a bit to keep you distracted until they have you hemmed in... Then transfer control of your car to the authorities, like a "bait car". Guess what? You no longer control anything in the car, including the door locks.

        Who knows what is in proprietary encrypted code? Computers running such code can only be trusted by those who are privy to that code. To everyone else, such code can't be trusted, as no way to determine ulterior intents. Computers present ideal poker faces.

        With biometrics and facial recognition being what it has become, our wildest science fiction is becoming quite do-able.

        ,

        --
        "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 05, @06:33PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 05, @06:33PM (#1375864)

    protect domestic abuse survivors

    instances of stalking and harassment using features such as location tracking and remote controls have begun to emerge.

    No carmaker officially opposed the law. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which counts several car manufacturers as members, said it supports the goal of protecting victims of domestic abuse.

    Note 1. it's not protecting "consumers"

    Note 2. It doesn't prohibit the car manufacturers from collecting any data

    Note 3. this is about restricting what *you* can do and know about *your* car, and says nothing at all about what *they* can do with *your* travel data.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday October 05, @06:43PM (4 children)

      by HiThere (866) on Saturday October 05, @06:43PM (#1375867) Journal

      Well, your note 1 is wrong, though it does only protect a small subset of "consumers", and only in very limited ways.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Saturday October 05, @06:52PM (2 children)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 05, @06:52PM (#1375871) Journal

        I think AC's post was accurate. The law doesn't protect domestic abuse victims from being victimized by corporations or government. It only protects certain individuals from personalized stalking and monitoring from certain predators. All other predators remain enabled and empowered.

        --
        “I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
        • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 05, @07:10PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 05, @07:10PM (#1375874)

          Tampon Tim? What a child.

          • (Score: -1, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Saturday October 05, @08:30PM

            by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 05, @08:30PM (#1375880) Journal

            Yep, that's my point. Timmy hasn't learned the difference between a man and a woman, and instead caters to Kweer World. Or Planet Kweer. Or something. I'm glad you noticed.

            --
            “I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
      • (Score: 2) by DrkShadow on Saturday October 05, @08:35PM

        by DrkShadow (1404) on Saturday October 05, @08:35PM (#1375882)

        eh, hair-splitting.

(1)