Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday July 28, @07:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the jail-/prison/cell-inmates-127.0.0.1-"echo-coding" dept.

TechCrunch has an interesting report on an initiative to rehabilitate inmates in Maine:

If you omit some key details, all Preston Thorpe has to do to become a senior software engineer at a promising tech company is walk through the door.

For about six months, Thorpe was a prolific volunteer contributor to an open source project led by database company Turso. His work was impressive enough that Turso's CEO, Glauber Costa, quickly offered him a job. That was also when Costa realized that Thorpe is anything but an ordinary programmer.

"I checked his GitHub profile, and he mentions the fact that he is incarcerated," Costa told TechCrunch. "It's a story I've never seen before."

It's true: Thorpe is serving his 11th year in prison for drug-related crimes. Still, he has worked full-time from his cell at a venture-funded, San Francisco-based startup since May.

Thorpe is part of an experimental program in the Maine state prison system that allows incarcerated people to work remote jobs from custody. Though unconventional, these opportunities have proven immensely rehabilitative.

[...] The United States criminal justice system is plagued by recidivism, or former prisoners' return to custody after they have been released. Repeat offending creates a financial burden on the state and its taxpayers. But Commissioner Liberty has the data to show it's well worth the effort and investment to expand access to education and addiction treatment.

Is remote education and work a better way to rehabilitate people in prison? Are second chances worth the expense? Is the commissioner's last name a fateful omen?


Original Submission

This discussion was created by mrpg (5708) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @09:06AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @09:06AM (#1411788)

    So, what's the pay? 5 cents an hour and the state keeps the rest? I think I'd volunteer at open source instead being milked by VC.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @10:04AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @10:04AM (#1411792)

      https://www.statista.com/chart/32814/mean-hourly-wage-of-prisoners-in-state-facilities-working-regular-prison-jobs-by-state/ [statista.com]

      Oklahoma ($0.08), Missouri ($0.06) and Louisiana ($0.03). There are, however, places where inmates are even worse off. Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi and Texas don't pay prisoners in their state correctional facilities at all.

      I guess reality is the troll here....

      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by istartedi on Monday July 28, @03:20PM (2 children)

        by istartedi (123) on Monday July 28, @03:20PM (#1411815) Journal

        It really is a travesty. Not only are the inmates getting short-changed; but in some cases they are supposed to be paying restitution to victims; especially if they're in for a financial crime, theft, property damage, etc. Good luck recouping your loss when the inmate gets pennies on the dollar. The real criminals are the ones running the prisons.

        --
        Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
        • (Score: 4, Interesting) by VLM on Monday July 28, @04:50PM (1 child)

          by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 28, @04:50PM (#1411828)

          "its complicated"

          My state had a well meaning goal of increasing inmate pay to the tipped employee minimum wage, so at least waitresses can't complain that prisoners make more than them (before tips, anyway). That got torpedo'd because the people proposing the change did not understand the prison economy. Not knowing what they're doing is normal for most social engineers LOL, but this time it made the news in my state.

          Apparently there's multiple tiers of jobs, some folks are not permitted to work, which sounds relaxing, until you realize they're very poor and the prison system barely keeps them alive. If you want to brush your teeth, you must pay, the state will not help.

          The next circle of hell is the guys doing prison laundry or literally sweeping the prison floor get around 25 cents/hour but it all goes to their commissary account. The prison system does not provide free toothpaste but it does sell stuff like that at about 2x to 3x walmart prices (like walgreens or gas station convenience store prices) and an inmate not in solitary could eventually save up $5 to $10 for a tube of generic toothpaste. These wages have not gone up with inflation (not all the different than the outside LOL). If they "fixed" the pay or got rid of the low paying jobs, the inmates would be bored and the state would have to buy them toothpaste instead of getting their relatives to pay inflated prices. The economy of this tier of worker is the state refuses to pay for basic needs but they get basic needs for "free" if they volunteer to "work" 40 hours/week. The level of effort is ... not high, matching the pay.

          The next tier up is the state owned industries they make like $1/hr and this is for the better behaved inmates and they make factory-ish products for the state. The stereotypical license plate stamper, state owned furniture for state owned office buildings, run a small printing press for state forms, works of art for the state capital (engraved wood things and similar art) things like that. You're pretty wealthy by prison standards if you have a job like this.

          The next tier up from that is for the even better boys and that seems to be what the article is about. My state has a different program where they pretty much just let them out during the day on work bus but they have to sleep in the jail. I guess remote work is a similar concept except they aren't allowed out at all?

          Now get busted for drugs or fighting or whatever misbehavior, and its back down the tiers to 25 cents/hour... Thats the good side of using jobs to force good behavior. The bad side is get successfully blackmailed and intimidated or someone will make you take the fall and you're back to 25 cents/hour. So there's competing good and bad effects of using access to rehabilitative jobs as a punishment/reward.

          The numbers are not as big as people think. Muni jail for drunks is not a state prison. Federal penn for felons is not a state prison. There are a quarter million acres of oranges in Florida and google claims about 30K people work in the citrus industry overall (including or excluding illegals?), and Florida only has 80K state system prisoners, so it would be quite a stretch to replace all citrus workers in FL with state prison workers, but it's possible. The numbers are both larger than some people think while also being smaller than some people think. I live east of the mississippi river so we have tons of rain, therefore tons of trees, and 60K or so forestry and related workers, but we only have 20K state prison inmates. Not that I think it would be a great idea to give every state prison inmate a chainsaw with a stern lecture to behave.

          • (Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday July 28, @08:49PM

            by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday July 28, @08:49PM (#1411850)

            >it would be quite a stretch to replace all citrus workers in FL with state prison workers, but it's possible.

            On paper. In the field, there's a lot of trust involved in harvesting oranges. Not only that the workers won't disappear over the fences into the wilderness (which is usually pretty hospitable to living off the land for a few days, if you don't mind the mosquitoes), but also that they will pick the oranges properly (enough), not damage the trees, etc. Along the lines of handing inmates chain-saws, letting them disappear into the trees for hours at a stretch isn't exactly compatible with all inmate psych profiles.

            The real issue is: while in prison are they being rehabilitated for a successful post release life, or just being warehoused for minimal oversight cost and likely to become 'return customers" paying the prison system $50-100K/year to keep them inside, again. When the prisons are privately managed, for profit, the implications to society are beyond obvious and the US is among the lowest performing nations in the world in terms of "freedom for all."

            --
            🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 29, @05:13AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 29, @05:13AM (#1411869)
        Employee doesn't have a choice about how / when they work? Check.
        Employee is not allowed to move around? Check
        Employee works for almost nothing? Check.
        Employer takes pretty much all of the income? Check

        This is slavery.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by looorg on Monday July 28, @11:26AM

    by looorg (578) on Monday July 28, @11:26AM (#1411797)

    Now, about 30 inmates, counting Thorpe, are employed while living in the Earned Living Unit, a less restrictive prison facility for inmates who have exhibited a long track record of good behavior. All inmates with remote jobs surrender 10% of their pay to the state, plus any other payments that may be required for restitution, legal fees, or child support.

    While he was a volunteer this wasn't an issue. They tend to be unpaid. Now then he gets to at least keep 90% of his pay (-taxes and other things I would assume). I guess the 10% then cover room, food and internet access and such nice things. Question is if he can use the 90% while behind bars or if it just sits in an account accumulating interesting until release. Perhaps a minor amount goes into his kiosk account.

    Thorpe resorted to selling drugs that he bought from the dark web and ended up in prison by the time he was 20. He got out a few years later, but with no money to his name and nowhere safe to live, he was arrested again 14 months later.

    That said I assume they vet the prisoners picked for this and monitor the connections. "Drug-related, 11 years" could mean a lot of things. In his case being a drug dealer with a dark web hookup. So they wouldn't want him to be running some kind of online Silk Road drug dealing empire from behind prison bars.

    It's probably a rehabilitation process that works for him. It might not be good for all of them. Second chances are worth if it you plan on releasing the prisoners at one time and they are not going to exit prison at retirement age or in a box.

    Education is never wrong in that regard. Having people sit on a bench, reading the Bible or just looking blankly into a wall for years while eating bread and breaking rocks doesn't really make them better people. Their options upon release are then fairly limited. So if you want to let them out one day it's better to make them do something meaningful.

    Hopefully it will do something with the horrible recidivism rate. After all this guy already failed once before and was sent back again for drug dealing once more. That said this probably isn't for everyone, just like any and all programs.

    Waiting for the "AI"-stealing my jobs being replaced with "Prisoners"-stealing my jobs ...

    How is Liberty a fateful omen? Isn't it more ironic to have a prison commissioner named Liberty. It's like having the big fat guy called Tiny.

  • (Score: 4, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @11:41AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 28, @11:41AM (#1411798)

    > It's true: Thorpe is serving his 11th year in prison for drug-related crimes.

    At this point he'll get out of jail, *legally* pick up some weed at the corner, and sit down to code -- like he always used to do. This time, without running afoul of the state's quarterly metrics, like happened last time.

    How's this dev different from all the others? Luck of the draw.

    • (Score: 2) by looorg on Monday July 28, @04:39PM (1 child)

      by looorg (578) on Monday July 28, @04:39PM (#1411825)

      Technically it appears that he sold drugs he had bought of the dark web. If he got high on his own supply the story doesn't tell. What his drug of choice is also left blank. Also getting out and getting high again might not be in his best interest. If he gets parole that is like an instant ticket back to prison if/when caught.

      That said in the end of his blog post there is some mentioning of legal issues. So he is not getting out early. Which is a bit odd. He would seem like a model prisoner in some regard. A figurehead of success for the program. One would think he would be a given for early release. Perhaps it's not all sunshine and rainbows in prison-work land.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Undefined on Tuesday July 29, @02:42PM

        by Undefined (50365) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 29, @02:42PM (#1411900)

        Perhaps it's not all sunshine and rainbows in prison-work land.

        It's 100% consistent in and out of prison. When these prisoners get out, they'll have that public criminal record that will prevent them from being hired by... well, almost every business out there. The system is fundamentally designed for retribution. There's no actual intent to rehabilitate.

        It's been like that for some time (basically since effective access to criminal records became available to business), but now that businesses are moving to ML system triage of records, resumes and job applications... looks like the creation and maintainance of the US's locked-in underclass is complete.

        --
        I use a dedicated preprocessor to elaborate abbreviations.
        Hover your mouse over any abbreviation to see any you are unfamiliar with.

        --
        I use a dedicated preprocessor to elaborate abbreviations.
        Hover to reveal elaborations.
(1)