Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday January 28, @03:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the counting-flowers-on-the-wall dept.

Review of studies shows meeting face-to-face has more benefits:

A review of more than 1,000 studies suggests that using technology to communicate with others is better than nothing – but still not as good as face-to-face interactions.

Researchers found that people are less engaged and don't have the same positive emotional responses when they use technology, like video calls or texting, to connect with others, compared to when they meet in person.

The results were clear, said Brad Bushman, co-author of the study and professor of communication at The Ohio State University.

"If there is no other choice than computer-mediated communication, then it is certainly better than nothing," Bushman said. "But if there is a possibility of meeting in person, then using technology instead is a poor substitute."

The study was published online yesterday (Jan. 6, 2026) in the journal Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Lead author Roy Baumeister, professor of psychology at the University of Queensland, said: "Electronic communication is here to stay, so we need to learn how to integrate it into our lives. But if it replaces live interactions, you're going to be missing some important benefits and probably be less fulfilled."

Research has shown the importance of social interactions for psychological and physical health. But the issue for computer-mediated communication is that it is "socializing alone," the researchers said. You are communicating with others, but you're by yourself when you do it. The question becomes, is that important?

[...] A good example of the superiority of in-person communication is laughter, Bushman said. "We found a lot of research that shows real health benefits to laughing out loud, but we couldn't find any health benefits to typing LOL in a text or social media post," he said.

Another key finding was that numerous studies showed that educational outcomes were superior in in-person classes compared to those done online. Some of these studies were conducted during the COVID pandemic, when teachers were forced to teach their students online.

As might be expected, video calls were better than texting for boosting positive emotions, the research showed. Being removed in both time and space makes texting and non-live communication less beneficial for those participating.

Results were mixed regarding negative emotions. Computer-mediated communication may reduce some forms of anxiety.

"Shy people in particular seem to feel better about interacting online, where they can type their thoughts into a chat box, and don't have to call as much attention to themselves," Baumeister said.

But there was also a dark side. Some people are more likely to express negative comments online than they would in person. Inhibitions against saying something harmful are reduced online, results showed.

In general, the research found that group dynamics, including learning, were not as effective online as they were in person.

[...] The benefits of modern technology for communication in some situations are indisputable, according to Bushman. But this review shows that it does come with some costs.

"Humans were shaped by evolution to be highly social," Bushman said. "But many of the benefits of social interactions are lost or reduced when you interact with people who are not present with you."

The researchers noted that concerns about the impact of technology on human communication go way back. Almost a century ago, sociologists were concerned that the telephone would reduce people visiting in person with neighbors.

"There is a long history of unconfirmed predictions that various innovations will bring disaster, so one must be skeptical of alarmist projections," the authors wrote in the paper.

"Then again, the early returns are not encouraging."

Journal Reference: Baumeister, R. F., Bibby, M. T., Tice, D. M., & Bushman, B. J. (2026). Socializing While Alone: Loss of Impact and Engagement When Interacting Remotely via Technology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251404368


Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by Rich on Wednesday January 28, @06:28PM (2 children)

    by Rich (945) on Wednesday January 28, @06:28PM (#1431653) Journal

    Sociologists studying studies. I'd say that real science compares to that like a wild party with friends compares to chatting with an AI. A three-year old AI in form of a non-reasoning LLM with 1.3B parameters and a 2K context window. Running on Windows 8.

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday January 28, @08:05PM (1 child)

      by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday January 28, @08:05PM (#1431659)

      When it put it that way, how *are* research sociologists' parties? I bet they're pretty fun.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday January 28, @08:21PM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday January 28, @08:21PM (#1431664)

        Sociologist I had in college wrote the book for the class, I'd guess he was pretty fun at parties - he had a fixation on the varying sexual practices of uncontacted Amazonian tribes...

        --
        🌻🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday January 28, @08:47PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday January 28, @08:47PM (#1431668)

    It's all about keeping the neural pathways firing, and those in-person (call it socialization, call it fight or flight, whatever is happening behind your eyes...) interactions are naturally going to exercise more of your cortices than some hunt-and-peck responses to text on a screen. If you're not doing _something_ to stimulate those pathways, they're going to atrophy and that is a good first step toward depression for a lot of (far from all) people.

    Along the same lines as why many people got so messed up after COVID took their sense of smell away - cut off from front-end input, none of the back end is getting those stimuli anymore.

    99% out of left field, this is a fun short story that mostly speculatively dives into other issues around what happens when a brain is disconnected from the inputs it developed with, copied, pasted, replayed...: https://qntm.org/mmacevedo [qntm.org]

    --
    🌻🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, @11:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, @11:14PM (#1431696)

    The social people study the social aspects and conclude being social is better. Surprise.

    Now look at various groups and types of people. Computer people have been using IRC, mailing lists, etc etc etc for working together as large groups since the 80's. Sales people, when you e-mail them, send an e-mail back, "Call me!"

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by krishnoid on Wednesday January 28, @11:16PM (3 children)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday January 28, @11:16PM (#1431697)

    Research has shown the importance of social interactions for psychological and physical health. But the issue for computer-mediated communication is that it is "socializing alone," the researchers said. You are communicating with others, but you're by yourself when you do it. The question becomes, is that important?

    I've considered for about a decade that as humans, we've co-evolved with our senses, since our entire perception of the external world has been through them through the history of the species of all mammals (and earlier). With online communication, we get visual input and pass it through our language center, and hit tactile input and motor centers along the way. That doesn't reflect our total experience on this planet -- if it did, visiting nature wouldn't be a thing. Heck, neither would pets.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, @11:49PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, @11:49PM (#1431700)

      In the past, people would Read a Book. It was pleasureable, and relaxing.

      Need information? Go to the library, and pick up a book!

      Today's Tik-tok crowd, always needing social confirmation, wasn't a thing. Today's "Meetings are better; hey err'yone, paaaaarty!!!" doesn't work for me. Put me in a loud environment with people all around, and I simply can't concentrate or think. Productivity drops to 50%.

      To each their own. These people need to stop grouping all types of people together as 100% the same - it's harmful.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by krishnoid on Thursday January 29, @01:10AM (1 child)

        by krishnoid (1156) on Thursday January 29, @01:10AM (#1431715)

        Group me people thoughts order correct sentence not correct deduplicate sometimes usually concepts arrange coherent concept.

        Or ...

        It sometimes takes me a few edits when responding, to order my thoughts in a grammatically correct, coherent way that sequences them in the order in which I want to express them based on clarity, emphasis, and/or chronology. I figure most people do the same thing, but a lot of people tend to sound-bite their ideas, and some are better able to orate their points.

        Thinking about it, I wonder if it has to do with individual differences in neuronal transmittivity, quantity/selection of responders, and/or priority of the language center. It certainly takes me a second or later draft to convert subject descriptors into adjectives and adverbs and move them to precede their targets.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, @02:29AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, @02:29AM (#1431838)

          I suck at Jumble (puzzle with letters scrambled) so I asked Gemini. It took longer than I remember other short requests, but might have done OK?

          Re-order these words to make a coherent sentence: Group me people thoughts order correct sentence not correct deduplicate sometimes usually concepts arrange coherent concept.

          That word cloud is a bit of a jigsaw puzzle, isn't it? It looks like you've got a mix of instructions and the actual subject matter.

          If we filter out the meta-talk (like "deduplicate" and "correct"), the most coherent way to arrange these concepts is:

          "People usually group thoughts and arrange concepts to order a coherent sentence."

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by Snotnose on Thursday January 29, @12:07AM

    by Snotnose (1623) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 29, @12:07AM (#1431703)

    It's hard enough to pay attention when the only things to look at are my co-workers. Much harder at home when I can look at my cat, the picture on the wall, the picture of my gf, gee the carpet needs vacuuming, huh? Can you repeat the question?

    --
    Trump's Grave will be the world's most popular open air toilet.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by turgid on Thursday January 29, @08:09AM (1 child)

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 29, @08:09AM (#1431741) Journal

    What do you want from us? Productivity or chit-chat?

    I hate offices. They're invariably open plan, unless you're the PHB. You get to hear and see everything, whether you want to or not. That includes the guy who spends the first hour and a half every morning doing his "I'm a great guy" routine in front of his team, the finance people on a speakerphone call trying to figure out how to divide one quantity by another, the motivational PHB saying, "Can we do a diff?" and the Windows developer asking how big a pointer is on Linux every afternoon at 3 o'clock.

    I also don't want to hear about your very latest far-right political revelation or the historical accuracy of Noah's Ark. I don't want to hear your sexist and racist attempts at jokes. I don't care who won the football.

    There's a deadline coming up, a customer waiting for a product that's already late, PHBs who have told them lies about the status, and about 18 months worth of code to get done in the next three weeks. Oh, and you'll decide we need some sort of training on top of that.

    If that's social, I'll give it a miss, thanks. I've got things to do.

    There are certain things I'd like to be in the office for, but not while all that rubbish is going on.

    And then you'll come out of your PHB fish tank, take us into a meeting room and tell us we need to be more productive.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by EEMac on Thursday January 29, @10:11AM

      by EEMac (6423) on Thursday January 29, @10:11AM (#1431752)

      > What do you want from us? Productivity or chit-chat?

      The extroverts have clearly voted for chit-chat.

(1)