Source: BBC Television.
The UK Police have announced that all 5 men arrested in connection with the suspected terrorist attack attempt at RAF Fairford are UK nationals in their 20s from the London area.
For previous reporting see: https://soylentnews.org/breakingnews/article.pl?sid=26/09/27/115249
The Head of Counter Terrorism Police (CTP) has given an public announcement at 15:45 BST:
The 5 individuals who have been arrested are being released on police bail with significant restrictions on who they may contact, on reporting regularly and movement. They remain under investigation.
They are currently being released while remaining under charges relating to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). No mention was made relating to earlier charges.
The CTP have numerous new leads that they are following. They are keeping an open mind about who might ultimately be behind the attempt. They stress that it must be remembered that individuals may be used as proxies without necessarily knowing who is directing the attempt, or even knowing that they were being manipulated.
The alert states at both Fairford and Lakenheath remain as previously announced.
The Head of CTP stated that the alert was raised by 2 phone calls made by civilians. Nothing was said about any prior intelligence.
The latest statement by the CTP (19:25BST 29 Sep 2026):
No explosives were found in the vehicles used by the 5 men arrested near RAF Fairford. A quantity of vehicle fuel was found. Searches of the homes of the 5 men have not revealed anything significant to the investigation.
Without any further evidence the individuals were released on bail. The decision was based on insufficient evidence to justify holding the 5 offenders longer although they could always be re-arrested if it is subsequently justified, and 'strategic' considerations. The investigation is continuing with close liaison between the relevant security agencies in the UK, and with the US.
Source: BBC (07:01BST 30 Sep 2026)
One of the 5 men arrested in connection with the incident near RAF Fairford had phoned the police (999) himself.
Source BBC Television News: (17:18 BST 30 Sep 2026)
The Prime Minister has stated that the UK now believe that Iran was linked to the attempted attack on RAF Fairford.
The Iranian Ambassador has strongly denied any connection with the incident.
« Astronomers Estimate That the Moon's Water Reserves Are Insufficient to Sustain a Lunar City | The FAA is Testing an AI-Powered Air Traffic Management Tool »
Related Stories
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/09/27/uk/fairford-arrests-uk-raf-us-intl
UK counter-terrorism police are leading an investigation after several men were arrested on suspicion of explosives offenses near an air base used by US forces.
A number of properties were evacuated in the Whelford area in the county of Gloucestershire "following the declaration of a major incident," a police statement said.
"The Army's specialist explosive ordnance disposal team are currently examining a number of vehicles," the statement said
Whelford is close to the Royal Air Force base at Fairford which has been used by US B-1 bombers involved in targeting Iran and is a forward operating location for US Global Strike Command, which is tasked with managing long-distance strikes.
A US air force spokesperson at Fairford - where the 501st Combat Support Wing is based - told CNN: "For operational security reasons we will not discuss specific force protection measures."
The unit "remains vigilant and will take appropriate actions to ensure the safety and security of our US service members, civilians, contractors, and their families," the spokesperson said.
The threat level at RAF Fairford has been raised to Delta. The threat level at RAF Lakenheath, which is also used by the USAF, has been raised to Charlie.
Threat level Delta suggests that there was prior intelligence to the potential attack and there is a large police presence deployed around the base.
As yet there has been no statement attributing the disrupted attack to any specific nation or organisation.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqrm99mm9l84o
UK counter-terrorism police are leading an investigation in which several men were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences near an RAF station which hosts the United States Air Force (USAF).
An Army explosive ordnance disposal team has been examining vehicles near RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and homes in the nearby village of Whelford have been evacuated while investigations continue, police said.
The men were detained early on Sunday and a Hazardous Area Response Team has been deployed inside a security cordon at the base but officers believe the incident is contained.
The base has been recently used to deploy USAF bombers since the country's conflict in Iran began in February.
In March, four USAF bombers landed at RAF Fairford and the US started using British bases for "specific defensive operations" against Iranian missile sites after then prime minister Sir Keir Starmer granted permission for "defensive" US action from UK bases.
A government spokesperson said Prime Minister Andy Burnham was receiving regular updates on the evolving situation.
A police statement has just been made (13:56 BST):
Three suspicious white vans were reported by a telephone call to be heading towards the Fairford area at 12:45 am
Police stopped the vehicles and have detained 5 men, who remain in custody. They are held under suspicion of committing offences related to the Explosives Act.
The vehicles are being investigated by a military Explosive Ordnance Disposal team.
The police have just announced that the 5 detained men have been further charged with preparation of a terrorist act. [Corrected at 1427BST--JR]
[UPDATE Source: BBC] The police have announced that the 5 detained men are all UK nationals in their 20s.
Source BBC Television News: (17:18 BST Sep 2026)
The Prime Minister has stated that the UK now believe that Iran was behind to the attempted attack on RAF Fairford.
The Iranian Ambassador has strongly denied any connection with the incident.
See previous reporting: https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=26/09/28/1259254 https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=26/09/27/115249
Source: BBC News: 07:18 BST 02 Oct 2026
The police have confirmed the arrest of a dual nationality (UK/Iran) man in the London area, linked to the incident at RAF Fairford on Sunday.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @01:31PM (13 children)
Current UK population is over 70 million, recruiting, training / grooming and deployment of agents from within countries' own borders is far easier than ever before in history.
In the 1940s, your agents would have to operate in enemy territory, appearing to be normal citizens but having secret meetings, recruiting - failing, and every time they failed to recruit that was a risk that they would be exposed as a foreign agent.
In today's global society, agents of any country can recruit, train / groom and deploy within any other nation's borders among their population. They can troll message boards, and when they fail at a recruitment, they just throw that identity away and spin up a new online persona to try again. The old tactic of rounding up ethnic Japanese into camps because we are at war with Japan is no longer necessary or effective - Japan is as likely to recruit vulnerable non-Japanese high school kids from Missouri as they are to convert any ex-pats to agents, more likely in fact through false-flag operation.
Then we can talk about the US landscape where any fresh recruit can legally purchase semi-automatic weapons and large quantities of ammunuition without raising suspicion...
Hand-grenades are a little harder to come by, but 20 years ago in Houston there was street chatter about "how much damage can two guys in a pickup truck with a box of hand-grenades do before they are stopped?" The way the infrastructure is laid out around Houston, that answer is easily in the hundreds of millions of dollars of direct physical damage and follow-on effects of service disruptions...
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @01:38PM (12 children)
Or, and hear me out on this one. Stop bombing and invading countries in the middle east.
(Score: 4, Touché) by PiMuNu on Monday September 28, @01:40PM (6 children)
> Stop bombing and invading countries in the middle east.
Good luck when $DICTATORSHIP grows nukes.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by turgid on Monday September 28, @01:55PM
I dare say bombing them just makes them more determined in future. I'm sure there are better ways.
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent [wikipedia.org].
(Score: 3, Touché) by epitaxial on Monday September 28, @03:51PM (2 children)
You mean like North Korea?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Reziac on Tuesday September 29, @02:34AM (1 child)
I am convinced North Korea's nuclear posturing is not actually aimed at the U.S.
Rather, it is aimed at discouraging China from invading (a very real and historic risk).
Basically: "Our nukes can reach America! and Beijing is a lot closer..."
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 30, @07:07AM
Why would China invade NK? China is actively propping up NK. Probably to avoid millions of refugees. An invasion will just create more problems for China.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93North_Korea_relations#Economic_relations [wikipedia.org]
https://www.dw.com/en/china-north-korea-economy-trade-geo-economics-exports-revenues/a-77295494 [dw.com]
It's the US which might do stupid stuff with NK. The US has a far greater track record of screwing countries up for no good reason (good reasons do not include making the military corporations richer). Plenty of examples.
The US has threatened NK before:
https://time.com/4947942/trump-totally-destroy-threatens-north-korea-un-speech-transcript/ [time.com]
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/january-29/bush-describes-iraq-iran-north-korea-as-axis-of-evil [history.com]
And that's where the nukes come in. If the US tries to regime change NK, NK may try to nuke Japan: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/09/20/japan/north-korea-missiles-september-20/ [japantimes.co.jp]
North Korea is doing the hostage stuff with Japan. That's the only target NK can nuke without it being a complete suicide. Nuking China is like nuking their food and energy supply. Nuking SK is like nuking their own back garden (only if nuking Japan fails).
If you woke up tomorrow as the leader of North Korea you'd probably do the same thing if you wanted to stay alive - keep nukes, hold Japan hostage with them.
(Score: 2) by higuita on Tuesday September 29, @02:42AM (1 child)
>> Stop bombing and invading countries in the middle east.
>Good luck when $DICTATORSHIP grows nukes.
Like say USA and Israel? both have people that think it is a good idea to use nukes in Iran...
Or Russia, as also some around Putin think it would be a good idea to use nukes in Ukraine
But on the other hand, countries with nukes aren't bullied as hard, if Iran had nukes, diplomacy would he used instead of bombs... and maybe Israel attacks and land take over on Gaza and West Bank would really be stopped... and bombing, demolition and again, land grab in Libano and Syria would have stopped already.
The true is that the Israel/Palestinian problem is still unsolved 60 years later and is still the infection that is creating radicals all over the place.
Dictators like Netanyahu, Trump and whatever decided the Hamas attack, that think that brute force is the good solution and not really care about their own people make everything even worse and common population is the one suffering.
Lastly, where are the Iraq WMD? you believed in that story at that time and later found that was fake... why should we believe that Iran was near of building nukes now? Because Israel and he CIA said so? Sure, they can be trusted, they never lie!! /facepalm
But if i was a Iranian, even if i didn't want to make nukes before, after all this, sure thing that i would make it now a priority, being bullied can make you more dangerous
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 29, @08:16AM
Netanyahu is working on a solving that once and for all. A final solution if you will.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @02:18PM (4 children)
> Stop bombing and invading countries in the middle east.
Oh, but they're scary. We can't have scary people becoming powerful, gotta keep them powerless and non-frightening.
Honestly, I don't understand why these old women (of both sexes Ben Franklin used to say, but these old women all were mostly born with dicks - not sure about Maggie...) don't just do a genocide and get it out of their systems. Hitler went there, Bangladesh – 1971, Burundi – 1972, Cambodia – 1975–1979, East Timor – 1975–1999, Guatemala – 1981–1983, Iraq – 1986–1989, Rwanda – 1994. Bosnia and Herzegovina – 1995, Sudan – 2003–present, Iraq – 2014, Myanmar – 2016–present... people get too scary, or annoying, other people with more power (and less confidence / strength of character) decide to kill-em-all while they can. Ask the Neandertals how that goes...
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by HiThere on Monday September 28, @04:39PM (3 children)
My model of the Neanderthal decline was this:
They had a small population widely spread. The Cro Magnon lived in larger groups and more closely together. When the two interacted (i.e. crossbred), Neanderthal genes got diluted until we don't even see most of them. Also it's probably that crosses were more likely to lead to maternal deaths. (The babies heads were shaped slightly differently.)
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @04:46PM (2 children)
Everything you say may be true... and simultaneously with the theory that Cro Magnon tended to have larger groups of guys carrying rocks and spears, so when they interacted in non-friendly ways the Cro Magnon tended to have infinitely more survivors of the event.
My model of the deep past is that peace and violence were both present in significant amounts. Even if violence happens on less than 1/1000 days, that's still exposing most children to one or more violent events before they get the opportunity to breed.
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Monday September 28, @08:33PM (1 child)
Certainly there is evidence that there was occasional violence...sometimes of a rather extreme nature. But I think that you overestimate the frequency (of the more extreme kind). And I think (without evidence) that it was more frequently directed at "Those bastards over the hill" than at a wandering group of hunters. Exogamy was (I believe) a common practice. It's generally common enough that people will make temporary peace with their traditional enemies to engage in a bit of mate swapping. (I'm not going to guess whether it was the women or the men who were usually swapped before herding/agriculture.)
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @09:11PM
>more frequently directed at "Those bastards over the hill" than at a wandering group of hunters.
I thiink extreme violence tends to be directed at "scary people," both contemporary and in the deeper past. Xenophobia isn't limited to homo sapiens or even higher mammals.
>Exogamy was (I believe) a common practice.
My father's mother's mother's family bible charts a family tree back another 5-6 generations, and in there are multiple "blank leaves" because the mother / father lacked a christian name, and we (the older generations of "we") don't write heathen names into our (Southern Baptist) Bible... By all accounts those were happy unions lasting a lifetime producing multiple offspring... so, yes, even in more modern times with all kinds of social pressures including ostricization from "polite society," exogamy still had a strong lure... really it's just good genetics.
> not going to guess whether it was the women or the men who were usually swapped
My junior college Sociology professor (who wrote the book for the class) would tell you: every imaginable combination has been practiced somewhere at some time. The only semi-universal taboos are those with real easily observable negative consequences, and even they get a pass now and then. Cannibalism doesn't usually spread far or last too long, and incest - although that same family bible did show one christian man "participating" on two levels of the tree... Other than those two, women can be leaders / dominant, virgins can be customarily/ritually deflowered by locals, strangers, or random acts, all kinds of partial (and full) nudity can be acceptable / discouraged / abhorrent, monogamy is by no means the only form of accepted/encouraged short or long term mating, etc. While that professor had a practiced ease talking about all kinds of human-societal relationships he shied away from discussion of bestiality - he implied that talking about it had potential to get him fired...
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 5, Informative) by pTamok on Monday September 28, @03:22PM (12 children)
I'm not saying this is correct, but this is a non-mainstream view on things:
https://www.councilestatemedia.uk/p/was-fairford-the-most-embarrassing [councilestatemedia.uk]
...and a follow up to mainstream media's initial take of 'Iranians'
https://mstdn.social/@newsthump@mastodon.online/117348694615964992 [mstdn.social]
(Score: 3, Touché) by epitaxial on Monday September 28, @06:17PM (11 children)
All the suspects were released on bail. It sounds as if the farmer somehow knew they were terrorists just by looking at them. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c65y7nl29k0et [bbc.com]
"I am absolutely staggered that it was left to me as a member of the public to see and report this. I believe that my 999 call foiled whatever plans they had."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @06:43PM (2 children)
He must've missed Donald Trump taking credit. Shame he didn't call them out as I-ranian radical wokist lunatics too. Although we know for sure that's where we'll end up.
(Score: 2) by epitaxial on Monday September 28, @07:05PM (1 child)
Farmer is reported as "she".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @08:46PM
No wonder it's fake news then.
(Score: 2) by driverless on Tuesday September 29, @08:48AM (7 children)
As soon as I saw that these dangerous terrorists were all released on bail a day or so after being apprehended I figured I'd sit back with some popcorn and wait for the major egg-on-face revelations to come out. Somebody done fscked up big time.
(Score: 3, Informative) by janrinok on Tuesday September 29, @11:26AM (6 children)
Nobody did anything that they shouldn't have done, other than the 5 who were arrested.
The police armed response was exactly what is supposed to happen when there is suspicion of a event that might involve terrorism taking place. Their handling of the suspects was textbook. The base at Fairford was already on alert and had been for some time. The police are not supposed to touch any potential explosives until the EOD team have been called out and declared that it is safe to proceed. That process (3 vehicles and many unidentified black containers) took over 24 hours. The CTP has to be involved if there is a possibility of a connection with terrorism. They have interviewed the 5 detained persons and are for the moment satisfied that they are not knowingly involved with such an incident. Nevertheless, they are probably facing other charges.
The interviews have revealed 'multiple leads' that the CTP must now investigate. Rubio has stated (although he has not substantiated his statement with any evidence) that it is evident that a 'foreign power' is involved.
The UK way of doing things is better than in many other countries where it appears that the police shoot first and then lie when no evidence of a crime can be found.
(Score: 2) by driverless on Tuesday September 29, @11:38AM (1 child)
We don't actually need real terrorists any more when we've become so good at terrorising ourselves. Obviously a bunch of randos stealing diesel in a rural paddock has to be a terrorist plot by a foreign power.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 29, @02:42PM
I suppose that to Rubio we are a foreign power... And the 'terrorists' came from London. What more evidence does he need?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 29, @01:40PM
And how about claiming credit for the greatest anti-terrorist action EVER!!!?!!! RUBIO SAY SOMETHING!111
(Score: 2) by epitaxial on Tuesday September 29, @07:43PM (2 children)
Common sense would tell you these guys were probably stealing farm diesel. The odds of a terror attack happening are astronomical.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday September 30, @04:19AM (1 child)
The police found petrol in one of the containers but no diesel. Both fuels are expensive at the moment and either would be worth stealing in the current situation.
The 3 vehicles were not parked close to a source of red diesel - or any significant quantity of diesel for that matter - but there were quite a few private vehicles also parked nearby. The full containers would have been difficult to move quietly for any distance.
The police have not said what they currently believe the 5 arrested men were actually doing so we can only speculate.
There has been a recent increase in the security state at RAF Fairford so there appears to be some threat that has recently been identified, but this occurred before the incident that made the headlines. Additional measures to protect the airfield had been noticed as much as a week before the reported incident. I am guessing that there is some intelligence regarding a potential threat which would explain why Trump/Rubio believe this was a genuine attack. but the CTP are keeping an open mind. As you suggested, they are probably suspecting that this was an attempt to steal fuel (the type is irrelevant) which coincidentally triggered the response that we have witnessed. The US view is either not (IMO) being objective in its analysis of the facts and they are wanting to make the incident fit their intelligence, or they have something that they are not sharing with the UK despite their praise of the level of cooperation that they are receiving from the UK.
You also have to remember that any successful attack - no matter how unlikely the odds might seem against it actually happening - would be a major win for the terrorists. During the IRA troubles there were only a handful of successful attacks against UK forces stationed in the UK and Europe but the increased security and protection of personnel and their families had to be continuously maintained 24/7 for over a decade. The disruption that the additional security measures caused carried a huge cost implication and a change in the day-to-day life of tens of thousands of people. School buses had to vary routes, people had to switch to less popular stores and markets, vehicles had to be checked for IEDs before you got into them and this included private vehicles that might only have been parked outside a shop or a restaurant for an hour or two and were being used by civilian contractors or family members. Being critical about the response to a 'false alarm' is meaningless as soon as a single person is killed or injured in a genuine attack. This is simply the world that we now live in, possibly for years to come. It is another cost of starting a war without a clear exit plan against a determined enemy.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by janrinok on Wednesday September 30, @04:32AM
I forgot to add...
Putin has lost a significant number of his nuclear capable bombers over the last year or two, somewhere around 30% I think. Even optimistically, they cannot be replaced in anything less than a decade as a completely new aircraft will be required.
Russia is still considered to be in the frame as it would enable them to strike at the US nuclear-capable bombers while they are deployed at Fairford. We mustn't become too focussed on one specific enemy while ignoring others, particularly if it meant that another country might even be blamed for the attack. This wouldn't be the only action being taken by Russia in Europe during recent months.
The CTP and security forces are wise to keep their options open until there is clear evidence which identifies the 'foreign actor' behind this threat.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Whoever on Monday September 28, @03:57PM (12 children)
The fact that they were released on bail suggests that the "plot" wasn't very serious.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @04:41PM (7 children)
Which just gets weirder - were there or were there not actual explosives in the vans?
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 2) by epitaxial on Monday September 28, @06:11PM
Unlikely they found any. The news says they brought out all the anti terror toys to examine the vans. Not a peep about anything being discovered let alone disposed of. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqrm99mm9l84o [bbc.com]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by janrinok on Monday September 28, @07:11PM (5 children)
The original charge was "Suspicion of explosive offences .....". which is exactly what I reported.
After that, many people and the press jumped to the conclusion that there were explosive found. What they found were large black containers in the vehicles. Until the Explosive Ordnance Disposal team did their job nobody knew what was in the black containers. So the answer would appear to be "No, explosives were not actually found".
Others decided without any evidence to back their claims up that the 5 individuals were obviously arab jihadists, probably Iranian. Someone claimed that it was intended to blow up a barracks. If people would just read the facts and discuss the possibilities rather than jump to incorrect conclusions (and let those responsible for our security do their job!) it would have been far better than much of what I have read.
It is possible, but entirely speculative, that the 5 concerned had been conned into conducting a 'dummy run' by others who wanted to know how easy it would be to carry out the real attack. That might be one of the many lines of inquiry that the CTP are now investigating.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @07:15PM (4 children)
I worked at a Jewish owned business on Miami Beach. One day we walked out and there was an extremely average looking rather large black briefcase left beside the door... I think there were some relatively hot world events at the time with bombings in Jerusalem or something similar, anyway, out of an abundance of caution we called it in as "suspicious parcel" and they sent the bomb squad. The bomb squad arrived about 3 minutes before the owner of the briefcase returned to pick it up, had set it down and driven off by mistake. The squad had already run an exterior sniffer, asked the owner for a peek inside which he readily complied with, ran the sniffer all through the papers on the inside. Just another day on Miami Beach.
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday September 28, @07:17PM (3 children)
Interestingly, they haven't said what was in the black containers.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by pTamok on Monday September 28, @08:11PM (2 children)
Either air, (empty) or (red) diesel. It appears they were a gang of agricultural thieves, looking to siphon (red) diesel from/for agricultural machinery and steal portable equipment. The farmer who reported them could have been a potential or actual victim, and the fact they were near to a military base was not connected, other than the thieves were probably somewhat surprised to be confronted by armed (anti-terrorist) police, as agricultural theft is not exactly treated as high priority by the police.
(Score: 2) by choose another one on Tuesday September 29, @07:12PM (1 child)
This.
Large fuel containers, probably empty going to be used to nick farm diesel, but been used before hence plenty of oil fumes, first responders open van see big barrels smell fumes... bomb shout.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday September 29, @07:28PM
See the latest update (TFS). There was fuel found - but only petrol. They were quite possibly intending to siphon fuel from other vehicles.
(Score: 1, Troll) by DadaDoofy on Monday September 28, @04:53PM
It all depends on who is doing the releasing.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @05:42PM (2 children)
Or they're tards. UK released a bunch of rapists too and told some caught in the act to "carry on". Orange man talked about it so why not release them. Of course they'll show up and not disappear. Pinky swear.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @06:46PM
This one? https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jul/28/us-airman-accused-of-spree-of-rapes-on-sleeping-women-avoided-uk-courts [theguardian.com]
(Score: 3, Troll) by janrinok on Monday September 28, @07:15PM
The UK view, being very diplomatically stated, is the Orange Man is talking crap again.
Alternatively, he might have compromised an ongoing operation that is watching a specific group of people.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @07:18PM (5 children)
This is starting to make sense:
CIA hires 3 drivers to drive sus looking vans to the base with sketchy instructions.
What's going down in the news that this is distracting from?
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 2) by epitaxial on Monday September 28, @08:14PM (4 children)
Epstein
Fuel prices
Food prices
Healthcare
Inflation
Jobs
Take your pic.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @08:48PM (3 children)
In fact, those things are detracting our attention from the greatest president of all time! Not even joking.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 28, @08:51PM (2 children)
After all, He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named did great things—terrible, yes, but great.
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 28, @10:37PM
Bill Gates?
(Score: 2) by arslan on Monday September 28, @10:45PM
but you are winning!
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday September 29, @06:39PM
See TFS for the latest update by the Head of the CTP.
In brief, no explosives were found in the vehicles used for the incident near to RAF Fairford.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by janrinok on Wednesday September 30, @06:14AM
I didn't.
The BBC News is revealing that one of the 5 men arrested at the incident in Fairford had phoned the police himself at 12:45am. A second phone call, from the farmer, was made at 01:36am.
The source is apparently a police spokesperson. The twists and turns in this incident are making my head spin. There is obviously a lot of information that is not being shared with the public, which is right and proper, but which is leaving the public confused.