Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Breaking News
posted by on Saturday February 13 2016, @11:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the sad-song-from-the-supremes dept.

Antonin Scalia, a sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice, has died:

US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia - one of most conservative members of the high court - has died. Justice Scalia's death could shift the balance of power on the US high court, allowing President Barack Obama to add a fifth liberal justice to the court. The court's conservative majority has recently stalled major efforts by the Obama administration on climate change and immigration.

Justice Scalia, 79, was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986. He died in his sleep early on Saturday while in West Texas for [a] hunting trip, the US Marshall service said. Justice Scalia was one of the most prominent proponents of "originalism" - a conservative legal philosophy that believes the US Constitution has a fixed meaning and does not change with the times.

Justice Scalia's death is, unsurprisingly, now being widely reported.

From the San Antonio Express News:

According to a report, Scalia arrived at the ranch on Friday and attended a private party with about 40 people. When he did not appear for breakfast, a person associated with the ranch went to his room and found a body.

[...] The U.S. Marshal Service, the Presidio County sheriff and the FBI were involved in the investigation. Officials with the law enforcement agencies declined to comment.

A federal official who asked not to be named said there was no evidence of foul play and it appeared that Scalia died of natural causes.

A gray Cadillac hearse pulled into the ranch last Saturday afternoon. The hearse came from Alpine Memorial Funeral Home.

Most major news outlets are covering this story, including CNN [video autoplays], The Washington Post, The New York Times, and NBC.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Sunday February 14 2016, @06:40AM

    So you feel bad for them, but don't understand their loss or pain?

    I understand their loss and pain, this is why they have my sympathy (generated by the intellectual/analytical side of my brain and past life experiences). I just don't have enough empathy to feel for them after I feel for the dying kids.

    empathy (n) [merriam-webster.com]:
      the feeling that you understand and share another person's experiences and emotions : the ability to share someone else's feelings

    sympathy (n) [merriam-webster.com]:
      the feeling that you care about and are sorry about someone else's trouble, grief, misfortune, etc. : a sympathetic feeling

    Your point?

    Two actually:
    * don't require me or expect me (or other SN community members) to have empathy for Scalia's family and don't try to make me (or anyone else) guilty for not having it; (clod I may be, but) I'm not insensitive - just limited in my capacity to feel for all the loses on this planet.

    I don't require or expect anything from anyone. As I explicitly said [soylentnews.org]:

    I don't tell other people how they should think or feel.

    * and definitely, don't climb a high horse over the others - they may not be insensitive either, even if they don't feel for Scalia family's loss.

    Believe what your like. I will do the same. If advocating for simple kindness and respect for human dignity is getting "on my high horse" then I'm guilty as charged. I have my own beliefs and sense of ethics. I don't really care if others agree. However, that doesn't mean I'm going to keep my mouth shut just because you (or anyone else) doesn't like what I have to say. Don't like it? Ignore me. Or respond to me. Or do whatever you like. That's your choice, not mine.

    (and don't tell me you didn't mean any of the above. Read your posts and see if, on a cursory reading, these interpretations can be excluded)

    I think I just did. And I have read my posts -- heck, I even wrote them. If you took what I said as anything beyond my expression of my thoughts and ideas, the fault lies either with your comprehension, my exposition or both.

    Again, as I explicitly stated, I don't attempt to prescribe how others should think, feel or speak. I do, however, feel free to use speech to express how I think and feel.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday February 14 2016, @06:53AM

    by c0lo (156) on Sunday February 14 2016, @06:53AM (#304021) Journal

    Again, as I explicitly stated, I don't attempt to prescribe how others should think, feel or speak. I do, however, feel free to use speech to express how I think and feel.

    I'm cool with that. Heck, I respect that, even.

    I think I just did. And I have read my posts -- heck, I even wrote them. If you took what I said as anything beyond my expression of my thoughts and ideas, the fault lies either with your comprehension, my exposition or both.

    Most probable with both, methinks. Ta

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0