Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
Breaking News
posted by takyon on Sunday June 12 2016, @06:00PM   Printer-friendly

A suspected Islamic terrorist opened fire at a gay nightclub in Florida, killing 50 people and wounding another 53 before he was killed by police. While authorities continue to investigate to determine whether this man had ties to ISIS, the terror organization has not been quiet in praising the attack. This comes three days after ISIS announced they would attack somewhere in Florida. Today's attack marks the largest act of terrorism on US soil since 9/11.

takyon: The gunman reportedly called 911 emergency services to pledge allegiance to ISIS. The President will hold a briefing momentarily. Compare this article to the original submission.


Original Submission   Late submission by physicsmajor

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Sunday June 12 2016, @10:26PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday June 12 2016, @10:26PM (#358922) Journal

    Takyon felt obligated to point out the edit to this story by adding "Compare this article to the original submission." That too seems out of character and somewhat suspect.

    Fuck off. I removed (censored) the inflammatory comment from view, and pointed out where the submitter's original phrasing could be found. There is nothing wrong with this.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday June 13 2016, @06:46AM

    by frojack (1554) on Monday June 13 2016, @06:46AM (#359203) Journal

    Apparently you aren't alone in the censoring.

    Even Obama agrees with you. [nypost.com]

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 13 2016, @07:00AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 13 2016, @07:00AM (#359206) Journal

      The President is going to wait more than 24 hours to allow investigation before laying definitive blame on ISIS? He didn't get into the specifics during a 5 minute press briefing? How #Sad!

      He called it a terror attack, he said it was "an attack on all of us", a phrase the NY Post writer used. What more do you want?

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Monday June 13 2016, @05:02PM

        by frojack (1554) on Monday June 13 2016, @05:02PM (#359448) Journal

        By the time he made his announcement, the terrorist already had been identified, his file found in the FBI Data base, which also documented his two trips to Saudi Arabia, his connections to a radical imam, and people had come forth with tales of his work place rages. Everything else except these rages were in the FBI files. Check the time lines on the stories. Even the FBI released information more damning well before Obama spole.

        But is that who Obama blamed? US.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by janrinok on Monday June 13 2016, @08:01AM

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 13 2016, @08:01AM (#359238) Journal

      We are not censoring - in fact, we are even bringing the original submission to your attention so that you can read it.

      However, the purpose of the story as published is to give the facts and details of the news. The place for comments, including political views or inflammatory remarks, is in the comments. While we do permit a small amount of leeway in this regard, as a matter of policy (and it is our policy, not the whim of a single editor) we try to separate the facts from opinions and publish the former, unless the formatting of the submission makes it very clear that they are the submitter's personal views. In this case, there was no clear formatting in the submission and therefor some irrelevant text was edited out of the published story, and new information which was not available at the time of the submission was added. Takyon was quite correct in bringing this fact to your attention so that you can read the original sub if you so wish to do.