Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Breaking News
posted by janrinok on Friday February 03 2017, @11:10AM   Printer-friendly
From BBC Television News:

An attack has occurred this morning when an individual carrying 2 backpacks and possibly weapons approached the Louvre in Paris and was engaged by a soldier who fired 5 shots. The assailant was wounded, as was a soldier during the attack. One report claims that the attacker shouted Islamic slogans during the attack.

1111GMT: A second possible assailant has been arrested. The French Govt have confirmed it is a terrorist attack.

1117GMT: It is confirmed that the first assailant attacked a soldier with a machete before being engaged and wounded.

1215GMT: Latest TV statements. The first assailant attacked a security officer and/or soldier with a machete causing wounds to his arm and face, while shouting "Allahu Akbar". A second soldier then engaged the assailant with rifle fire resulting in the assailant being seriously wounded in the stomach. The first assailant was carrying 2 backpacks but no explosives have been found in them. A search of the area is continuing. A second assailant has been arrested within the last hour a short distance away from the scene of the attack.

The Louvre Museum and the area around it is in lock-down, and the public and local workers are been evacuated from the area. The French Govt are releasing only statements that they can verify and are refusing to speculate any further during media questioning.

takyon: French soldier shoots attacker outside Louvre
Assailant Near Louvre Is Shot by French Soldier
Machete attack on soldier near Louvre was of 'terrorist nature'

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by janrinok on Friday February 03 2017, @03:17PM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 03 2017, @03:17PM (#462407) Journal

    Reducing oneself to their level doesn't seem like something we should be aiming for.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Friday February 03 2017, @03:27PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 03 2017, @03:27PM (#462414) Homepage Journal

    Not exactly reducing ourselves to their level. To a terrorist, you and I are important people. He needs us to make a statement, he needs us as his ticket into paradise, he needs us to convert, he needs us to justify his existence.

    We don't need him. We swat him like the shit eating insect that he is, and let him lie where he falls.

    Unless, of course, he falls near our food or our water - then we sweep him out of the way, can get on with our lives.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by janrinok on Friday February 03 2017, @04:00PM

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 03 2017, @04:00PM (#462451) Journal

      I aspire to being better than that, although I accept that I might fail always to do so. I have no sympathy for terrorists, but I refuse to lower myself to treat anyone other than expected under the law.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Friday February 03 2017, @06:44PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday February 03 2017, @06:44PM (#462529) Journal

      Not exactly reducing ourselves to their level.
       
      Correct. It would put us at a lower level. Eliminating due process while proclaiming our love of freedom would also add a healthy dose of hypocrisy to the bill.

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by charon on Friday February 03 2017, @07:29PM

      by charon (5660) on Friday February 03 2017, @07:29PM (#462547) Journal

      William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!

      Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

      William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!

      Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!

      From A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolt.