Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Breaking News
posted by martyb on Thursday September 14 2017, @11:45PM   Printer-friendly

The BBC is reporting that North Korea has fired another missile:

North Korea has fired a missile eastwards from its capital, Pyongyang, towards Japan, media reports say.

Japan said that the missile likely passed over its territory and has warned residents to take shelter, local media report.

South Korea and the US are analysing the details of the launch, the South's military said.

Al Jazeera reports:

The projectile was launched at 6:57am (21:57GMT Thursday) and flew over the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido before falling into the Pacific Ocean - 2,000km east of Cape Erimo, said Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga.

"Japan protests the latest launch in the strongest terms and will take appropriate and timely action at the United Nations and elsewhere, staying in close contact with the United States and South Korea," Suga told reporters.

South Korea's defence ministry said the missile travelled about 3,700km and reached a maximum altitude of 770km - both higher and further than previous tests.

Just more saber rattling? Another step in escalation? What's next?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @05:34AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @05:34AM (#568306)

    Here [youtube.com] is what happened to Gaddafi in Clinton's words.

    What you're saying is not really well supported. The historical record in Libya is not ambiguous. This [wikipedia.org] provides a reasonable synopsis while leaving out much of the detail. The people that killed Gaddafi were being armed, trained, and assisted by foreign nations. And in a couple of decades when it's declassified you can rest assured were also directly providing and instigating said people via the CIA. The whole thing would be like if e.g. China decided to start arming, training, and supporting either the alt-left or alt-right in the United States today - and then claiming their resultant destruction was an act "of the people." Hardly.

    The worst part is that Gaddafi's biggest crime had nothing to do with human rights violations. Consider the fact that one of our biggest allies is Saudi Arabia, who is now almost as a tongue in cheek joke also heading the UN Human Rights Council. All while they execute [wikipedia.org] people for things ranging from socery, to political protest, to adultery. Oh and the methods are great too. Beheading, stoning, they're even bringing back crucifixion! They like to party like its 99BCE. I imagine they all raise a glass (of grape juice... of course) to human rights following a nice crucifixion. The United States (and most other nations) could not care less about international human rights violations whatsoever except as a convenient cassus belli. Gaddafi's grievous crime was aiming to sell his country's oil in a currency other than the USD, and planning to create a gold backed currency. The petro dollar is what stabilizes the US economy. Other countries that have also stated intentions to move off the petro dollar include Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And no - it was in retribution, it was before they became targets #1 for "regime change." Saudi Arabia though, they love that petro dollar. Go figure.

    For some predictive power, Venezuela also just formally announced they also plan to move off the petro dollar. Expect to see the "rebels" in that nation suddenly seem vastly more well trained, supported, armed, and organized. I wish I could live for a thousand years just to see how history will record our little empire's actions. We aren't necessarily the "bad guys", but we're certainly not the "good guys" we feign to be. Well maybe one won't have to live to a thousand to see the end of this story.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +5  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=2, Informative=2, Total=5
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @07:33PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @07:33PM (#568651)

    We aren't necessarily the "bad guys", but we're certainly not the "good guys" we feign to be.

    Actually the USA are the bad guys. The Russians are bad but they aren't even as bad as the USA since they aren't huge hypocrites and they don't do as much regime changing as the USA does.

    And when they do it actually makes a lot more sense from their point of view. Like Ukraine - it's a buffer for them: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/10/russia-geography-ukraine-syria/413248/ [theatlantic.com]

    Whereas the USA has often made the world a worse place even for themselves with their meddling.

    On a related note, I personally find it hard to list down the good things the CIA have done for the USA much less the world.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @10:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @10:44PM (#568728)

      In my laptop, I used to use one of their WiFi cards.