SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
A gunman fired upon thousands of people attending a music festival on the Las Vegas Strip Sunday night, in a brutal attack that is blamed for at least 58 deaths, police say. In the mass shooting and panic that ensued, 515 people were injured. At least one of the dead is an off-duty police officer who was attending the concert.
Editorializing: Interesting how media always emphasize ISLAMIC terrorists, but downplay domestic terrorism as psychologically disturbed individual lone-wolfs.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Over 50 dead in mass shooting in Las Vegas
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 442 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
You are a fluke of the universe; you have no right to be here.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Monday October 02 2017, @09:39PM (3 children)
Yes, you missed, Cleo.
A one word answer to your question would be "tribalism". But, you will refuse to understand that. There are no "nations" in the mideast, as we understand nations. Pretty much everyone gives their loyalty first to their tribe, then to some leader that the tribe supports. Syrians don't support "Syria". They are tribal, and the "nation" of "Syria" is pretty much nonsense to them. That concept was pushed up on them by England, and the rest of the colonizing nations.
But, you won't accept that so try this:
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/09/americas-strategy-failing-world-complex-use-enemy-enemy-friend-strategy.html [washingtonsblog.com]
The ancient idea that “The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend” is widely attributed to the Arabs. But it is actually much older … It originated in the 4th century B.C. in India. Kautilya – the “Indian Machiavelli” – wrote about the idea in the Sanskrit military book, the Arthashastra.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/iraq-enemy-my-enemy-not-my-friend [csis.org]
The proverb that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend” is not an Arab proverb, it is a Sanskrit proverb that predates the Prophet Muhammad by roughly 1,000 years. It is also a proverb with a dismal history in practice. In case after case, the “enemy of my enemy” has actually proven to have been an enemy at the time or turned into one in the future. The Mongols did not save Europe from the Turks, and the Soviet Union was scarcely an ally after the end of World War II.
____________________________________
Recent history has proven that whenever we believe that the enemy of our enemy is our friend, we make fools of ourselves. Time and time again, our "friends" have turned against us. Let's stop being fools, and stop believing that everyone who fights against Tyrant X must be friends. We are not. At BEST, we are merely allies, until such time as it becomes invonvenient to remain allies. At worst, our ally is secretly plotting with others to kill us as soon as our usefulness has ended.
Only the naive can possibly believe that everyone who resists North Korea are all members of one big happy family.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 03 2017, @04:25AM (2 children)
The Turks weren't enemies of European powers at the time of the Mongolian invasions. In fact, a fair portion of the Mongolian army were recruited/drafted proto-Turks (anyone who could ride and handle a bow in the saddle was guaranteed to become part of the Mongolian army, as I understand it). A better example are the rebellions that happened after Attila the Hun died in 453 AD. Some of the victors and their subsequent descendants were nasty pieces [wikipedia.org] of work.
But the thing to remember here is that even when you know someone will be in future conflict with you, it can still make sense to ally in a present conflict. The Second World War is a good example of that. Fighting the USSR at the same time as Nazi Germany would have been folly for the US and UK to do. Plus, it would have brought the risk that the USSR allies with Nazi Germany (using the same enemies of enemies strategy) to defeat the US/UK Commonwealth alliance. We certainly did not make fools out of ourselves by defeating the worse evil first.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday October 03 2017, @01:56PM (1 child)
Key word, though, in your post, is "alliance". Not "friends", but "allies". We were allied with Communist Russia, or the Soviet. We were never "friends" of the Soviet. They never believed that to be so, nor did we. We were, clearly, just allied, for the purpose of defeating a common enemy.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 03 2017, @08:37PM