Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Breaking News
posted by takyon on Monday November 06 2017, @02:25AM   Printer-friendly
At Least 26 Dead After Gunman Opens Fire In South Texas Church

Federal authorities are responding to a shooting at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, a small community southeast of San Antonio.

In a press conference Sunday night, an official from the Texas Department of Public Safety described the scene: Around 11:20 am, the suspect, dressed in black, approached the church and began firing an assault rifle. He then entered the church and continued firing.

Gov. Greg Abbott confirmed that at least 26 people were killed. A Texas Department of Public Safety official said the ages of the victims ranged from 5 to 72 years old. The AP reports that the pastor's 14-year-old daughter is among the dead.

The Department of Public Safety confirmed to NPR that at least 20 others were wounded. A DPS official said in the press conference that the gunman was confronted by an armed civilian outside of the church.

The shooter, who was found dead in neighboring Guadalupe County, has been identified as Devin Kelley, 26, a former Air Force member.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by julian on Monday November 06 2017, @04:36AM (6 children)

    by julian (6003) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 06 2017, @04:36AM (#592851)

    So what you're saying is, even with our current gun regulations he was still able to get a deadly weapon and we need to make these restrictions even tighter.

    Thanks for signing off on gun control.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 06 2017, @05:35AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 06 2017, @05:35AM (#592877)

    Thanks to drug control, we have no drug abusers. Tight restrictions saved the day.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 06 2017, @05:36AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 06 2017, @05:36AM (#592878)

    Yeah, like we did with drugs! I mean we some brutal drug laws and have even sentenced nonviolent offenders to life imprisonment, have spent trillions of dollars tacking them down, and also have the largest per capita imprisonment rate in the entire world almost entirely due to nonviolent drug offense. All that's kind of bad.. but the drugs are gone, right.. right? ....

    Yeah, drugs aren't guns. It's harder to ban a weed than a weapon (though many of the drugs consumed today require extensive expertise and chemical knowledge to prepare) but ultimately you're unlikely to ever be able to ban guns in the US. There are already more guns than people. If you somehow magically managed to confiscate all of them they still regularly funnel in from our borders. And even if you managed to stop that it's increasingly simple to literally build a gun. And then even if you decide to ban all 3D printing, all access to knowledge of metalsmithing, and so on (because these are totally reasonable things to do...) then people would just jump in a car and kill people that way. Or blow them up with explosives. Or poison them. Or any of a million different possibilities.

    Ultimately the increase in apparent violence in the US is not being driven by anything other than a breakdown of mental health and increasing radicalism on all sides. The one thing that's true is that the main way a major act of violence is ended is a 'good guy' putting a bullet in the 'bad guy.' If we had even harsher gun control it's entirely possible this rampage could have been much much worse. He had ballistic armor and was carrying out this massacre in a town of 600. Had it not been for the armed civilian, it's entirely possible he could have entirely wiped out every individual in that church and then continued outward before special forces finally arrived.

  • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Monday November 06 2017, @05:36AM

    by t-3 (4907) on Monday November 06 2017, @05:36AM (#592879)

    Has drug prohibition, or the earlier prohibition of alcohol taught you nothing? The more you attempt to control goods with the law, the more you promote the growth of black markets and illegal activity. I'm a felon, if I wanted to go buy a gun, it would be very easy to do so illegally, and that WILL NOT CHANGE NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO. As long as guns (or weapons in general) are made in the world, there will a market for them and people willing to pay any price to get them. Moreover, at this point in time, with the advent of cheap CNC machines, controlling the manufacture and distribution of firearms is impossible. If you want people to stop shooting people, keep wishing, it will never happen. Society, culture, and instinct promote violence, whether the motives are social, political, racial, gang, money, control, etc. We certainly could do better though. Stop promoting violence as a solution, stop promoting the capacity to inflict violence as a necessity, stop basing the construction of society upon violence, teach people to be self-aware and recognize and control their animal urges. This will never happen though.

  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday November 06 2017, @09:42AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday November 06 2017, @09:42AM (#592954) Journal
    Restrictions on gun ownership are increasingly becoming like restrictions on encryption. Britain managed to phase out gun ownership about a hundred years ago, and it worked well because the equipment needed by a gunsmith was expensive and easy to track. If you made an unregistered gun and it was used in a crime, you had some legal liability. Gun smuggling was still an issue, but gun ownership among criminals didn't take off (guns were expensive before then, and the most common firearm anyone owned was their old service revolver from the first world war). Now, a typical Makerspace has the equipment required to mill a rifled barrel and the costs of this equipment will only drop from here. How do you regulate gun ownership in a world where a $1000 fabricator, found in most middle-class homes, can build all of the parts for one from blueprints on the Internet?
    --
    sudo mod me up