SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Update: Launch seems to have been successful. The two side boosters landed nearly simultaneously. Footage from the drone ship was cut off. The car made it into space; but the third stage will need to coast through the Van Allen radiation belts for around six hours before it makes the final burn for trans-Mars injection.
Update 2: The middle booster of SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket failed to land on its drone ship
Falcon Heavy Post-Launch Media Briefing - Megathread
SpaceX's newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, is set to be launched at around 1:30 PM EST (6:30 PM UTC) today. The launch window extends to 4:00 PM EST (9:00 PM UTC).
SpaceX will attempt to recover all three boosters during the launch. The two previously-flown side boosters will attempt to land nearly simultaneously at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station's Landing Zones 1 and 2. The center core will attempt to land on a drone barge hundreds of miles off the coast of Florida.
The dummy payload for the Falcon Heavy is Elon Musk's personal 2008 Tesla Roadster. It is carrying a mannequin wearing SpaceX's space suit flight suit that will be used when the company begins to send astronauts to the International Space Station. The car will be launched into a heliocentric orbit that will bring it close to Mars (and back near Earth) periodically, and is equipped with three cameras. Its stereo system will be playing David Bowie's Space Oddity.
If the launch is successful, the Falcon Heavy could be flown within the next 3 to 6 months for a customer such as the U.S. Air Force, Arabsat, Inmarsat, or ViaSat.
Falcon Heavy will be capable of launching 63,800 kg to low-Earth orbit (LEO), 26,700 kg to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO), 16,800 kg to Mars, or 3,500 kg to Pluto (New Horizons was 478 kg). It will supplant the Delta IV Heavy, which is capable of launching 28,790 kg to LEO or 14,220 kg to GTO. Space Launch System Block 1 will be capable of launching 70,000 kg to LEO (Block 1B: 105,000 kg to LEO, Block 2: 130,000 kg to LEO).
Musk has suggested that an additional two side boosters could be added to Falcon Heavy (perpendicularly?) to make a "Falcon Super Heavy" with even more thrust. This may not happen if SpaceX decides to focus on the BFR instead, which as planned would be able to launch 150,000 kg to LEO while being fully reusable and potentially cheaper than the Falcon 9 (or capable of launching 250,000 kg to LEO in expendable mode).
The webcast can be seen here or directly on YouTube.
- BBC: Elon Musk's huge Falcon Heavy rocket set for launch
- CNN: SpaceX Falcon Heavy: Everything you need to know
- Bloomberg: Musk Sets a Low Bar for SpaceX Launch
- Space.com: Is the Tesla Roadster Flying on the Falcon Heavy's Maiden Flight Just Space Junk?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @01:38PM (10 children)
Why send boring concrete when you can send a car! I love it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:02PM (2 children)
Yeah, if you've got F-you money like Musk, why not do it occasionally.
Assuming the cameras and stereo are running off the original Roadster battery pack, how long will they stay on?
(Score: 5, Funny) by DannyB on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:43PM
In space, no one can hear your car stereo.
Don't put a mindless tool of corporations in the white house; vote ChatGPT for 2024!
(Score: 2) by moondrake on Wednesday February 07 2018, @05:29PM
I think I heard him say "about 12 hours" in the press conference.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @05:43PM (3 children)
I would have sent a Yugo.
(Score: 5, Funny) by bob_super on Tuesday February 06 2018, @05:48PM (1 child)
Should Aliens encounter the car is the middle of nowhere, would you like them to think we have decent taste, or is it preferable to have the plausible deniability that we wouldn't target them with such an ugly thing as a Yugo?
There are tradeoffs, for sure.
Musk chose to have the fun of claiming his company built the fastest car anywhere.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:36PM
A somewhat more creative dilemma would be do we launch a life size statue of jar jar binks, or a really nicely painted army of warhammer 40K minis?
Whats a bigger war crime, "It would be a shame if our Necron army awoke on your planet..." vs "let me give you the good news of our lord and savior jar jar binks" I would definitely drive my car to Mars orbit to avoid that trial, either way.
(Score: 2) by Osamabobama on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:21PM
Yugos are not safe!
(Granted, it's an unmanned mission, but it's best to start off with a good safety culture.)
Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
(Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:15PM
Though he could send Boring [boringcompany.com] concrete if he wanted to.
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 5, Funny) by richtopia on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:23PM (1 child)
Watch out: the documentary Heavy Metal prophesized a Corvette bringing the evil Loc-Nar to earth:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_Metal_(film) [wikipedia.org]
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhistoriasdelmetaverso.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fheavy1.jpg&f=1 [duckduckgo.com]
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:25PM
it's perfectly clear it's already here. Stock market dropped 666 points the other day.
(Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @01:42PM
The Verge says the Falcon Heavy launch to carry two paying customers around the Moon is likely cancelled in favor of using the BFR. They're not too clear about it though. Does the rocket even need to get approved for human spaceflight in the case of private passengers?
SpaceX will demonstrate a new direct-to-GEO [wikipedia.org] capability for the USAF with this launch:
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @01:49PM (6 children)
is a nice name for a rocket
(Score: 3, Funny) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:13PM (5 children)
Yeah, those guys rocked hard back in the 70s. The only surviving member, Jethro Scudbucket, is still touring at the age of 76 and, since his hip replacement surgery in 2015, has even resumed his legendary "self-immolation stage dive" stunt at every gig.
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:18PM (4 children)
They were awesome! Their amps went to 12!
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:34PM (3 children)
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Wednesday February 07 2018, @04:43AM
That and I'll sell you oxygen-free cable too. Because it sounds better.
BTW, there are guitar amp brands that go to 11 and 12. Kind of like launching your beautiful red roadster into solar orbit. Because why not.
(Score: 2) by kazzie on Wednesday February 07 2018, @09:17AM (1 child)
https://www.xkcd.com/670/ [xkcd.com]
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday February 07 2018, @11:16AM
(Score: 2) by Virindi on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:05PM (4 children)
I don't think it will actually be able to play anything if it is not pressurized :)
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:12PM (1 child)
You could probably hear it if you put your ear directly on the car. But you would freeze.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:20PM
No, not exactly. Only the ear will.
(retiring to sleep quarters, not before nodding in recognition to Vincent)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:47PM
(And yes, I know I suggested Don Felder's /Takin' a Ride/ the other day, but that's because it's a way better song - it's the visuals that are a better match this time.)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Thursday February 08 2018, @04:17PM
Why not? There's no claim that anybody can actually hear it.
Unless the audio system hardware relies on being in an atmosphere to function somehow.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:15PM (7 children)
Comparison term - ISS mass in 2016: 419,725 kg [nasa.gov] - so 3 LEO trips with the same rocket will be enough to put an ISS-worth of mass on LEO.
Took ISS 13 years (between 1998 and 2011).
100 tons difference between uncontrolled reentry and total recovery of the launch vehicle ... mmm, need to check that (launches Kerbal Space Program)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:49PM (1 child)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:29PM
Apologies for not being versed in the subtleties of English language during (and after) a sleepless night.
Other than that... I may be tempted to invoke the excuse of SpaceX being the (one and only) Musk enterprise that manages to hit the targets they announce, thus the conditional future has credible chances to actually happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 4, Interesting) by VLM on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:15PM (4 children)
Yeah well, you'll be shocked, shocked to hear that booster mfgr always give ridiculous specs for "LEO" such as "with a hurricane acting as a tailwind at launch time". More seriously, the famous example of the Saturn5 is claimed even on wikipedia as 140,000 Kg to 90 mile orbit, well, lets be realistic, unless you're a bar of tungsten you're re-entering pretty soon at that low of an altitude. Also the 5 was spec'd at Florida inclination about 30 degrees.
Comparing apples to apples I'm not what the corrected figures are for the 63,800 falcon because I'm too lazy to run the math. I'm sure theres some marketing bastard out there spec'ing LEO orbits to a mere 80 miles altitude, heck if all you're trying to do is reach Hawaii from North Korea suborbital, that's more than good enough. Like some dude said in Korean, we aim for Mars Orbit but keep almost hitting Hawaii. Somewhat more seriously, you're not gonna like the crazy ISS orbit the Russians demanded which averages in the low 200 mile range (lets say 250) and inclination of about 52 degrees.
I'm too lazy to look up the Chilton manual (LOL) for the Falcon Heavy but I'm gonna guess spacex marketing didn't spec LEO as the whacked out inclination and altitude of the ISS, but probably not as wimpy as the Sat5 spec.
A bad automotive analogy would be something like advertising a car as great for cross country USA road trips while not mentioning the marketing definition of cross country is Seattle to LA vs National Lampoon's definition of cross country was something like NYC to San Fran, so, you know, a couple percent difference here and there.
I guess in summary I'm saying "yeah maybe 4 or 5 trips thank you marketing department but you are more or less correct in that it'll be a rather small integer"
A geosynchronous space station would be interesting. Imagine com-sat-ing the hell out of a geosync human staffed space station, cover that darn thing with narrow bean transponders. It has all the advantages of prepping for solar flare proof interplanetary (interstellar?) generation-ships along with the bonus that if you totally F up a lifeboat can re-enter and land in less than an hour (depending on how much fuel you're willing to burn in the lifeboat)
(Score: 4, Informative) by c0lo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:09PM (3 children)
Oh, yeah, for some values of "interesting".
One of these values being the following interesting trivia "Did you know the geosync orbit is 35,786 km altitude, in the outer part of the Van Allen Radiation Belt? That's where the high energy (0.1-10MeV) electrons [wikipedia.org] are playing".
A Bremsstrahlung [wikipedia.org] in the X-Ray spectrum for cascading collisions (most probable) or gamma radiation if the electron is stopped in a single collision.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by deimtee on Wednesday February 07 2018, @09:03AM (1 child)
The van allen belt ions are only a problem because the ones that miss you get to go round again. There isn't actually that much in them, and there are serious proposals to actually drain them if we get heavily into space industry.
If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @09:19PM
I've wondered whether the belts contribute energy to the earth's magnetic field, if so then draining them could be long term catastrophic.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:00PM
I agree the environment isn't as nice as LEO, but bug, feature, whats the difference. I was kinda into the idea of "We're gonna have to make heavily shielded interplanetary shuttles sooner or later, so may as well start by experimenting with them in comfortable close-to-earth geosync orbit"
In science fiction they usually handle it by everyone goes into a multi layer vault of lead sheet and the main water tank when there's a bad solar flare. Day to day exposure, ... low level chemo drugs in the food?
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:16PM (13 children)
http://www.businessinsider.com/falcon-heavy-elon-musk-what-spacex-launch-means-for-competitors-2018-2 [businessinsider.com]
The world needs to continue development of diverse launch systems, especially in the heavy class. Just because one system takes a step ahead in efficiency for a couple of years isn't a reason to immediately terminate all competing programs.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:40PM (11 children)
I wouldn't worry about that one iota. United Launch Alliance will always have a seat at the table because the U.S. Air Force wants redundant capabilities, and because Congressmen like pork. We'll be extremely lucky if even the SLS pork rocket gets cancelled.
As for the world, countries like China will want to develop their own reusable rocket [atimes.com] capabilities [futurism.com] to ensure they can launch military payloads. I'd expect the same from India, which already launches cheap rockets [wikipedia.org]. In fact, once it becomes clear what needs to be copied from SpaceX, expect nearly all launch providers to attempt rocket landings.
SpaceX with reusable BFRs is most likely to hurt smaller private companies like Blue Origin and Rocket Lab that don't have the proven capabilities or pork connections that ULA has. Arianespace could be hurt since EU nations fund it and are wary of dumping too much of their own money into a noncompetitive rocket that hasn't flown yet (Ariane 6 [wikipedia.org]). I'm more optimistic about Virgin Galactic and Reaction Engines Limited (Skylon [wikipedia.org]) which are more focused on space tourism and spaceplanes. Rockets are great and the BFR would be the best thing since sliced bread, but casual tourists don't need to go much further than LEO and we want Star Wars style single-stage-to-orbit vehicles (which could also be reusable and very cheap in $/kg).
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 5, Funny) by Freeman on Tuesday February 06 2018, @05:15PM (1 child)
Watch out for India though, I hear they can be a bit aggressive. https://www.geek.com/games/why-gandhi-is-always-a-warmongering-jerk-in-civilization-1608515/ [geek.com]
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2) by EvilSS on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:11PM
(Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:18PM (4 children)
And
I know the air force wants big rockets, but they should be the ones flirting with the Virgin.
With a little work, and lots of money, a scaled up Virgin could be runway to orbit in less than 30 minutes, and put spy satellites into any orbit you'd want.
Runway to orbit makes more sense than keeping a rocket fueled and on hold for weeks.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:32PM
That ain't how it works.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:29PM (2 children)
Only 30 minutes, eh? Whatever. Just wear protection, wrap up that docking port. In the movies its cool when the orbital assembly structure squirts out a starship after months of growth, but in reality its a lot of work and starship captains traditionally (at least in fiction) require a lot of babysitting and oversight or else they run off the rails ("Young man, if all your friends broke the prime directive, would you break the prime directive too? And while you're at it, get off my space-grass lawn.")
MAIDEN flights, VIRGIN galactic, what is with all this aerospace slut-shaming? A girl should be able to rendezvous at any universal docking port she consents to verbally and in writing.
(Score: 1) by jelizondo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:33PM (1 child)
Given the current state of affairs, it should be in writing and with at least two witnesses :-/
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:32PM
A rocket needs to be able to launch to a station, receive a payload, land back on earth, and only then if it so chooses decide the payload received was done so without consent.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:00PM (3 children)
How many casual tourists can a single BFR
roastferry to LEO at one time?🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:29PM (2 children)
Probably several hundred people, vs. just 100 for a journey to Mars.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elon-musk-bfr-travel_us_59cddc0ae4b05f005d33550a [huffingtonpost.com]
Much less cargo for a manned mission only going to LEO instead of Mars.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:08AM (1 child)
That sounds like the basis of a practical bubble hotel, 72 hours on-orbit for $50K/head?
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/10/spacex-bfr-to-be-lower-cost-than-falcon-1-at-7-million-per-launch.html [nextbigfuture.com]
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @05:37PM
all I am saying is that for $50k, that virginal maiden better give great head.
wait what do you mean that's not what you meant? i wanted to be part of the totally high club, but nooo
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:48PM
It will only be a monoculture if SpaceX's fat competitors don't get more lean and mean. They are not hungry and driven like a real business should be. They are too reliant on the government teat to always be there. Too dependent on being in bed with congress critters rather than innovating.
I'm not saying the worker bees are not good innovators. But they work for companies that have a dysfunction in how they operate. It might have made sense in the 1970's. But over time things have changed.
Don't put a mindless tool of corporations in the white house; vote ChatGPT for 2024!
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:31PM (2 children)
delayed to 2:20 PM EST
https://twitter.com/SpaceX [twitter.com]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:53PM (1 child)
Delayed to 3:45 PM EST.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:56PM
Seems to be going forward, launch webcast to start at 3:25 PM EST.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:31PM (4 children)
It looks like a penis and balls.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:38PM
230 foot
talllong[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 3, Informative) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:30PM
Well, then, we'll just have the classic Austin Powers joke [youtube.com].
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by jelizondo on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:06PM (1 child)
There is an old saying: "He who is hungry, is always thinking of bread"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:13PM
don't tell my wife and daughter
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:42PM (4 children)
I'll predict 2 boosters land properly, and 1 crash lands.
2 minutes, 45 seconds to launch!
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2, Informative) by KilroySmith on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:31AM (1 child)
>> 2 minutes, 45 seconds to launch!
Not according to the timestamp on your post!
(Score: 2) by KilroySmith on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:35AM
Sorry, misread your post - thought you wrote "Two hours..." instead of "Two minutes..."
(Score: 2) by KilroySmith on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:34AM (1 child)
Congratulations!
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:49AM
Elon's loss is my gain! (not rly)
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @08:57PM (21 children)
Everything seems to have gone very smoothly. The boosters landed properly, and the first stage was headed to the right place when signal was lost. Good job, all involved!
The "DON'T PANIC" sign on the dashboard of the payload car was a nice touch.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:19PM (18 children)
The webcast went split screen four screens and the bottom two showed the same feed if you watched carefully whereas I'm sure the intention was left would be left and right would be right. A pity. The synchronized landing was insanely cool.
The coverage of the launch was nice, very unlike American sports coverage. If they covered it like American Sports we'd have to listen to 40 minutes of human interest how the janitor overcame dyslexia, then 19 minutes of commercials, and a mere 1 minute of launch.
When I saw the video of the car and the synchronized landing I'm thinking this is probably at least 50% going to be a TV commercial for the car. Just a few days difference and this could have been a superbowel commercial.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:22PM (13 children)
If you watched and listened even more carefully, you'd find that it was not the same feed (the commentary even addressed this). They looked very similar because they are basically identical and were almost in the same location/angle as well. Hence the simultaneous landing.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2, Informative) by nitehawk214 on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:35PM (4 children)
I think it was the same feed. Both screens seem to show the same landing pad.
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=2273 [youtu.be]
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 3, Disagree) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:06PM (3 children)
They are not the same feed. As demonstrated by your own link - they're jostling differently, and angled differently.
I'm guessing they behaved basically identically because they were programmed to behave identically.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by wonkey_monkey on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:26PM
It is the same feed, unless you think the rockets are programmed to produce identical flames. One image is very slightly delayed compared to the other, so they sometimes don't show the same frame, but they usually do.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by moondrake on Wednesday February 07 2018, @05:44PM
they were the same in the life stream.
It has been corrected since.
(Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday February 07 2018, @07:13PM
One of the landing pads is painted differently: http://cdn.cnngreece.gr/media/com_news/galleries/2018/02/07/6058/photos/full/2018-02-07T034016Z_530788455_RC12F0A52690_RTRMADP_3_SPACE-SPACEX-HEAVY.JPG [cnngreece.gr]
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:44PM (2 children)
I heard them say that too, but watching closely it looked like one could see the other fire up right before touchdown, but the other showed the same flame. So I'm not sure what that flame was, or if they both showed whichever was slightly behind.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:49PM (1 child)
I concur with AC, early in the coverage it was creepy that the maneuvering thruster firings and views were utterly identical even apparently digital artifacts looked the same to me; perhaps if the remaining fuel was identical deep in the decimal places, but I donno. Yet later on near the landing the picture quality changed a lot and they looked like two separate feeds.
I think they accidentally aired two displays of left or right and someone in the production crew fixed it before the landing.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:28PM
It's the same feed with one side occasionally showing a slight delay.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:33PM (4 children)
Commentators can be mistaken. It was the same feed. The boosters are not so similar that they produce identical flames.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:18PM (3 children)
Let's see the proof.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:04AM (2 children)
Just rewatch the video and use your eyes instead of listening to the commentators.
I mean there's this bit here:
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=1979 [youtu.be]
or this bit:
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=1882 [youtu.be]
or this:
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=2151 [youtu.be]
or this:
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=2273 [youtu.be]
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:15AM (1 child)
What about all the frames that don't match?
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:26PM
What about all the frames that do?
The two views of the stream, which seem to run at about 10fps, are slightly out of sync.
They've now released a corrected video with both booster views:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc16uozHVE [youtube.com]
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by terryk30 on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:25PM
Seconded. That may have been the f-most coolest tech thing I've ever seen.
Made me wonder if they had to upgrade those things to watch out for each other... (Or maybe at separation they're practically guaranteed to also separate enough from each other that this isn't a practical concern?)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:45AM (1 child)
WOO! YEAH!
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP!!!!!!
RAAAAAAAHRRRRRRROOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAHWOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YYYEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
HHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:57AM
U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:28PM
They've released a corrected video showing views from both boosters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc16uozHVE [youtube.com]
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:20PM
I'm about done updating the story. It will cruise through the Van Allen belts for hours before doing a final burn.
Still don't know what happened to the center core that attempted landing on the drone barge.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:22PM
I usually don't catch these live, but today I made sure to set aside some time. Very exciting and also moving to see the humans making progress.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by khallow on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:30PM (9 children)
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday February 06 2018, @09:57PM (3 children)
Congrats to SpaceX on a great launch... how long before we get solid news about the central booster's fate on the Drone ship?
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:37PM
Haven't seen anything about it yet:
https://twitter.com/spacex [twitter.com]
https://twitter.com/elonmusk [twitter.com]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:13AM
Sources tell The Verge the center core failed to land on the drone ship. Updated in summary.
Looks like I called it! [soylentnews.org]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:26AM
On a press conference live stream, Musk said that it hit the water at around 300 mph/500 kph, 100 meters away from the ship. But that the information could be incorrect. But it's pretty much confirmed as DEAD.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Tuesday February 06 2018, @10:30PM
That was the best part. I forgot what I exclaimed, but I exclaimed it out loud.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by EvilSS on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:14PM
(Score: 2) by tibman on Tuesday February 06 2018, @11:41PM
Agreed. If i had known what watching the stream was going to be like then i would have gathered my friends together in front of a big TV and drank during the launch. Amazing.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
(Score: 2) by theluggage on Wednesday February 07 2018, @12:28AM (1 child)
That shot of the two boosters landing looked like a 1970s artists impression of what 1980 was going to look like - finally come alive.
Seriously: Bono, P., Gatland, K. (1969) Frontiers of Space (p63 - S-IVB Recovery Sequence). Blandford Press, London. ISBN 0 7137 3504 X.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday February 08 2018, @06:09AM
(Score: 0, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:11AM (3 children)
10% are self aware. 100% think they are self aware. Elon has the self-awareness, empathy, intelligence, and compassion that allows him to do this. That combination is one in a billion at best. Even then, he has been divorced. The guy is worth either negative or positive $20 billion, and just doesn't care. Because he's different from you.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:50AM (1 child)
I'm not self aware of this self aware meme.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @03:31AM
It's not a meme. I talked in person about it with khallow, and MDC as well. Look at the book "Elephant in the brain" by Robin Hanson.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @03:48AM
Self-awareness is overrated. It's about what you do, not how you think of yourself.
(Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:29AM (7 children)
Say 1/3 of the boosters fail to re-land as happened today. The end-customer wouldn't be directly charged for a failure like this, but I wonder how resilient the business model is to account for such failures. Could you lose 30% of your hardware every other launch and still keep the spaceport open by being cheaper than your competition? I wonder, but in any case, the functionality and reliability of their launch - which is really what the customers directly care most about - seemed a resounding success, so I anticipate their success, at any rate.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by KilroySmith on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:37AM
If they can reuse anything, they'll be able to undercut the competition. They'll certainly have to adjust the launch cost if they lose too many boosters, but that's acceptable.
(Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @01:46AM (4 children)
In the press conference, Musk said it was more important to recover the side boosters because of the expensive titanium grid fins they had. He said that if he had the choose one to be destroyed, it would be the center core. Even though the center core of Falcon Heavy has to be custom built for Falcon Heavy (a normal Falcon 9 booster is not strong enough for the job).
I believe the current $62 million and $90 million prices for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy assume expendability. Customers could get a 10-30% discount on those prices when reusability is attempted.
Of course, this is just a test. Previously, he had said that just having the rocket explode after 20 seconds (far enough to not damage the launch pad) would be a victory. Instead, they nailed the simultaneous booster landing and scored a PR coup with "Starman" instead of the temporary excitement of a huge fireball. And now the rocket is testing direct-to-GEO capability and soon we should have an Earth-Mars cycler (the first one ever?).
BFR shouldn't have the same issues. It's just two stages, the booster and the spaceship. The booster will have the oomph to land on the ground consistently, or over the water if used near major cities for city-to-city transport. The problem that killed the Falcon Heavy center core this time was that it ran out of fuel [twitter.com]. BFR booster will have a massive amount of fuel.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by choose another one on Wednesday February 07 2018, @10:52AM (3 children)
Well, not quite. Problem was only one engine ignited out of three required, so probably not fuel but igniter (the TEA-TEB - hypergolic chemical igniter). I think fuel tank is same for all engines but ingiter supply and tankage may be separate for each engine (?) and hence it was possible for two engines to run out of igniter, or maybe there was only enough igniter to light one, or some other failure.
If there is separate igniter supply and that was the problem, then there were six other engines that could have been used instead but probably zero time in which to use them - this is the inherent risk with hover-slam, if the burn doesn't happen exactly as planned you are toast, no second chances.
Worth remembering also that the center core is the one that is _not_ a standard F9 core - I believe it is heavily modified for strength and it will be heavier too therefore. I'm sure they'll figure out what happened.
The real WTF, for me, was the "successful" final burn, which has apparently put the payload into an orbit way beyond what was planned and possibly out to Ceres. Not sure what happened there - failure to shut-off, or they just burned until fuel ran out (planned?!), or got the calculations wrong, or what. Seems a little reckless if they planned to just burn all the fuel and see where it ends up.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @06:00PM (2 children)
I haven't read anything about this yet, but if it is true I'll dump it into the next Falcon Heavy story going live in 1 hour, 54 minutes.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by choose another one on Wednesday February 07 2018, @07:46PM (1 child)
Confirmed by Musk himself here: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/961083704230674438 [twitter.com] if you want a reference, also now plenty of stuff on various news sites, I still haven't seen any explanation of _why_ it overshot though.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 07 2018, @08:02PM
It is done, new story is live.
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/02/07/1324216 [soylentnews.org]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 07 2018, @09:57AM
I believe the center stage was a test landing. The failure is listed as only one engine out of three started back up.
As far as I know, landings have been done with only one engine, except for the recent water landing that ended up floating. If I remember correctly, this means that the center stage landing was the first attempt at doing a three engine landing on a barge.