Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
Breaking News
posted by martyb on Monday December 28 2020, @07:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the Hang-in-there dept.

Many sources are reporting that Trump finally signed the pandemic relief bill:

Not gonna summarize all the bits in it - it's some 5k pages of legalese gobbledygook, but I understand it continues augmented unemployment benefits, eviction suspension, funding to prevent government shutdown, and another direct cash payment.

I'm sure it also has a bunch of "porky pork", but the people are suffering, time is of essence, and it should have been done months ago.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Wednesday December 30 2020, @12:35AM (26 children)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Wednesday December 30 2020, @12:35AM (#1092688) Journal
    Business has spent 40 years NOT investing in plants and factoriess. Rather in financial vehicles like the slice-and-dice triple-a rated securitized mortgages that were worthless.

    And the temps in Texas are now too hot in some areas to graze traditional cattle, so they're looking for genetic bloodlines that can tolerate the higher heat and lack of good grazing grounds. This was not a problem 200 years ago.

    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 30 2020, @02:18AM (25 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 30 2020, @02:18AM (#1092718) Journal

    Business has spent 40 years NOT investing in plants and factoriess.

    Except of course, when they have so invested.

    Rather in financial vehicles like the slice-and-dice triple-a rated securitized mortgages that were worthless.

    Actually, those retained a great deal of worth. The problem wasn't the alleged worthlessness of the securities. It was way overestimating the security of the securities and then massively overleveraging. There is nothing in the world that is sure enough to support the 50 to 1 (and greater) leverage (that is, borrowing $50+ for every $1 of assets you have) that was being bet on mortgage securities at that time (with behavior corresponding to that amazing lack of risk awareness such as ignoring large scale fraud).

    And the temps in Texas are now too hot in some areas to graze traditional cattle

    As I already noted, that's not new. I suspect rather that those ranchers are expanding into areas that are traditionally hostile to cattle because of the temperature, using climate change money. It'd be far from the first a perceived crisis is used as a pretext to fund an existing scheme that has little to nothing to do with the crisis.

    • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:34AM (24 children)

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:34AM (#1092744) Journal
      What tou suspect is wrong. Places where they were raising cattle in the past now need extraordinary measures to keep the Anika from overheating and dying.

      And the government bailed out the banks because so many of the properties had a negative worth. One bank tried to just give 8,000 properties to the city. The city said okay, if you pay the costs of bulldozing the homes and disconnecting the utilities. So the bank still holds the properties, they're totally worthless (gutted for wiring, plumbing, fixtures, windows and doors, full of mould, squatters, roof fallen in, fire damage. Some of these places had been flipped sight unseen by one speculator after another, $500 ballooning to $155,000 and then defaulting.

      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
      • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:37AM (15 children)

        by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:37AM (#1092746) Journal
        There's no "allegedly" in their worthlessness.

        Cities offer them for auction, nobody bids because the cost of bulldozing them and turning them into worthless vacant lots is a losers game.

        --
        SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:51AM (14 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 30 2020, @03:51AM (#1092750) Journal

          Cities offer them for auction, nobody bids because the cost of bulldozing them and turning them into worthless vacant lots is a losers game.

          I think that illustrates the problem handily. This alleged problem has nothing to do with securities. And all this real estate is less than twenty years old in good locations. It doesn't cost that much to bulldoze a house and turning it into valuable vacant lots, even if you couldn't flip the house for a profit. I suspect the "cities" of the quote are cities with substantial problems that go way beyond some overbuild of shoddy houses from the last boom. Like Detroit, for a glaring example of a city that has trouble selling homes for auction.

          • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @06:29AM (13 children)

            by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @06:29AM (#1093135) Journal

            Chicago, Baltimore, much of California's Inland Empire, which was a high growth area (drive until you can buy) with million dollar homes on brand new streets that became worthless during the recession.

            So it was both urban slums and suburban rich folk housing that was affected. That's what happens at the end of a speculative property boom when one in every 83 workers is a real estate agent flogging properties that end up being sold multiple times before the first shovel of dirt is dug.

            And banks approving no-doc mortgages where you don't even need to show a pay slip or tax return. Search for "stated income mortgage."

            Lots of fraud. People would get a mortgage based on their "stated income", then get a bogus HELOC based on an evaluation from a "cooperative" to take out cash to live on and make the payments, flip the house, and do it again. -p> This isn't that far in the past. It's all documented.

            --
            SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday December 31 2020, @12:39PM (12 children)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 31 2020, @12:39PM (#1093196) Journal

              Chicago, Baltimore, much of California's Inland Empire, which was a high growth area (drive until you can buy) with million dollar homes on brand new streets that became worthless during the recession.

              I see I nailed that problem. Deal with the urban management problem and you'll deal with the low value of property that became "worthless".

              So it was both urban slums and suburban rich folk housing that was affected.

              Except that it wasn't so.

              And banks approving no-doc mortgages where you don't even need to show a pay slip or tax return. Search for "stated income mortgage."

              Irrelevant. In a market bubble where risk blind traders can do almost anything and still make money, this is the sort of thing they do. It's not news. We'll see that again and again, each time there is such a bubble. It didn't make property worthless then or now.

              • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @08:53PM (11 children)

                by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @08:53PM (#1093406) Journal
                California Inner Empire was not urban blight. It was suburban and very much white professional yuppie land. So no, you didn't nail the problem. The problem was rampant speculation.
                --
                SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday December 31 2020, @10:03PM (10 children)

                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 31 2020, @10:03PM (#1093415) Journal

                  California Inner Empire was not urban blight.

                  Yet. A bunch of property that nobody will touch is a symptom of growing blight.

                  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @11:34PM (9 children)

                    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @11:34PM (#1093429) Journal
                    Brand now million dollar homes is not blight. But you would not know - low aspirations punk ass who never had a real job, never mind a career.
                    --
                    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @02:16AM (8 children)

                      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @02:16AM (#1093465) Journal

                      Brand now million dollar homes is not blight.

                      You just said they were negative dollar homes. Not buying the semantic shift here.

                      • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 01 2021, @04:13AM (7 children)

                        by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 01 2021, @04:13AM (#1093495) Journal
                        People invested big bucks to build entire new upper-middle class communities. Then the Great Recession hit.

                        You couldn't give them away because just the taxes exceeded the income of the suddenly jobless, and they were too far away for someone who was having a problem keeping gas in the car (or was living in their car).

                        It's all out there. But you're too needing to keep up your fake reality that you won't even search.'

                        Same as you don't know what it's like to have a real job.

                        Why don't you have some sort of career? Given up? No real qualifications? No real experience? No real interest? No talent? Too lazy? Too afraid of failure? Personality issues that make you unemployable? Periods of delusion? Constantly delusional? Too busy shit-posting? The aliens gonna get you if you go outside? If you work most of your pay will be garnisheed for debts or fines? Outstanding warrants? Electronic ankle tracking bracelet? Too gross? Tourette's?

                        Come on, there's got to be some reason your only job experience was part time at a concession stand years ago. Got caught stealing? Criminal record?

                        --
                        SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @04:55AM (6 children)

                          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @04:55AM (#1093501) Journal

                          People invested big bucks to build entire new upper-middle class communities. Then the Great Recession hit. You couldn't give them away because just the taxes exceeded the income of the suddenly jobless, and they were too far away for someone who was having a problem keeping gas in the car (or was living in their car).

                          As I've already noted, that sort of shitshow is how you kick off urban blight. There's a reason some places have this problem and others don't. And it doesn't have anything to do with too little taxes.

                          Why don't you have some sort of career? Given up? No real qualifications? No real experience? No real interest? No talent? Too lazy? Too afraid of failure? Personality issues that make you unemployable? Periods of delusion? Constantly delusional? Too busy shit-posting? The aliens gonna get you if you go outside? If you work most of your pay will be garnisheed for debts or fines? Outstanding warrants? Electronic ankle tracking bracelet? Too gross? Tourette's?

                          What's your career again? As I see it, I don't need nor want whatever you think a career is.

                          Come on, there's got to be some reason your only job experience was part time at a concession stand years ago. Got caught stealing? Criminal record?

                          I guess 11 years in hospitality accounting isn't really a job, right? At least, it pays the bills, and leaves a bit over 50% after taxes and bills for me to save.

                          • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 01 2021, @05:33AM (5 children)

                            by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 01 2021, @05:33AM (#1093510) Journal
                            Ooh, I hit a sore spot. "Hospitality accounting" my arse. You're not an accountant. Not even a bookkeeper. We've been on to you for years. What is "hospitality accounting?" Helping a small place with their quick books?

                            No wonder you don't have a clue.

                            --
                            SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @12:20PM (4 children)

                              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @12:20PM (#1093541) Journal

                              Ooh, I hit a sore spot. "Hospitality accounting" my arse. You're not an accountant. Not even a bookkeeper. We've been on to you for years. What is "hospitality accounting?" Helping a small place with their quick books?

                              I notice you don't apologize for getting it wrong. Yes, you hit the Azuma sore spot where the person just says shit about other people, and doesn't care in the slightest if what they say is right or wrong. Basically, constructs their own fantasy world and then tries to make everyone play in it.

                              Sorry, I'm not interested.

                              As to your questions, in the (non-covid) summer (this being seasonal work), the "small place" is a resort with 300 hotel rooms, 280 cabins, and 440 campsites, plus several restaurants, retail shops, and a Marina - in the middle of a park that sees more than four million visitors a year. and "hospitality accounting" just means that I do a different sort of accounting than the people who figure out what account to charge the office party cake to or strategies for minimizing tax exposure. In particular, it's a combination of auditing all sales transactions in that location plus monitoring that employees are handling money correctly.

                              No wonder you don't have a clue.

                              Because? This is a pathetic argument from authority without an authority. Last I heard, you worked in the past as a coder and now, are retired and volunteer work at a local food bank. Doesn't sound like you have the life experiences necessary to judge people based on flimsy evidence, right? Maybe you could come back to continue this argument when you do get such experience? It should only take a few decades.

                              • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 01 2021, @01:55PM (3 children)

                                by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 01 2021, @01:55PM (#1093556) Journal

                                You keep projecting.

                                Get a real job for once on your life. Seriously, a camp ground? That's like somebody saying they work on a cruise ship. In other words, unemployed.

                                It's funny. Once my vision is fixed, I'll be using my retirement pension to subsidize my software development. And I'll make money at it, because it's what I do. I should be able to do it through my 90s, in part because I'm not going to open source anything, so no nagging from freetards about features they want that I think go in the wrong direction, or competing with forks of my own crap.

                                The extra money would be nice, as would being back in the swing of things.

                                Or to quote Foghorn Leghorn - "where's your ambition, boy?"

                                --
                                SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @06:21PM (2 children)

                                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @06:21PM (#1093655) Journal

                                  You keep projecting.

                                  Get a real job for once on your life. Seriously, a camp ground? That's like somebody saying they work on a cruise ship. In other words, unemployed.

                                  Who would have thought that they would have campgrounds in the woods?

                                  Given that this is coming from the person whose present career is cat-sitter, the accusation doesn't have the sting it might otherwise have.

                                  I also find it interesting how we segued from talking about the futility of high taxation (using your own examples!) to my supposed lack of a career and insufficient ambition unbecoming of a SN hack. I guess I better drop a gill net and catch some massive red herring because the school is here.

                                  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 01 2021, @06:42PM (1 child)

                                    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 01 2021, @06:42PM (#1093660) Journal

                                    I'm retired. That's what people in their mid-60s do. I spend my weeks volunteering. You tried to give the impression you were an accountant or whatever, but your posts where you have no clue whatsoever about money say you're full of shit, like usual.

                                    Nobody believes you. Absolutely nobody.

                                    Then again, what can you expect from a hick living in Hicksville.

                                    --
                                    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                                    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @10:00PM

                                      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @10:00PM (#1093723) Journal

                                      I'm retired.

                                      Welcome fellow deadbeat. Bring the XBox and I'll bring the Cheetos and skunk beer.

                                      You tried to give the impression you were an accountant or whatever

                                      Yes, I'm an accountant and yes, I have on occasion tried to give that impression as well. So what? Have I ever argued that you should agree with me because of my authority as an accountant?

                                      but your posts where you have no clue whatsoever about money say you're full of shit, like usual.

                                      I notice those alleged posts didn't happen in this thread.

                                      So anyway, I've been thinking about why you're bringing this apparently completely unrelated thing up in a thread about increasing taxes and I got it figured out. Your problem is that Canada isn't taxing you enough - that is, you need your taxes increased just like Apple does. That's why you're a deadbeat retiree rather than a real job careerist. Here's hoping that Canada fixes that and makes bank at the same time!

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 30 2020, @04:03AM (7 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 30 2020, @04:03AM (#1092752) Journal

        Places where they were raising cattle in the past now need extraordinary measures to keep the Anika from overheating and dying.

        Sure, they do. Needless to say, I think Occams razor cuts differently here.

        And the government bailed out the banks because so many of the properties had a negative worth. One bank tried to just give 8,000 properties to the city. The city said okay, if you pay the costs of bulldozing the homes and disconnecting the utilities. So the bank still holds the properties, they're totally worthless (gutted for wiring, plumbing, fixtures, windows and doors, full of mould, squatters, roof fallen in, fire damage. Some of these places had been flipped sight unseen by one speculator after another, $500 ballooning to $155,000 and then defaulting.

        First thing here is that this unnamed city (not cities) here probably has serious problems in the first place. After all, they too are letting that property rot.

        Keep in mind that the bank can hold those properties at an inflated value, thereby reducing their costs of maintaining reserve (among other things, meaning they can lend out more money). A gutted building still has value to them.

        • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @06:17AM (6 children)

          by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @06:17AM (#1093134) Journal
          Other places, the developers bulldozed new homes because they were suddenly too expensive to sell, and the taxes were to high. I first saw this while passing through the burbs of Toronto in the previous century, where developers bulldozed brand new warehouses. Better to hold the raw land for a couple of decades than to have to pay taxes on the building, then have to extensively modify it for a new tenant 20 years later and it's no longer considered a new building anyway.

          There's plenty of videos out there of new buildings being demolished by the property owners. They get an immediate 100% tax write off on the building, reclaiming some of the taxes they paid on sales at the height of the boom. Gives them cash flow. And a vacant serviced lot.

          --
          SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday December 31 2020, @12:45PM (5 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 31 2020, @12:45PM (#1093198) Journal

            Other places, the developers bulldozed new homes because they were suddenly too expensive to sell, and the taxes were to high.

            Why would there be "too high" taxes on a building with negative value? Last I heard, taxes were more or less proportional to the value of the property.

            I first saw this while passing through the burbs of Toronto in the previous century, where developers bulldozed brand new warehouses. Better to hold the raw land for a couple of decades than to have to pay taxes on the building, then have to extensively modify it for a new tenant 20 years later and it's no longer considered a new building anyway.

            In other words, they destroyed good property because of bad tax law. Among other things, it's the broken window fallacy. And I find it remarkable that you think holding raw land for two decades is better.

            • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @08:50PM (4 children)

              by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @08:50PM (#1093404) Journal
              So rather than accept what really happened, which is easy to verify via hundreds of thousands of videos and public auctions that sold buildings for $500 and failed to attract bids for other buildings at that low price, you continue to stick your fingers in your ears and say "that doesn't make sense to me so it cannot be true." Typical kallow.

              If you're a developer and you can't rent out or sell a warehouse, it's value decreases with time while it's carrying costs increase. After a while just the passing of time means it's no longer grade a, so it's less desirable than vacant land that can be custom built to a tenants needs.

              It's why many commercial buildings are either bulldozed, imploded, or gutted after 50 years - they're worth less in their current state than the land on which they sit is worth empty.

              It's like swimming pools. They used to add value to a home. Then they came to be seen as a negative feature with high maintenance and the need to add restrictive ugly fences that took away the aesthetic. People were deducting the cost of filling in the pool from their offers.

              same with fireplaces. Can't use them even with catalytic chimneys, so deduct the cost of removing and repairs to the walls.

              The benefits in terms of fewer winter smog days made the banning of fire places worth it. In most cases, even with heating inserts, they were still net losers of heat, and raised insurance rates. People don't miss them after a while.

              Same as they don't miss the old diesel buses when the hybrids are quieter and cheaper to run, and the electrics even quieter and cheaper. Less pollution and air conditioned are just plain nice bonuses. Tax payers like that. Same with school buses.

              --
              SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday December 31 2020, @10:12PM (3 children)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 31 2020, @10:12PM (#1093417) Journal

                So rather than accept what really happened, which is easy to verify via hundreds of thousands of videos and public auctions that sold buildings for $500 and failed to attract bids for other buildings at that low price, you continue to stick your fingers in your ears and say "that doesn't make sense to me so it cannot be true."

                Because you wrote "new homes" and "brand new warehouses". That's not a sign of a healthy economy when valuable real estate gets destroyed merely to lower property taxes.

                It's why many commercial buildings are either bulldozed, imploded, or gutted after 50 years - they're worth less in their current state than the land on which they sit is worth empty.

                Sorry, that's not it. You started this thread talking about real estate from the last real estate bubble. Most that is less than 20 years old. I have no problems with old structures being razed to make way for a more valuable use of the property. That's human history ever since we started building stuff thousands of years ago. What's different here is destroying new property merely because of taxes. It's particularly ridiculous since you started this thread advocating for high taxes. So we see here that one of the problems of your higher taxation is that it encourages more destruction of good real estate. That's dumb.

                I also am less than inspired by your examples. I assure you that in warm climates those pools are still seen as advantages. And making fireplaces and diesel buses costly via regulation is just more of the same bad ideas you've been having.

                • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Thursday December 31 2020, @11:40PM (2 children)

                  by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Thursday December 31 2020, @11:40PM (#1093430) Journal
                  Communities that calculate the excess deaths of pollution caused by Diesel engines, as well as increased health care costs, don't want Diesel engines any more. Once you factor in the costs of externalities, electric is cheaper.'

                  After all, dead people don't contribute to the economy, or the tax base.

                  'kind of like the story of your life. And you're never going to have any sort of professional career. Simply not qualified by either temperament or ability.

                  --
                  SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 01 2021, @02:17AM (1 child)

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 01 2021, @02:17AM (#1093466) Journal

                    Communities that calculate the excess deaths of pollution caused by Diesel engines, as well as increased health care costs, don't want Diesel engines any more.

                    Communities are notorious for being unable to make such calculations.

                    • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 01 2021, @03:57AM

                      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 01 2021, @03:57AM (#1093490) Journal
                      Except that because of the climate crisis, communities are getting better at including externalities in total costs. It's why diesels are being banned. Particulates and exhaust raise death rates, especially among people living within one block of main roads. Ditto hospitalizations and days lost.

                      We banned fireplaces years ago. Winter air is noticeably cleaner.

                      The hybrid buses are quieter, and use less fuel despite being air conditioned.

                      Which is why there's almost a billion being spent on an underground garage for the new electric fleet, and more $$$ for another 800 all-electric buses. And 5 billion or more for an electric regional transit system to connect to the existing electric subway system.

                      So maybe communities in the USA are still shitty at defying lobbyists, but that's your problem. Not mine. We've got tons of clean green electricity, might as well use it.

                      --
                      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.