Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
Breaking News
posted by janrinok on Thursday September 08 2022, @06:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the R.I.P. dept.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61585886

Buckingham Palace has announced that Queen Elizabeth II has died.

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Sunday September 11 2022, @01:13PM (2 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Sunday September 11 2022, @01:13PM (#1271199)

    I agree but historically, it hasn't always worked out like that. In 1642 the reason why Cromwell and Fairfax were buddies during the interregnum - between them they had the army sewn up, so that whatever stuff the puritans and other factions threw at them, at the end of the day they could (and did) fall back on the support of the army (against the interest of the King).

    If you look up the history of the interregnum, it is basically Cromwell cycling through different approaches to forming a government in order to find any system which is remotely viable, and largely failing. He was capable enough to keep on top of things, when he died no one knew what to do and put his feckless son in charge - at which point Monck, a senior general, decided things were a mess and went to Charles II (son of the beheaded king, hanging out in France) and asked him to sort it out. Once again, it was the army which decided, this time for the king. In 1688 it was (arguably) the defection of John Churchill, head of the army, to the invading Prince William, as well as James II being a prat, that swung things against the Stuart monarchy, against the king but for his son in law.

    Very interesting period, well worth looking into.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday September 11 2022, @05:54PM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 11 2022, @05:54PM (#1271219) Journal

    The reason that the Oath of Allegiance is written the way it is is precisely because it was written after Cromwell and others, and it reflects the relationship between the Monarch, Parliament and the people.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2022, @04:48AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2022, @04:48AM (#1271438)

    That was then, this is now.

    If Ms Truss stood up and said "Parliament has voted. We're going to become a Republic. Soldiers go and arrest the Monarch and seize all the royal property.", then the person in The Tower for treason at the end of the day isn't going to be Charlie.