Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday November 16 2020, @02:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the thawing-v.-melting dept.

Climate Scientists Debunk 'Point of No Return' Paper Everyone's Freaking Out About:

On Thursday, a new study came out warning that even if we stopped emitting carbon dioxide, the world has reached the "point of no return" for climate change. The paper claims that's because Arctic permafrost — carbon-rich, permanently frozen earth made of rocks, water, and dead wildlife — is melting irreversibly, and it could continue to heat the planet for centuries by releasing carbon dioxide. Terrifying, right?

The only solution, the authors indicate, is to suck carbon out of the air with carbon capture, which is yet unproven to work at scale, or to employ even more dangerous geoengineering technologies. The study's results and conclusions have been covered widely and a bit breathlessly, but here's the thing: The analysis has some big problems.

"To be frank, the paper is crap that should not have passed any competent peer review," Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist and energy systems analyst, said. "It's an interesting thought experiment, but its results should be taken with extreme scepticism until more complex Earth System Models produce similar results."

Referenced Report:
Jorgen Randers, Ulrich Goluke. An earth system model shows self-sustained melting of permafrost even if all man-made GHG emissions stop in 2020 [open], Scientific Reports (DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75481-z)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday November 17 2020, @02:24AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 17 2020, @02:24AM (#1078069) Journal

    Environmental treaties have nothing at all to do with climate change mitigation.

    The Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement do. Unless, of course, you're going to classify them based on outcome. Then most climate change mitigation wouldn't be. You'd be begging the question.