SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This article talks about the newest addition to the Iraqi Air Force, a drone. Surely this is unremarkable piece of equipment, we seen it before right? Except upon closer inspection (or by reading TFA, which is less likely) you quickly realize it is not in fact the U.S. made Predator drone, but a Chinese CH-4. The CH-4 is far from a cheap knock-off, but instead is claimed to be superior in every way to the U.S. drone. It sports such revolutionary additions as longer wing-span, bigger payload, and of course "upside down tail thingy."
Is this a story of every increasing proliferation of armed drones around the world, the willingness of some nations to export advance hardware anywhere, or simply a piece about military/industrial espionage? You be the judge.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday October 15 2015, @03:38PM
No worries about reselling. The Iraqis just drop their weapons, leaving them behind for the terrorists to pick up. Iraq is the New France of the 21st century. DAESH wasn't entirely armed by Iraq, but Iraq gets a lot of the credit.
FOR SALE: Fifteen CH-4 Chinese drones, slightly used. Only dropped once!
(Score: 3, Touché) by SanityCheck on Thursday October 15 2015, @03:49PM
Of course, I would say it's US that gets most of the credit, since Iraqi's didn't pay for all that on their own. Your Tax Dollars at Work.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by bob_super on Thursday October 15 2015, @03:50PM
If the Shia government stopped being asses to the Sunni population of Western Iraq, maybe the army there would bother to fight the Sunni insurgents.
The Iraq army cannot hold those areas because they're considered as either invadors (if Shia or Kurd) or traitors (if Sunni). Just look at the maps of Daesh [ixquick-proxy.com] vs sunni/shia areas [ixquick-proxy.com].
Daesh is the horrible default choice for the locals, and the defacto government of the sunnis of Iraq and Syria. No amount of drones or bombs can solve that problem until there is a political peaceful leadership for the Sunni minority.
(which makes it completely unlike 1940 Germany/France)
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Thursday October 15 2015, @04:44PM
The thing is, intelligent people knew all of this before we invaded Iraq the first time.
Also, during the first invasion, we promised the Shia to stand behind them when they overthrew the Baathists. Then we broke that promise, leaving the Shia at the mercy of the Baathists.
After all of our history in the mid-east, I'm amazed that any Arab, Persian, or North African puts any trust in the US/UK. The one constant in all of the mid-east/western relations has been treachery on the part of the west. The few times that a western or Chritian ruler has kept his word to the people of the region are quite remarkable.
(Score: 2) by tibman on Thursday October 15 2015, @05:11PM
You are right. It isn't often talked about but in 1991 we promised to support the southern rebellion against Saddam. Then we pulled out and left them to be massacred. Those people have extremely long memories too. I worked with a Mongolian unit (part of the coalition) and they were constantly harassed by the locals to the point that they could not leave the FOB without an escort.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
(Score: 1) by deadstick on Thursday October 15 2015, @05:18PM
Those people have extremely long memories
If we'd been paying attention, the Shia-Sunni schism would have told us that...
(Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Friday October 16 2015, @12:55AM
not to mention, how many times is it we've hung the kurds out to dry ? ? ?
two or three ?
where we armed them, funded them, incited them, promised we'd always love them, then when the fighting or politics turned sour, we abandoned them to die...
how many dozens of times has unka sam done that world wide ? ? ?
um, so they hate us for our freedoms, is it ? ? ?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by tibman on Thursday October 15 2015, @05:01PM
The pendulum swings both ways. The previous Sunni government under Saddam crushed the Shia pretty hard. The mass graves outside Karbala with tens of thousands of Shia in it are a big motivation to never let the Sunni come to power again. You are right, of course, that if the government was more equal then the Sunni might fight more. But i think the Shia militias of southern Iraq who are fighting to retake Sunni towns in the north is more than good enough incentive.
I helped recruit and train the southern police and we tried to instill a sense of nationality in them. That their duties extend beyond the borders of their town. I have more faith in the southern police (which includes SWAT) to repel invaders than their national army. I fought the Mahdi army, a southern militia, because they saw the US as an invader (we were). They are certainly not cowards. But because they fought the US so hard back then they are being marginalized now by the US in the fight to retake cities from Daesh. If a Shia militia, a non-government army, retakes the north (while also rejecting US support) then what does that say about the real iraq army (with US support)? Nothing good, that's for sure.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.