Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday April 02 2014, @02:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the there-is-money-to-be-made dept.

Under the headline, "The Wolf Hunters of Wall Street", The New York Times Magazine is running this review of a new book. It tells a long story that ends in the creation of IEX (Investors Exchange), a new stock exchange with the intent of bypassing the unfair advantages that co-located high-speed traders currently have. After a few weeks of operation near the end of 2013, their volume was larger than AMEX(!!)

Here's a quote from near the end of the book review:

IEX had made its point: That to function properly, a financial market didn't need to be rigged in someone's favor. It didn't need payment for order flow and co-location and all sorts of unfair advantages possessed by a small handful of traders. All it needed was for investors to take responsibility for understanding it, and then to seize its controls.

"The backbone of the market," Brad Katsuyama (President & Chief Executive Officer, IEX) says, "is investors coming together to trade." While the article is long, I enjoyed the story. I have no connection to this company, but here's their website.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by etherscythe on Wednesday April 02 2014, @11:21PM

    by etherscythe (937) on Wednesday April 02 2014, @11:21PM (#25239) Journal

    Feel free to enlighten me. No, seriously, I don't have a burning need to be "right"; if you have credible sources I will give credit where it's due.

    From where I sit, HFT algo wars lead to things like market bubbles, which are unhealthy and lead to collapses that destroy retirement plans and such (to say nothing of bugs causing flash crashes and the cascading effects therefrom). I've seen markets collapse and investments go down in flames. I have yet to see a HFT algo used to cure cancer, or really any positive benefit at all for anyone who doesn't have the money to drop for high-end hardware and connections. Maybe it's there, but it's certainly not to be found in your reply. Show me and I'll change my tune.

    But then, if you're not seeing how corporate campaign donations and lobbying that result from that personhood are skewing the political landscape with disproportionate effects for those who are not in the 1%, we probably have irreconcilable differences of perspective, at which point there is nothing more to discuss. Given your tone, I wouldn't be surprised.

    --
    "Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday April 03 2014, @02:37AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 03 2014, @02:37AM (#25298) Journal

    HFT algo wars lead to things like market bubbles and lead to collapses that destroy retirement plans and such (to say nothing of bugs causing flash crashes and the cascading effects therefrom).

    Why would it? You need incorrect valuation for a bubble to occur and it can be worsened by easy credit from some sort like central banks or high levels of leverage. That has nothing to do with speed of trade.

    I have yet to see a HFT algo used to cure cancer, or really any positive benefit at all for anyone who doesn't have the money to drop for high-end hardware and connections.

    Pension funds don't do that either.

    But then, if you're not seeing how corporate campaign donations and lobbying that result from that personhood are skewing the political landscape with disproportionate effects for those who are not in the 1%, we probably have irreconcilable differences of perspective, at which point there is nothing more to discuss.

    I guess it's time to move on then.