Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Alfred on Monday November 02 2015, @10:54PM

    by Alfred (4006) on Monday November 02 2015, @10:54PM (#257727) Journal
    I use Time Machine so you know I'm good.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by maxwell demon on Tuesday November 03 2015, @12:15AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 03 2015, @12:15AM (#257754) Journal

    Yeah, a time machine is a great way to recover information; just go back into the past, copy the data and try not to change anything while in the past so you don't run into a time paradox. However you should always have a second time machine as backup, in case the first one fails. And of course, you should regularly test that backup.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Tuesday November 03 2015, @05:18AM

      by mhajicek (51) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 03 2015, @05:18AM (#257822)

      That which is measured is changed...

      --
      The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    • (Score: 2) by fliptop on Friday November 13 2015, @04:16PM

      by fliptop (1666) on Friday November 13 2015, @04:16PM (#262713) Journal

      However you should always have a second time machine as backup, in case the first one fails. And of course, you should regularly test that backup.

      By taking the second back with you in the first? [imdb.com]

      --
      To be oneself, and unafraid whether right or wrong, is more admirable than the easy cowardice of surrender to conformity
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 03 2015, @07:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 03 2015, @07:45PM (#258081)

    Wouldn't going to the past to retrieve the data create a paradox because now you'll have the data and no longer have an incentive to go back to the past in the first place?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 06 2015, @04:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 06 2015, @04:30PM (#259519)

      Not if you take the copy of the data with you when going back to the future.