Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday April 03 2014, @08:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the back-to-spy-school dept.

Michele Chabin reports that the possible US decision to free spy Jonathan Pollard, an American Jew convicted in 1987 of spying for Israel, has politicians, settlers and activists on all sides in an uproar over whether the price is too high. Israel's news media reported that the Obama administration is weighing the release of Pollard in return for Israeli concessions to the Palestinians on settlement building and freeing of Palestinian prisoners. Pollard was arrested on November 21, 1985 after the conclusion of an investigation into suspicion he was spying for Israel. He was convicted in 1987 to a life sentence for one count of espionage.

Pollard is the only person in US history to receive a life sentence for spying for an ally and the only American citizen convicted of such a crime to be sentenced to more than 10 years in prison. Pollard is considered by many in Israel and the American Jewish community to be a national hero. Supporters of his release argue that his sentencing was disproportionately harsh and that he was acting out of loyalty to Israel, not mal-intent against the U.S., and that the documents he handed over to Israel were about Arab countries and the Soviet Union, not US intelligence methods. US officials claim the damage done by Pollard's spying is far worse than people realize. In an interview with Foreign Policy, retired Adm. Thomas Brooks, the former director of naval intelligence, said Pollard's actions have been "exceeded only by Edward Snowden," the NSA whistleblower. The last time US officials considered releasing Pollard during the Clinton administration, CIA Director George Tenet told Clinton he would resign if Pollard were released.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Pherenikos on Thursday April 03 2014, @10:56PM

    by Pherenikos (1113) on Thursday April 03 2014, @10:56PM (#25916)

    I would agree that Snowden served the American people if he only released information pertaining to illegal spying on American citizens, however when he released information about our intelligence operations on foreign targets, it becomes much less clear. Even though it is unsavory, activities like tapping Angela Merkels phone was both good tradecraft and likely a good source of info.

  • (Score: 1) by glyph on Friday April 04 2014, @01:05PM

    by glyph (245) on Friday April 04 2014, @01:05PM (#26161)

    Snowden certainly didn't have the resources to pick and choose what has been released, but it was important he got it out there to be responsibly vetted by journalists. Also, I love how Merkel is considered a "foreign target" now. When should we expect the drone strike?