SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
On Monday at the Center for Strategic & International Studies' Global Security Forum, John Brennan, Director of the US' Central Intelligence Agency, spoke about the recent bombings in Paris. In what many commentators took as a reference to Edward Snowden, but could instead refer to the Church Committee, Brennan predicted that finding the attackers will be more difficult than it would have been, had intelligence services been left unchecked:
In the past several years, because of a number of unauthorized disclosures and a lot of hand-wringing over the government's role in the effort to try to uncover these terrorists, there have been some policy and legal and other actions that are taken that make our ability collectively, internationally to find these terrorists much more challenging.
I do hope that this is going to be a wake-up call particularly in areas of Europe where I think there has been a misrepresentation of what the intelligence security services are doing by some quarters that are designed to undercut those capabilities.
[...]
There are a lot of technological capabilities that are available right now that make it exceptionally difficult both technically as well as legally for intelligence security services to have insight that they need to uncover it.
Brennan's complete remarks are available in video via C-SPAN.
[Additional coverage after the break]
- Politico
- Politico
- Foreign Policy
- Daily Mail
- Jerusalem Post
- Guardian
- Time
- Time
- RT
- Sacramento Bee
- CBS News
- Newsweek (limited access; requires Javascript)
- Breitbart News
- Democracy Now!
- Reason blog
(Score: 2) by M. Baranczak on Wednesday November 18 2015, @05:35PM
(Score: 3, Insightful) by theluggage on Wednesday November 18 2015, @06:36PM
A wake-up call is something you yourself arrange ahead of time, it shouldn't take you by surprise.
I wonder if I'll finish typing this before 100 9/11 conspiracy theorists post the obvious comeback...?
If only I didn't believe in Hanlon's Razor.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2015, @09:35PM
> If you think about it, it makes no sense. A wake-up call is something you yourself arrange ahead of time, it shouldn't take you by surprise.
You aren't the first person to make that complaint recently: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/11/isis-paris-attacks-rubio-republicans/416085/ [theatlantic.com]
And I think it is a complaint that is totally bogus. Words can have more than one definition and that usage is nothing new. In fact, it is so well established that it is already in Webster's dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wake-up+call [merriam-webster.com]