Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Friday November 20 2015, @11:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the this-ain't-dilbert dept.
We've previously covered Scott Adam's writings on gender discrimination. Now we see an expansion of his thoughts on the gender war and how it relates to terrorism:

I came across this piece on Scott Adam's blog and found it quite interesting. Thought others here might find it interesting too:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/133406477506/global-gender-war#_=_

So if you are wondering how men become cold-blooded killers, it isn't religion that is doing it. If you put me in that situation, I can say with confidence I would sign up for suicide bomb duty. And I'm not even a believer. Men like hugging better than they like killing. But if you take away my access to hugging, I will probably start killing, just to feel something. I'm designed that way. I'm a normal boy. And I make no apology for it.

Now consider the controversy over the Syrian immigrants. The photos show mostly men of fighting age. No one cares about adult men, so a 1% chance of a hidden terrorist in the group – who might someday kill women and children – is unacceptable. I have twice blogged on the idea of siphoning out the women and small kids from the Caliphate and leaving millions of innocent adult men to suffer and die. I don't recall anyone complaining about leaving millions of innocent adult males to horrible suffering. In this country, any solution to a problem that involves killing millions of adult men is automatically on the table.

If you kill infidels, you will be rewarded with virgins in heaven. But if you kill your own leaders today – the ones holding the leash on your balls – you can have access to women tomorrow. And tomorrow is sooner.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Saturday November 21 2015, @02:33PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Saturday November 21 2015, @02:33PM (#266178)

    Unless both parties require about the same amount of sex, the low demand partner is going to have to agree to some sex that they aren't enthusiastic about for the health of the marriage.

    I wonder why these discussions are always about marriage. The exact same thing could be said if you just replaced that word with "relationship". Marriage is just a silly social ritual that some people seem to believe is magic; I see little reason to assume that it's an inevitability in a relationship or that it will magically improve everything.

    That's abuse and there's really no other way of looking at it.

    Controlling your own body is abusing someone else? You're not entitled to sex in the first place. If someone doesn't consent to having sex with you, you have not lost anything, so there's no conceivable way withholding sex could qualify as "abuse".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Sunday November 22 2015, @01:45AM

    by jdavidb (5690) on Sunday November 22 2015, @01:45AM (#266408) Homepage Journal
    For what it's worth, Dr. Harley's experience has found that his methods are much more likely to work with marriages than with relationships that are not legally married. There are exceptions.
    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
  • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Sunday November 22 2015, @01:47AM

    by jdavidb (5690) on Sunday November 22 2015, @01:47AM (#266409) Homepage Journal

    Controlling your own body is abusing someone else? You're not entitled to sex in the first place.

    Yes, exactly! In Dr. Harley's nomenclature, to engage in abuse, you have to actually do something. Not doing something is not abuse, and in fact he encourages you to not do something in your relationship if you are not enthusiastic about it.

    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    • (Score: 1) by Francis on Sunday November 22 2015, @12:23PM

      by Francis (5544) on Sunday November 22 2015, @12:23PM (#266515)

      Withholding is an action you engage in in this context. Not having sex because you're physically unable is one thing, not having sex to control the other person is quite a different thing.

      And yes, withholding sex definitely is a form of abuse. You see it on TV all the time being used as abuse and nobody seems to care. But, anytime you're doing something to take power from somebody else and use it to control them, that is abuse. If Dr. Harley is arguing otherwise, then he's a fucking moron that ought to have his license revoked because that's not competent psychological treatment.

      • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Sunday November 22 2015, @12:54PM

        by jdavidb (5690) on Sunday November 22 2015, @12:54PM (#266524) Homepage Journal

        If Dr. Harley is arguing otherwise, then he's a fucking moron that ought to have his license revoked because that's not competent psychological treatment.

        The thing is, his approach leads to a happy relationship with lots of sex, whereas the approach of calling your wife or girlfriend an abuser or otherwise lecturing her for not having sex with you leads to loneliness and sexual frustration.

        --
        ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings