Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday November 25 2015, @10:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-goat-on-with-it dept.

China's western Shaanxi Province is known for rugged windswept terrain and its coal and wool, but not necessarily its science. Yet at the Shaanxi Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center for Shaanbei Cashmere Goats, scientists have just created a new kind of goat, with bigger muscles and longer hair than normal. The goats were made not by breeding but by directly manipulating animal DNA—a sign of how rapidly China has embraced a global gene-changing revolution.

Geneticist Lei Qu wants to increase goatherd incomes by boosting how much meat and wool each animal produces. For years research projects at his lab in Yulin, a former garrison town along the Great Wall, stumbled along, Qu's colleagues say. "The results were not so obvious, although we had worked so many years," his research assistant, Haijing Zhu, wrote in an e-mail.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by dyingtolive on Wednesday November 25 2015, @11:41PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Wednesday November 25 2015, @11:41PM (#268179)

    "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should."

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Insightful=1, Overrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday November 26 2015, @12:59AM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 26 2015, @12:59AM (#268192) Journal

    You do know that that line was there just to hand-wave away why people smart enough to reincarnate dinos weren't quite bright enough to safely store them, right? "Life will find a way" is another one. Remeber "I know this system"...? Same thing.

    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈 - Give us ribbiti or make us croak! 🐸
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday November 26 2015, @01:03AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday November 26 2015, @01:03AM (#268193) Journal

      To ethicists and proponents of restricting science, Jurassic Park is a documentary film series, not blockbuster entertainment.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:24AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:24AM (#268215)

      Brilliance is a non-fungible resource. Being good at one thing does not make you good at another. I'd think computer scientists, engineers, and physicists would have learned their lesson when trying to find a mate in highschool, but arrogance dies hard.