Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday December 01 2015, @06:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the eat,-drink,-and-be-happy dept.

The domestication of wild grains has played a major role in human evolution, facilitating the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to one based on agriculture. You might think that the grains were used for bread, which today represents a basic staple. But some scientists argue that it wasn't bread that motivated our ancestors to start grain farming. It was beer. Man, they say, chose pints over pastry.

Beer has plenty to recommend it over bread. First, and most obviously, it is pleasant to drink. "Beer had all the same nutrients as bread, and it had one additional advantage," argues Solomon H. Katz, an anthropology professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Namely, it gave early humans the same pleasant buzz it gives us. Patrick E. McGovern, the director of the Biomolecular Archaeology Project for Cuisine, Fermented Beverages, and Health at the University of Pennsylvania, goes even further. Beer, he says, was more nutritious than bread. It contains "more B vitamins and [more of the] essential amino acid lysine," McGovern writes in his book, Uncorking the Past: the Quest for Wine, Beer, and Other Alcoholic Beverages. It was also safer to drink than water, because the fermentation process killed pathogenic microorganisms. "With a four to five percent alcohol content, beer is a potent mind-altering and medicinal substance," McGovern says, adding that ancient brewers acted as medicine men.

We hold these things to be self-evident: The Internet is for Pr0n, and Civilization is for Beer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @02:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @02:55PM (#270688)

    I doubt there existed countries back then.

  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Wednesday December 02 2015, @04:29PM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Wednesday December 02 2015, @04:29PM (#270770) Homepage Journal

    No, but there existed conclaves of humanity, and unless you want to claim that global communication existed before 'domestication' of men...

    There is no way you can turn this around into a fact. Beer has got nothing to do with agriculture.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @05:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @05:30PM (#270799)
      I'm sure the authors will be interested to know you've so cleverly debunked their research.
      • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Wednesday December 02 2015, @06:56PM

        by cubancigar11 (330) on Wednesday December 02 2015, @06:56PM (#270840) Homepage Journal

        How is there interest so important? Now instead of looking at science we are looking scientists. When you stop scrutinizing you stop doing science,