Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

State Supreme Court to Rule on Red-light Cameras

posted by janrinok on Saturday April 05 2014, @07:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-would-have-been-here-earlier-but... dept.

starcraftsicko writes:

The legality of red-light camera evidence in California is set to be reviewed by the California Supreme Court.

Ars Technica reports, the California Supreme Court is hearing the case in an attempt to answer three basic questions:

  1. What testimony, if any, regarding the accuracy and reliability of the automated traffic enforcement system (ATES) is required as a prerequisite to admission of the ATES-generated evidence?
  2. Is the ATES evidence hearsay?
  3. If so, do any exceptions apply?

Cameras in Ohio are also facing state supreme court scrutiny. The SCOTUS has been silent so far on traffic cameras but has previously ruled on the need to be able to be able to question diagnostic equipment operators to ensure a fair trial to avoid hearsay.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
State Supreme Court to Rule on Red-light Cameras | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 23 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 06 2014, @05:36AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 06 2014, @05:36AM (#26965)

    A cop with a radar gun has the potential to ba criminal because the cop is present, they don't need the civil loophole.