Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday December 16 2015, @10:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the he's-all-toy'd-up dept.

An unidentified man has been arrested in England in connection with the hack of VTech, a Hong Kong toy maker:

Police in England said they arrested a 21-year-old man on Tuesday in connection with last month's breach of VTech, a Hong Kong electronic toy maker, which exposed personal data for 12 million people, including 6.4 million minors. Hackers also made off with profile photos and chat logs of millions of parents and their children.

British police said they arrested the man, who has not been identified, in Bracknell, a town 32 miles outside of London, for breaking England's Computer Misuse Act, including "unauthorized access" to a computer and data, according to a statement released by Britain's South East Regional Organized Crime Unit.

Last month, VTech said its online database store was compromised by hackers. Among the stolen data were names, email addresses, passwords, profile information, mailing addresses and download histories belonging to parents, as well as names, genders and birth dates of children. The breach was notable for the fact that children's personal information was compromised. Security experts say children are a frequent target for identity thieves because their clean credit histories can be used to apply for government benefits, open bank and credit card accounts and apply for loans.

But the hacker believed to be behind the breach told Vice's Motherboard blog that he did not intend to sell or use the data, but instead to draw publicity to VTech's weak security practices. The hacker told Motherboard that he was able to breach two databases, containing personal data for millions of parents and children, using a simple hacking technique called a SQL injection, in which hackers enter commands that prompt a database to dump its contents.

Previously: Hack of Toy Maker VTech Exposes Families


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @11:37AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @11:37AM (#277036)

    But he's no more guilty of anything than the company are, and the supplier of the web engine.

    Broken software should be known to be broken. The companies behind it should be named and shamed.
    Companies who do not take due diligence to ensure their customers' data is secure should be outed.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by PizzaRollPlinkett on Wednesday December 16 2015, @12:23PM

    by PizzaRollPlinkett (4512) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @12:23PM (#277046)

    So our "cyber" defenders finally caught a hacker! This is the lowest of the low hanging fruit, but they finally caught one. Have they ever caught anything but low-hanging fruit? This guy will have the book thrown at him because he's the only hacker they've caught in years, and we've spent billions on "cyber" this and "cyber" that and have to have something to show for it. Meanwhile, the corporation and its lowest-bidder software contractors (wouldn't you love to know who they outsourced their web development to?) aren't held accountable at all. If a hacker who can get caught by the "cyber" defenders can breach their defenses, then the corporation ought to have some culpability here, too. They'd just point fingers at their consultants, who would point fingers at some offshore company, who would point fingers at someone else. Plausible deniability is built into this stuff.

    --
    (E-mail me if you want a pizza roll!)
    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Gravis on Wednesday December 16 2015, @02:39PM

      by Gravis (4596) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @02:39PM (#277096)

      Plausible deniability is built into this stuff.

      i think you mean "Plausible cyber deniability". ;)

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by LoRdTAW on Wednesday December 16 2015, @12:43PM

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @12:43PM (#277049) Journal

    If a Hong Kong hacker broke into a UK Toy company, everyone would just write it off and go about their day.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @01:20PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @01:20PM (#277062)

    this guy is in deep shit.

    there were photos of the kids from their toys and he had tens of thousands of photos.

    guaranteed to be some nudes. so now he's hacking for cp.

    sounds like the kind of shit a court would want to make an example out of.

    nice life buddy. too bad it ended at 21.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by isostatic on Wednesday December 16 2015, @02:06PM

      by isostatic (365) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @02:06PM (#277078) Journal

      What kid of toys are this? My kids have some vtech toys (toot toot drivers, baby walker, etc). I'm not aware of them having cameras or connecting to the internet.

      What kind of toy needs internet access? How does it connect without the parent knowing?

      • (Score: 2) by rob_on_earth on Wednesday December 16 2015, @04:00PM

        by rob_on_earth (5485) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @04:00PM (#277160) Homepage

        hints are that its the vtech tablets. We have the 1st gen one, sans camera and its the only reason I signed up to learning-lodge. They offered a set of credits for free apps in the box.

        As I remember the offerings available we not very interesting.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @10:57PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 16 2015, @10:57PM (#277364)

          Yeah, kids tablets have the problem of not being mainstream so they end up being no better than the cheap non-name chinese models.

          For most people its just better to get an old ipad, put a big thick shock-absorber case on it and curate the apps yourself.

    • (Score: 2) by Tramii on Wednesday December 16 2015, @05:10PM

      by Tramii (920) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @05:10PM (#277205)

      guaranteed to be some nudes. so now he's hacking for cp.

      So... VTech was (is?) storing child porn on their servers?

    • (Score: 2) by Hyperturtle on Wednesday December 16 2015, @11:01PM

      by Hyperturtle (2824) on Wednesday December 16 2015, @11:01PM (#277370)

      What nefarious thing did he do, besides exposing the problem? It doesn't seem like he profited from it other than benefiting the world from his actions exposing how bad "cloud" security can be. Just because he thought of the children doesn't mean you can go around screaming think of the children! lock him up because there might be nudes? of kids? MIGHT?

      Shame on vtech for what they did. Shame on them for not being able to provide free 24x7 credit monitoring to your nude child example. Shame on them for being so stupid, and shame on them for not writing that guy a reward check and offering him a job for resisting the urge to sell all that stuff a 100x over because he could.

      Instead, he went to the media. Which is probably far worse from their perspective than if he quietly sold the stuff on some black market.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 17 2015, @03:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 17 2015, @03:21AM (#277471)
        Well, next time someone finds such vulnerabilities they'll just sell them for all they're worth. At least then if the hacker gets caught he at least made some money. That's the sort of behaviour they want to encourage it seems.