Learning from the past: What yesterday's media can tell us about the times
If you want to get a real feel for what was happening during a certain period in history, how people really felt about the issues of the day, take a look at the media coverage.
For example, a recent study of how historically black newspapers covered the landmark 1967 Supreme Court case that legalized interracial marriage, Loving v. Virginia, found their coverage not that much different from their mainstream counterparts.
The team of researchers, including a journalism professor from Michigan State University, was surprised by the findings, as they hypothesized that black newspapers would be more sympathetic to the racially mixed couple who challenged the Virginia law.
Historically, said MSU’s Geri Alumit Zeldes, the African-American press is an advocate for civil rights.
“Just knowing how the ethnic press operates, we thought they were going to be very one-sided in favor of the Lovings,” she said. “But they followed the same pattern as the mainstream media such as the New York Times and others.”
Zeldes said one of the lessons learned from this, something that hasn’t changed since the first newspaper was printed, is that news is a cultural mirror of what is going on in society at that point in time.
“If you take a look at the newspapers at the time they were published, they will give you hints as to what the times were like,” she said. “So if we look at the black press at that time period, you can get a sense of what the black community was thinking because those reporters were part of that community.”
Zeldes said that by reviewing the newspapers’ stances on the issue, it gives us a clue to the political and cultural mood of the time.
“It indicates,” she said, “that some segments of society in the late 1960s were ready to lessen social and cultural marriage restrictions, but that other groups in the United States were still undecided.”
News as a Cultural Mirror: Historically Black Newspapers Reflecting Public Views of Loving v. Virginia (1967) (DOI: 10.1111/josi.12144)
(Score: 2) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday January 02 2016, @06:12AM
True, at least about the far east (I think the eastern Europe & Russia women fetish is mostly a US thing, never was anything all that special around here in Europe or at least not to the same degree), however they usually have plenty of experience with blond (or not) ice-queen princesses and there's your answer right there; personally I'd gladly take some Korean wanna-be gangster wife threatening to slap me around or some Thai broad saying she'll knife me or cut my dick off if I go all "butterfly" instead of more of that passive-aggressive non-communicating "do-whatever-I'm-not-even-aware-of-thinking-I-want-you-to-do" shit :3 (not that I will, I'm happy being a bachelor). And btw are the majority of Japanese females completely psycho or is it just a popular fad? Their "rotten girl" stuff can be even worse than anything else.
Somewhere out there people are actually having (and working hard on maintaining) healthy relationships: kudos to all of you, well done!
P.S. I'm not so sure one can trust old newspapers any more than the current ones.
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))