Learning from the past: What yesterday's media can tell us about the times
If you want to get a real feel for what was happening during a certain period in history, how people really felt about the issues of the day, take a look at the media coverage.
For example, a recent study of how historically black newspapers covered the landmark 1967 Supreme Court case that legalized interracial marriage, Loving v. Virginia, found their coverage not that much different from their mainstream counterparts.
The team of researchers, including a journalism professor from Michigan State University, was surprised by the findings, as they hypothesized that black newspapers would be more sympathetic to the racially mixed couple who challenged the Virginia law.
Historically, said MSU’s Geri Alumit Zeldes, the African-American press is an advocate for civil rights.
“Just knowing how the ethnic press operates, we thought they were going to be very one-sided in favor of the Lovings,” she said. “But they followed the same pattern as the mainstream media such as the New York Times and others.”
Zeldes said one of the lessons learned from this, something that hasn’t changed since the first newspaper was printed, is that news is a cultural mirror of what is going on in society at that point in time.
“If you take a look at the newspapers at the time they were published, they will give you hints as to what the times were like,” she said. “So if we look at the black press at that time period, you can get a sense of what the black community was thinking because those reporters were part of that community.”
Zeldes said that by reviewing the newspapers’ stances on the issue, it gives us a clue to the political and cultural mood of the time.
“It indicates,” she said, “that some segments of society in the late 1960s were ready to lessen social and cultural marriage restrictions, but that other groups in the United States were still undecided.”
News as a Cultural Mirror: Historically Black Newspapers Reflecting Public Views of Loving v. Virginia (1967) (DOI: 10.1111/josi.12144)
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday December 29 2015, @11:05PM
We had one interracial couple in our town. I recall that almost no one wanted anything to do with them. White people looked at them weird, blacks looked at them weird, Slovaks thought they were weird. Oddly, it seemed that the Italian community were a little more accepting of them. (And, I specified those four communities, because they were separate and distinct at that point in time.)
A little later, when interracial couples started to become more common, my stepdad often commented, "If you see a black boy with a white girl, you know one thing about that black boy. He keeps bad company." As I aged, that little homily seemed to be pretty accurate. Years later, the accuracy started fading. It's not entirely false yet, but it's less true than it was 40 years ago. Still - how many people REALLY want to associate with Kim Kardashian? Lots of people want to be associated with the Kardashian's money, but would you REALLY want HER?
I had a little girl in my classes, Wanda, who was (well, probably still is) black. I was always fascinated by her - quiet, dignified, smart, easy to talk to, and she had gorgeous sparkling green eyes. I remember her and her best freind sticking up for little kids when the big kids would pick on them. But, we sure as hell couldn't be friends, because EVERYONE would have thought we were weird. I've wondered a few times what could have been, if race relations weren't so shitty back then. Or, maybe the question is, what might have happened if I weren't so cowardly.