Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday January 02 2016, @06:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the Sasha-and-Malia-feel-left-out dept.

DJI Innovations, the leading manufacturer of drones, launched a beta version of its new "geofencing" system that should keep its drones from flying into restricted airspace. The new feature is called Geospatial Environment Online (GEO), and it will let users know about areas where drone flight is restricted, either due to regulations or because of safety issues.

GEO will stop DJI drones from taking off in restricted areas like airports, Washington D.C., and temporarily restricted areas such as places near forest fires or big stadium events. Sensitive areas around prisons and power plants will be off limits in the system as well.

DJI owners can temporarily opt out of GEO and unlock some of the flight restrictions, but there's a catch. They must have verified accounts with the company, with a credit card, debit card, or cellphone number on file. Users cannot turn off all the flight restrictions though; places like Washington D.C. will remain completely off limits.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Gravis on Saturday January 02 2016, @07:15PM

    by Gravis (4596) on Saturday January 02 2016, @07:15PM (#283761)

    this is just a list for idiots who buy premade quads. this isn't really about security, just idiots.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday January 02 2016, @07:53PM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday January 02 2016, @07:53PM (#283779) Journal

    Almost everybody owning a drone buys pre-made quads. The number of people ACTUALLY building their own could all sleep comfortably in your local Motel 6, regardless of what Make Magazine says. And even those are buying their guidance systems commercially.

    The problem here is that this will be hacked in three minutes, and the method published on the web. Its not a real solution.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 3, Touché) by wonkey_monkey on Saturday January 02 2016, @10:07PM

      by wonkey_monkey (279) on Saturday January 02 2016, @10:07PM (#283829) Homepage

      could all sleep comfortably in your local Motel 6

      Pfft. Like anyone could sleep comfortably at a Motel 6.

      (I have no idea what a Motel 6 is like)

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk
    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Saturday January 02 2016, @11:12PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday January 02 2016, @11:12PM (#283845)

      Those three guys making all the variants of open pilot software have been really productive, then.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 03 2016, @04:46AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 03 2016, @04:46AM (#283959)

      It's not that hard. There are plenty of people building uavs from flight boards. Many, many kits with everything you need but a transmitter.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by xpda on Saturday January 02 2016, @08:49PM

    by xpda (5991) on Saturday January 02 2016, @08:49PM (#283795) Homepage

    This isn't really about security, just theater.
    (In most cases, manufactured quads are now cheaper and as capable as the homebuilt, self-programmed variety. They've made a lot of progress lately.)

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday January 02 2016, @10:51PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Saturday January 02 2016, @10:51PM (#283840)
    You say that as if idiots with drones haven't already been a big problem.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Sunday January 03 2016, @01:52AM

    by deimtee (3272) on Sunday January 03 2016, @01:52AM (#283896) Journal

    Yes, but it is useful for those idiots to help keep them out of trouble and stop bothering people.
    Many people don't want to fly where they are not allowed, they just want to have some fun with a toy. Having the drone say "I won't fly here, we are too close to the airport/stadium/white house" keeps them from being arrested, beaten up and shot, and saves the state an expensive court case. If the idiot disables the software then that provides clear intent to break the rules and removes the "I didn't know" defence.

    The best effect would be to increase aircraft safety. (I don't want any jet I am on sucking one into the engine).

    The only effect on security would be to reduce the incidence of false alarms. (which is probably useful).

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.