Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday January 05 2016, @12:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the emoji-are-the-modern-world's-hieroglyphics dept.

Unicode version 9.0 is scheduled for release in June 2016. The final repertoire is not yet fixed, but currently 7,227 characters are scheduled for addition to Unicode 9.0, which will bring the total number of graphic and format characters in the Unicode Standard to 127,899 characters (in case you are concerned that Unicode is running out of space, that still leaves room for another 846,566 characters to be encoded). In summary, Unicode 9.0 will include 9 new blocks (named ranges of characters) and cover 4 new scripts (Osage, Bhaiksuki, Marchen and Tangut), making a total of 268 blocks and 133 scripts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday January 05 2016, @04:13PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday January 05 2016, @04:13PM (#285186) Homepage Journal

    One doesn't currently unless one has uber edity powers and then only in the stories. Easy enough to add to comments though as it's just a db setting. May add <strike> tag (or whatever the html5 proper way to do it is) support this next update.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Tuesday January 05 2016, @06:25PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Tuesday January 05 2016, @06:25PM (#285242) Journal

    HTML5 removed the <strike> element in favor of the otherwise synonymous <s> element [mozilla.org], an element whose phrasing contents "represent things that are no longer relevant or no longer accurate". Contrast with the <del> and <ins> elements, which are intended for documents that include inline diffs.

    Until Rehash on SoylentNews is configured to allow the <s> element, you can add ^W times the number of words to delete after the text: "I know why legislators let this piece of dung law through: brib^W campaign contr^W^W contributions to the super PACs supporting them."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:55PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:55PM (#285392)

      Yeah, the ^W (or ^H) thing was mildly amusing 20 years ago.

      Not so much today.

      Pretty lame, actually.

    • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:18AM

      by darkfeline (1030) on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:18AM (#285406) Homepage

      Semantically, it seems like most usages of strikethrough in posts would use the tag and not the tag.

      For example, "Praise be to Big Brother^H^H^HGoogle".

      Here, "Big Brother" isn't "no longer relevant", but rather text deleted in the course of censorship^H^H^Hediting. So fits semantically.

      Since SoylentNews doesn't allow editing posts, shouldn't ever be needed; if it's no longer accurate at the time of writing the post, don't include it at all.

      --
      Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
  • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Tuesday January 05 2016, @06:27PM

    by RamiK (1813) on Tuesday January 05 2016, @06:27PM (#285244)
    I see <s> but not <strike> in the html5.1 October 2015 draft: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/single-page.html .
    <s> is described as "Inaccurate text".

    There's also <del> and <ins> (still tagged "non-normative") which would actually be more appropriate for all the <del>stupid jokes</del><ins>whimsical usages</ins> I had in mind... but I'm not sure it's worth it.
    --
    compiling...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @08:48PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @08:48PM (#285312)

      What are you talking about? The <del> and <ins> elements are standard. The only thing non-normative is the sections are the descriptions about their behavior in lists and across paragraphs.

      • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Wednesday January 06 2016, @04:04AM

        by RamiK (1813) on Wednesday January 06 2016, @04:04AM (#285488)
        Look under 4.7.4. It seems the implied paragraph boundaries aren't fully agreed on in some cases that don't necessarily concern tables and lists. I think the issue is merging and cutting paragraphs. In those instances, you'd want to <del> foo.</p><p>Bar...</del> but with the current rules you won't be able to.

        Well, I haven't really looked too hard at it so you might be right... But that's what I'm getting from it at a moment's glance.
        --
        compiling...
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @09:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @09:00PM (#285321)

    Speaking of the posting form, why are the descriptions for the posting modes so weird?

    Plain Old Text: not plain old text, actually allows HTML tags
    HTML formatted: POT but without preserving line endings
    Extrans: What you'd expect Plain Old Text to be
    Code: Extrans but wrapped in a <tt>

    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:51AM

      by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:51AM (#285432) Homepage Journal

      I have no idea. They were that weird when we got them. At this point I think it would confuse more people than it would make happy to rework them into something that made sense.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:16AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:16AM (#285438)

        Maybe an idea for the world-famous Soylent Poll Booth® [soylentnews.org]?